These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10207199)
1. Detection of early interproximal caries in vitro using laser fluorescence, dye-enhanced laser fluorescence and direct visual examination. Eggertsson H; Analoui M; van der Veen M; González-Cabezas C; Eckert G; Stookey G Caries Res; 1999; 33(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 10207199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An in vitro comparison between laser fluorescence and visual examination for detection of demineralization in occlusal pits and fissures. Ferreira Zandoná AG; Analoui M; Beiswanger BB; Isaacs RL; Kafrawy AH; Eckert GJ; Stookey GK Caries Res; 1998; 32(3):210-8. PubMed ID: 9577987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A clinical study of a laser fluorescence device for the detection of approximal caries in primary molars. Chen J; Qin M; Ma W; Ge L Int J Paediatr Dent; 2012 Mar; 22(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 21951216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection of approximal caries with a new laser fluorescence device. Lussi A; Hack A; Hug I; Heckenberger H; Megert B; Stich H Caries Res; 2006; 40(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 16508265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relative ability of laser fluorescence techniques to quantitate early mineral loss in vitro. Ando M; Hall AF; Eckert GJ; Schemehorn BR; Analoui M; Stookey GK Caries Res; 1997; 31(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 9118184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An in vitro comparison of detection methods for approximal carious lesions in primary molars. Chawla N; Messer LB; Adams GG; Manton DJ Caries Res; 2012; 46(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 22508449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validity and reliability of laser-induced fluorescence measurements on carious root surfaces in vitro. Karlsson L; Johansson E; Tranaeus S Caries Res; 2009; 43(5):397-404. PubMed ID: 19776571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical effectiveness of laser fluorescence, visual inspection and radiography in the detection of occlusal caries. Angnes V; Angnes G; Batisttella M; Grande RH; Loguercio AD; Reis A Caries Res; 2005; 39(6):490-5. PubMed ID: 16251794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical performance of a diode laser fluorescence device for the detection of occlusal caries in primary teeth. Kavvadia K; Lagouvardos P Int J Paediatr Dent; 2008 May; 18(3):197-204. PubMed ID: 18384348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro ability of a laser fluorescence device in quantifying approximal caries lesions in primary molars. Celiberti P; Leamari VM; Imparato JC; Braga MM; Mendes FM J Dent; 2010 Aug; 38(8):666-70. PubMed ID: 20470856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance of fluorescence methods, radiographic examination and ICDAS II on occlusal surfaces in vitro. Rodrigues JA; Hug I; Diniz MB; Lussi A Caries Res; 2008; 42(4):297-304. PubMed ID: 18663299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of placing a clear sealant on the validity and reproducibility of occlusal caries detection by a laser fluorescence device: an in vitro study. Deery C; Iloya J; Nugent ZJ; Srinivasan V Caries Res; 2006; 40(3):186-93. PubMed ID: 16707865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pen-type laser fluorescence device versus bitewing radiographs for caries detection on approximal surfaces. Bizhang M; Wollenweber N; Singh-Hüsgen P; Danesh G; Zimmer S Head Face Med; 2016 Nov; 12(1):30. PubMed ID: 27809872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Visual-tactile examination compared with conventional radiography, digital radiography, and Diagnodent in the diagnosis of occlusal occult caries in extracted premolars. Chong MJ; Seow WK; Purdie DM; Cheng E; Wan V Pediatr Dent; 2003; 25(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 13678099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The in vitro performance of laser fluorescence and caries-detector dye for detecting residual carious dentin during tooth preparation. Yazici AR; Baseren M; Gokalp S Quintessence Int; 2005 Jun; 36(6):417-22. PubMed ID: 15954247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of visual inspection, radiographic examination, laser fluorescence and their combinations on treatment decisions for occlusal surfaces. Valera FB; Pessan JP; Valera RC; Mondelli J; Percinoto C Am J Dent; 2008 Feb; 21(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 18435372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnosis of approximal caries: bite-wing radiology versus the Ultrasound Caries Detector. An in vitro study. Matalon S; Feuerstein O; Kaffe I Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 May; 95(5):626-31. PubMed ID: 12738956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance of DIAGNOdent for detection and quantification of smooth-surface caries in primary teeth. Mendes FM; Siqueira WL; Mazzitelli JF; Pinheiro SL; Bengtson AL J Dent; 2005 Jan; 33(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 15652172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]