132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10206011)
1. Prognostic assessment of the Durie and Salmon staging system in patients with multiple myeloma.
Spasov E; Goranova V
Folia Med (Plovdiv); 1998; 40(3B Suppl 3):121-3. PubMed ID: 10206011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Prognostic value of the new international staging system in multiple myeloma. Comparison with Durie-Salmon staging system].
Conté L G; Figueroa M G; Lois V V; Cabrera C ME; León R A; García L H; Rojas R H
Rev Med Chil; 2008 Jan; 136(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 18483648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnetic resonance imaging as a supplement for the clinical staging system of Durie and Salmon?
Baur A; Stäbler A; Nagel D; Lamerz R; Bartl R; Hiller E; Wendtner C; Bachner F; Reiser M
Cancer; 2002 Sep; 95(6):1334-45. PubMed ID: 12216103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical staging in multiple myeloma.
Woodruff RK; Wadsworth J; Malpas JS; Tobias JS
Br J Haematol; 1979 Jun; 42(2):199-205. PubMed ID: 465365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Role of
Deng S; Zhang B; Zhou Y; Xu X; Li J; Sang S; Zhang W
Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2018; 2018():4198673. PubMed ID: 30154686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Long-term survival and prognostic factors in stage II-III multiple myeloma treated with conventional chemotherapy].
Pertuiset E; Chevret S; Lioté F; Delauche MC; Bardin T; Dryll A; Kuntz D
Ann Med Interne (Paris); 1992; 143(8):519-24. PubMed ID: 1303595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of criteria in staging in multiple myeloma.
Pennec Y; Mottier D; Youinou P; Asselain B; Miossec P; Le Goff P; Le Prise PY; Le Menn G
Haematologia (Budap); 1982; 15(2):221-6. PubMed ID: 7160667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Prognostic analysis and assessment on the clinical staging systems of multiple myeloma--a report of 206 cases].
Tao ZF; Fu WJ; Chen YB; Yuan ZG; Wang DX; Hou J
Ai Zheng; 2006 Apr; 25(4):461-4. PubMed ID: 16613681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Clinical features and survival of Chilean patients with multiple myeloma].
Conté L G; Figueroa M G; Lois V V; Cabrera C ME; León R A; García L H; Rojas R H
Rev Med Chil; 2007 Sep; 135(9):1111-7. PubMed ID: 18064364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improvement of Durie & Salmon staging for multiple myeloma by adding platelet count as a stratifying variable: a multivariate regression analysis of 163 untreated patients.
Cavo M; Galieni P; Grimaldi M; Zuffa E; Bonelli MA; Gobbi M; Tura S
Eur J Haematol Suppl; 1989; 51():99-104. PubMed ID: 2697598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Analysis of the international staging system of multiple myeloma and its comparison with the DS and IFM staging system in 122 Chinese patients].
Deng SH; Xu Y; Mai YJ; Wang YF; Zhao YZ; Zou DH; Qiu LG
Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Apr; 29(4):217-21. PubMed ID: 18843972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. International staging system for multiple myeloma.
Greipp PR; San Miguel J; Durie BG; Crowley JJ; Barlogie B; Bladé J; Boccadoro M; Child JA; Avet-Loiseau H; Kyle RA; Lahuerta JJ; Ludwig H; Morgan G; Powles R; Shimizu K; Shustik C; Sonneveld P; Tosi P; Turesson I; Westin J
J Clin Oncol; 2005 May; 23(15):3412-20. PubMed ID: 15809451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is the International Staging System superior to the Durie-Salmon staging system? A comparison in multiple myeloma patients undergoing autologous transplant.
Hari PN; Zhang MJ; Roy V; Pérez WS; Bashey A; To LB; Elfenbein G; Freytes CO; Gale RP; Gibson J; Kyle RA; Lazarus HM; McCarthy PL; Milone GA; Pavlovsky S; Reece DE; Schiller G; Vela-Ojeda J; Weisdorf D; Vesole D
Leukemia; 2009 Aug; 23(8):1528-34. PubMed ID: 19322205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Staging systems for multiple myeloma: a comparison.
Gassmann W; Pralle H; Haferlach T; Pandurevic S; Graubner M; Schmitz N; Löffler H
Br J Haematol; 1985 Apr; 59(4):703-11. PubMed ID: 3986136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A new staging system for multiple myeloma patients based on the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) experience.
Jacobson JL; Hussein MA; Barlogie B; Durie BG; Crowley JJ;
Br J Haematol; 2003 Aug; 122(3):441-50. PubMed ID: 12877671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic factors and staging systems of multiple myeloma:
Tao ZF; Fu WJ; Yuan ZG; Wang DX; Chen YB; Hou J
Chin Med J (Engl); 2007 Oct; 120(19):1655-8. PubMed ID: 17935664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Critical study of staging in multiple myeloma.
Pennec Y; Mottier D; Youinou P; Asselain B; Chavance M; Le Goff P; Le Prise PY; Miossec P; Le Menn G
Scand J Haematol; 1983 Feb; 30(2):183-90. PubMed ID: 6860419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Staging and survival in multiple myeloma.
Wahlin A
Scand J Haematol; 1984 Jul; 33(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 6463584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Screening of prognostic factors and comparing of staging systems of multiple myeloma].
Li J; Wu XB; Zhou Y; Wang X; Chen JX
Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Aug; 20(4):926-9. PubMed ID: 22931656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical staging and therapeutic results in multiple myeloma.
Santoro A; Schieppati G; Franchi F; Valagussa P; Monfardini S
Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol; 1983 Oct; 19(10):1353-9. PubMed ID: 6685627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
