158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10207459)
1. Extrahepatic abdominal imaging in patients with malignancy: comparison of MR imaging and helical CT, with subsequent surgical correlation.
Low RN; Semelka RC; Worawattanakul S; Alzate GD; Sigeti JS
Radiology; 1999 Mar; 210(3):625-32. PubMed ID: 10207459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Extrahepatic abdominal imaging in patients with malignancy: comparison of MR imaging and helical CT in 164 patients.
Low RN; Semelka RC; Worawattanakul S; Alzate GD
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2000 Aug; 12(2):269-77. PubMed ID: 10931590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ovarian cancer: staging with CT and MR imaging.
Forstner R; Hricak H; Occhipinti KA; Powell CB; Frankel SD; Stern JL
Radiology; 1995 Dec; 197(3):619-26. PubMed ID: 7480729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Peritoneal tumor: MR imaging with dilute oral barium and intravenous gadolinium-containing contrast agents compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT.
Low RN; Barone RM; Lacey C; Sigeti JS; Alzate GD; Sebrechts CP
Radiology; 1997 Aug; 204(2):513-20. PubMed ID: 9240546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ovarian cancer: comparison of findings with perfluorocarbon-enhanced MR imaging, In-111-CYT-103 immunoscintigraphy, and CT.
Low RN; Carter WD; Saleh F; Sigeti JS
Radiology; 1995 May; 195(2):391-400. PubMed ID: 7724757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Crohn's disease evaluation: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR imaging and single-phase helical CT scanning.
Low RN; Francis IR; Politoske D; Bennett M
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2000 Feb; 11(2):127-35. PubMed ID: 10713944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MR imaging of peritoneal disease: comparison of contrast-enhanced fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled and spin-echo imaging.
Low RN; Sigeti JS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1131-40. PubMed ID: 7976889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and dual-phase helical CT in the preoperative assessment of suspected pancreatic cancer: a comparative study with receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Sheridan MB; Ward J; Guthrie JA; Spencer JA; Craven CM; Wilson D; Guillou PJ; Robinson PJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Sep; 173(3):583-90. PubMed ID: 10470884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MR imaging of the gastrointestinal tract with i.v., gadolinium and diluted barium oral contrast media compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT.
Low RN; Francis IR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):1051-9. PubMed ID: 9308464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of occult primary tumors in patients with cervical metastases of unknown primary tumors: comparison of (18)F FDG PET/CT with contrast-enhanced CT or CT/MR imaging-prospective study.
Lee JR; Kim JS; Roh JL; Lee JH; Baek JH; Cho KJ; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
Radiology; 2015 Mar; 274(3):764-71. PubMed ID: 25405771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Primary ovarian cancer: prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced CT and pre-and postcontrast, fat-suppressed MR imaging, with histologic correlation.
Semelka RC; Lawrence PH; Shoenut JP; Heywood M; Kroeker MA; Lotocki R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1993; 3(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 8428108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy and safety of MR imaging with liver-specific contrast agent: U.S. multicenter phase III study.
Bluemke DA; Sahani D; Amendola M; Balzer T; Breuer J; Brown JJ; Casalino DD; Davis PL; Francis IR; Krinsky G; Lee FT; Lu D; Paulson EK; Schwartz LH; Siegelman ES; Small WC; Weber TM; Welber A; Shamsi K
Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):89-98. PubMed ID: 16126918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging versus four-phase multi-detector row computed tomography in assessing tumor regression after radiofrequency ablation in subjects with hepatocellular carcinomas.
Yoon JH; Lee EJ; Cha SS; Han SS; Choi SJ; Juhn JR; Kim MH; Lee YJ; Park SJ
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2010 Mar; 21(3):348-56. PubMed ID: 20116285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CT and MR imaging of abdominal liposarcoma.
Kim T; Murakami T; Oi H; Tsuda K; Matsushita M; Tomoda K; Fukuda H; Nakamura H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Apr; 166(4):829-33. PubMed ID: 8610559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Local extension of pancreatic carcinoma: assessment with thin-section helical CT versus with breath-hold fast MR imaging--ROC analysis.
Nishiharu T; Yamashita Y; Abe Y; Mitsuzaki K; Tsuchigame T; Nakayama Y; Takahashi M
Radiology; 1999 Aug; 212(2):445-52. PubMed ID: 10429702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bladder tumor staging: comparison of contrast-enhanced CT, T1- and T2-weighted MR imaging, dynamic gadolinium-enhanced imaging, and late gadolinium-enhanced imaging.
Kim B; Semelka RC; Ascher SM; Chalpin DB; Carroll PR; Hricak H
Radiology; 1994 Oct; 193(1):239-45. PubMed ID: 8090898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction: efficacy of fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging vs spin-echo MR imaging, CT, and cholangiography.
Low RN; Sigeti JS; Francis IR; Weinman D; Bower B; Shimakawa A; Foo TK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb; 162(2):315-23. PubMed ID: 8310918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Liver and abdominal screening in patients with cancer: CT versus MR imaging.
Chezmar JL; Rumancik WM; Megibow AJ; Hulnick DH; Nelson RC; Bernardino ME
Radiology; 1988 Jul; 168(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 3380982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective evaluation of contrast-enhanced MRI in the depiction of peritoneal spread in primary or recurrent ovarian cancer.
Ricke J; Sehouli J; Hach C; Hänninen EL; Lichtenegger W; Felix R
Eur Radiol; 2003 May; 13(5):943-9. PubMed ID: 12695813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Imaging bowel obstruction: a comparison between fast magnetic resonance imaging and helical computed tomography.
Beall DP; Fortman BJ; Lawler BC; Regan F
Clin Radiol; 2002 Aug; 57(8):719-24. PubMed ID: 12169282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
