These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10207655)

  • 1. Automatic karyotyping of metaphase cells with overlapping chromosomes.
    Popescu M; Gader P; Keller J; Klein C; Stanley J; Caldwell C
    Comput Biol Med; 1999 Jan; 29(1):61-82. PubMed ID: 10207655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. MetaSel: a metaphase selection tool using a Gaussian-based classification technique.
    Uttamatanin R; Yuvapoositanon P; Intarapanich A; Kaewkamnerd S; Phuksaritanon R; Assawamakin A; Tongsima S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013; 14 Suppl 16(Suppl 16):S13. PubMed ID: 24564477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A novel approach for efficient extrication of overlapping chromosomes in automated karyotyping.
    Munot MV; Mukherjee J; Joshi M
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2013 Dec; 51(12):1325-38. PubMed ID: 23959611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Classifier of domestic pig (Sus scrofa domesticus) automatic chromosome identification].
    Stefanova VN; Zenina MN
    Tsitologiia; 2014; 56(10):779-84. PubMed ID: 25711088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A review of metaphase chromosome image selection techniques for automatic karyotype generation.
    Arora T; Dhir R
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2016 Aug; 54(8):1147-57. PubMed ID: 26676686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Athena semi-automated karyotyping system.
    van Vliet LJ; Young IT; Mayall BH
    Cytometry; 1990; 11(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 2307062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Centromere attribute integration based chromosome polarity assignment.
    Stanley RJ; Keller J; Caldwell CW; Gader P
    Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp; 1996; ():284-8. PubMed ID: 8947673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Homologue matching using the Choquet integral.
    Stanley RJ; Keller J; Gader P; Caldwell CW
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1997; 34():315-20. PubMed ID: 9603059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automatic karyotype analysis.
    Graham J; Piper J
    Methods Mol Biol; 1994; 29():141-85. PubMed ID: 8032408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Algorithms for modeling structural changes in human chromosomes.
    Yang X; Wu W; Tseng CC
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 May; 110(2):171-82. PubMed ID: 23148917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A rule-based computer scheme for centromere identification and polarity assignment of metaphase chromosomes.
    Wang X; Zheng B; Li S; Mulvihill JJ; Liu H
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Jan; 89(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 18082909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Enhanced Rotated Mask R-CNN for Chromosome Segmentation.
    Wang P; Hu W; Zhang J; Wen Y; Xu C; Qian D
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2021 Nov; 2021():2769-2772. PubMed ID: 34891823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of image manipulation on automated karyotyping.
    Stanley RJ; Caldwell CW; Keller J; Gader P
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1997; 33():305-10. PubMed ID: 9731376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. KaryoXpert: An accurate chromosome segmentation and classification framework for karyotyping analysis without training with manually labeled metaphase-image mask annotations.
    Chen S; Zhang K; Hu J; Li N; Xu A; Li H; Zhou J; Huang C; Yu Y; Gao X
    Comput Biol Med; 2024 Jul; 177():108601. PubMed ID: 38776728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Data-driven homologue matching for chromosome identification.
    Stanley RJ; Keller JM; Gader P; Caldwell CW
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1998 Jun; 17(3):451-62. PubMed ID: 9735908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automated classification of metaphase chromosomes: optimization of an adaptive computerized scheme.
    Wang X; Zheng B; Li S; Mulvihill JJ; Wood MC; Liu H
    J Biomed Inform; 2009 Feb; 42(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 18585097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experience with the Athena semi-automated karyotyping system.
    Mayall BH; Tucker JD; Christensen ML; van Vliet LJ; Young IT
    Cytometry; 1990; 11(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 2307063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automated chromosome classification limitations due to image processing.
    Stanley R; Keller J; Gader P; Caldwell CW
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1995; 31():183-8. PubMed ID: 7654959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Chromosome analysis by image processing in a computerized environment. Clinical applications.
    Malet P; Benkhalifa M; Perissel B; Geneix A; Le Corvaisier B
    J Radiat Res; 1992 Mar; 33 Suppl():171-88. PubMed ID: 1507168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automatic classification of chromosomes as part of a routine system for clinical analysis.
    Lundsteen C; Gerdes T; Maahr J
    Cytometry; 1986 Jan; 7(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 3948602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.