147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10207481)
1. Uveal melanoma: correlation of histopathologic and radiologic findings by using thin-section MR imaging with a surface coil.
Lemke AJ; Hosten N; Bornfeld N; Bechrakis NE; Schüler A; Richter M; Stroszczynski C; Felix R
Radiology; 1999 Mar; 210(3):775-83. PubMed ID: 10207481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Malignant uveal melanoma and simulating lesions: MR imaging evaluation.
Mafee MF; Peyman GA; Grisolano JE; Fletcher ME; Spigos DG; Wehrli FW; Rasouli F; Capek V
Radiology; 1986 Sep; 160(3):773-80. PubMed ID: 3737917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intracranial metastatic melanoma: correlation between MR imaging characteristics and melanin content.
Isiklar I; Leeds NE; Fuller GN; Kumar AJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1503-12. PubMed ID: 7484597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Appearance of choroidal melanoma on high resolution MRI using 1.5T with a dedicated surface coil in 200 consecutive patients].
Lemke AJ; Hosten N; Bornfeld N; Bechrakis NE; Frenzel D; Richter M; Felix R
Rofo; 1998 Nov; 169(5):471-8. PubMed ID: 9849595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Malignant melanoma of the sinonasal cavity: explanation of magnetic resonance signal intensities with histopathologic characteristics.
Kim SS; Han MH; Kim JE; Lee CH; Chung HW; Lee JS; Chang KH
Am J Otolaryngol; 2000; 21(6):366-78. PubMed ID: 11115521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Uveal melanoma: evaluation of extrascleral extension using thin-section MR of the eye with surface coils.
Tartaglione T; Pagliara MM; Sciandra M; Caputo CG; Calandrelli R; Fabrizi G; Gaudino S; Blasi MA; Colosimo C
Radiol Med; 2014 Oct; 119(10):775-83. PubMed ID: 24469990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of magnetic field strength and receiver coil in ocular MRI: a phantom and patient study.
Erb-Eigner K; Warmuth C; Taupitz M; Willerding G; Bertelmann E; Asbach P
Rofo; 2013 Sep; 185(9):830-7. PubMed ID: 23888471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intraocular metastases: differential diagnosis from uveal melanomas with high-resolution MRI using a surface coil.
Lemke AJ; Hosten N; Wiegel T; Prinz RD; Richter M; Bechrakis NE; Foerster PI; Felix R
Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(12):2593-601. PubMed ID: 11734965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rectal carcinoma: high-spatial-resolution MR imaging and T2 quantification in rectal cancer specimens.
Stollfuss JC; Becker K; Sendler A; Seidl S; Settles M; Auer F; Beer A; Rummeny EJ; Woertler K
Radiology; 2006 Oct; 241(1):132-41. PubMed ID: 16928975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intraocular tumors: evaluation with MR imaging.
Peyster RG; Augsburger JJ; Shields JA; Hershey BL; Eagle R; Haskin ME
Radiology; 1988 Sep; 168(3):773-9. PubMed ID: 3406407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of malignant melanoma of the choroid and ciliary body].
Bossard D; Grange JD; Froment JC; Gerard JP; Lyonnet D
Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr; 1990; 90(8-9):865-7. PubMed ID: 2257671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast lesions: evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging and with T2*-weighted first-pass perfusion MR imaging.
Kvistad KA; Rydland J; Vainio J; Smethurst HB; Lundgren S; Fjøsne HE; Haraldseth O
Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):545-53. PubMed ID: 10924584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relationship between contrast enhancement on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MR sequences and signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images: visual evaluation of brain tumors.
Kubota T; Yamada K; Kizu O; Hirota T; Ito H; Ishihara K; Nishimura T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Jun; 21(6):694-700. PubMed ID: 15906343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rectal carcinoma: double-contrast MR imaging for preoperative staging.
Wallengren NO; Holtås S; Andrén-Sandberg A; Jonsson E; Kristoffersson DT; McGill S
Radiology; 2000 Apr; 215(1):108-14. PubMed ID: 10751475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Uveal melanoma: detection of extraocular growth with MR imaging and US.
Hosten N; Bornfeld N; Wassmuth R; Lemke AJ; Sander B; Bechrakis NE; Felix R
Radiology; 1997 Jan; 202(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 8988193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reducing metallic artifacts in postoperative spinal imaging: usefulness of IDEAL contrast-enhanced T1- and T2-weighted MR imaging--phantom and clinical studies.
Cha JG; Jin W; Lee MH; Kim DH; Park JS; Shin WH; Yi BH
Radiology; 2011 Jun; 259(3):885-93. PubMed ID: 21386053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Choroidal hemangioma: MR findings and differentiation from uveal melanoma.
Stroszczynski C; Hosten N; Bornfeld N; Wiegel T; Schueler A; Foerster P; Lemke AJ; Hoffmann KT; Felix R
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1998 Sep; 19(8):1441-7. PubMed ID: 9763374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: MR findings and value of T1-versus T2-weighted fast spin-echo images.
Yasumoto M; Shibuya H; Takeda M; Korenaga T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Apr; 164(4):981-7. PubMed ID: 7726062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MR imaging of peritoneal disease: comparison of contrast-enhanced fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled and spin-echo imaging.
Low RN; Sigeti JS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1131-40. PubMed ID: 7976889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Renal masses: quantitative analysis of enhancement with signal intensity measurements versus qualitative analysis of enhancement with image subtraction for diagnosing malignancy at MR imaging.
Hecht EM; Israel GM; Krinsky GA; Hahn WY; Kim DC; Belitskaya-Levy I; Lee VS
Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):373-8. PubMed ID: 15215544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
