183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10207413)
1. Mammography in the 1990s: the United States and Canada.
Suleiman OH; Spelic DC; McCrohan JL; Symonds GR; Houn F
Radiology; 1999 Feb; 210(2):345-51. PubMed ID: 10207413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. National survey of mammographic facilities in 1985, 1988, and 1992.
Conway BJ; Suleiman OH; Rueter FG; Antonsen RG; Slayton RJ
Radiology; 1994 May; 191(2):323-30. PubMed ID: 8153301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Has the mammography quality standards act affected the mammography quality in North Carolina?
Pisano ED; Schell M; Rollins J; Burns CB; Hall B; Lin Y; Braeuning MP; Burke E; Holliday J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Apr; 174(4):1089-91. PubMed ID: 10749257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Legislative and regulatory mandates for mammography quality assurance.
Fintor L; Alciati MH; Fischer R
J Public Health Policy; 1995; 16(1):81-107. PubMed ID: 7738160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MQSA (Mammography Quality Standards Act) update--focusing on quality assurance.
Butler PF
Radiol Manage; 1998; 20(4):40-50. PubMed ID: 10181471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nationwide Evaluation of X-ray Trends survey of abdomen and lumbosacral spine radiography.
Spelic DC; Kaczmarek RV; Suleiman OH
Radiology; 2004 Jul; 232(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 15220497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Approval of an alternative requirement of the Mammography Quality Standards Act; availability--FDA. Notice.
Fed Regist; 1998 Nov; 63(216 Pt 1):60352. PubMed ID: 10187394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The negative impact of MQSA (Mammography Quality Standards Act) on rural mammography programs.
Inman M
Radiol Manage; 1998; 20(4):31-9. PubMed ID: 10181470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MQSA update.
Odle TG
Radiol Technol; 2003; 74(3):202-20; quiz 221-4, 227. PubMed ID: 12584968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Factors affecting increasing radiation dose for mammography in North Carolina from 1997 through 2001: an analysis of Food and Drug Administration annual surveys.
Pisano ED; Chiu YF; Ni L; Li Y; Britt GG; Johnson RE; Burns B; Cole E; Kuzmiak C; Koomen M; Pavic D
Acad Radiol; 2004 May; 11(5):536-43. PubMed ID: 15147618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of the Mammography Quality Standards Act on the availability of mammography facilities.
Fischer R; Houn F; Van De Griek A; Tucker SA; Meyers D; Murphy M; Unis G
Prev Med; 1998; 27(5 Pt 1):697-701. PubMed ID: 9808801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of equipment performance, patient dose, imaging quality, and diagnostic coincidence in five Mexico City mammography services.
Brandan ME; Ruiz-Trejo C; Verdejo-Silva M; Guevara M; Lozano-Zalce H; Madero-Preciado L; Martín J; Noel-Etienne LM; Ramírez-Arias JL; Soto J; Villaseñor Y
Arch Med Res; 2004; 35(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 15036796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors affecting decreasing radiation dose for mammography in North Carolina after 2002: an analysis of Food and Drug Administration annual surveys.
Kuzmiak CM; Pisano ED; Chung Y; Britt GG; Burns B; Cole E
Acad Radiol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):685-91. PubMed ID: 17502258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Medical devices; Mammography Quality Standards Act of 1992; inspection fees--FDA. Notice.
Fed Regist; 1998 Jan; 63(9):2245-8. PubMed ID: 10177337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors affecting film-screen mammographic image quality.
Mathis JH
J Clin Eng; 1995; 20(5):376-87. PubMed ID: 10152444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. United States radiological health activities: inspection results of mammography facilities.
Spelic D; Kaczmarek R; Hilohi M; Belella S
Biomed Imaging Interv J; 2007 Apr; 3(2):e35. PubMed ID: 21614276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality mammography standards--FDA. Proposed rule.
Fed Regist; 1998 Nov; 63(214):59750-1. PubMed ID: 10187387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mammography in the eighties.
Conway BJ; McCrohan JL; Rueter FG; Suleiman OH
Radiology; 1990 Nov; 177(2):335-9. PubMed ID: 2217765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MQSA helps eliminate inferior mammography.
Wagner SK
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1997 Nov; 19(11):129-32, 136. PubMed ID: 10176114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Global quality control perspective for the physical and technical aspects of screen-film mammography--image quality and radiation dose.
Ng KH; Jamal N; DeWerd L
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 16709704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
