164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10208502)
1. Classification criteria for skin-sensitizing chemicals: a commentary.
Basketter DA; Flyvholm MA; Menné T
Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Apr; 40(4):175-82. PubMed ID: 10208502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Regulatory classification of substances oxidized to skin sensitizers on exposure to air.
Karlberg AT; Basketter D; Goossens A; Lepoittevin JP
Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Apr; 40(4):183-8. PubMed ID: 10208503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the skin sensitizing potency of chemicals by using the existing methods and considerations of relevance for elicitation.
Basketter DA; Andersen KE; Liden C; Van Loveren H; Boman A; Kimber I; Alanko K; Berggren E
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Jan; 52(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 15701129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identification and classification of skin sensitizers: identifying false positives and false negatives.
Basketter DA; McFadden J; Evans P; Andersen KE; Jowsey I
Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Nov; 55(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 17026691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Skin sensitization testing in potency and risk assessment.
Kimber I; Basketter DA; Berthold K; Butler M; Garrigue JL; Lea L; Newsome C; Roggeband R; Steiling W; Stropp G; Waterman S; Wiemann C
Toxicol Sci; 2001 Feb; 59(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 11158712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Designation of substances as skin sensitizing chemicals: a commentary.
Kimber I; Dearman RJ; Gerberick GF; Roggeband R; Basketter DA
Hum Exp Toxicol; 2003 Aug; 22(8):439-43. PubMed ID: 12948084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors affecting thresholds in allergic contact dermatitis: safety and regulatory considerations.
Basketter DA; Evans P; Gerberick GF; Kimber IA
Contact Dermatitis; 2002 Jul; 47(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 12225405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of the local lymph node assay for the estimation of relative contact allergenic potency.
Basketter DA; Balikie L; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Ryan CA; Gerberick GF; Harvey P; Evans P; White IR; Rycroft RJ
Contact Dermatitis; 2000 Jun; 42(6):344-8. PubMed ID: 10871098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Proactive surveillance of contact allergies: an important component of the risk management strategy for skin sensitizers.
Jowsey IR
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Jun; 56(6):305-10. PubMed ID: 17577370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative relationship between the local lymph node assay and human skin sensitization assays.
Schneider K; Akkan Z
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2004 Jun; 39(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 15135206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Categorization of chemicals according to their relative human skin sensitizing potency.
Basketter DA; Alépée N; Ashikaga T; Barroso J; Gilmour N; Goebel C; Hibatallah J; Hoffmann S; Kern P; Martinozzi-Teissier S; Maxwell G; Reisinger K; Sakaguchi H; Schepky A; Tailhardat M; Templier M
Dermatitis; 2014; 25(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 24407057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Skin sensitization: strategies for the assessment and management of risk.
Basketter DA
Br J Dermatol; 2008 Aug; 159(2):267-73. PubMed ID: 18503602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Skin sensitization potency of methyl methacrylate in the local lymph node assay: comparisons with guinea-pig data and human experience.
Betts CJ; Dearman RJ; Heylings JR; Kimber I; Basketter DA
Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Sep; 55(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 16918612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Designation of substances as skin sensitizing chemicals: a reply.
Schnuch A; Lessmann H; Becker D; Diepgen TL; Drexler H; Erdmann S; Fartasch M; Greim H; Kricke-Helling P; Merget R; Merk H; Nowak D; Rothe A; Stropp G; Wallenstein G; Uter W
Hum Exp Toxicol; 2005 Mar; 24(3):157-9. PubMed ID: 15901055
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Lymphocyte surface markers and cytokines are suitable for detection and potency assessment of skin-sensitizing chemicals in an in vitro model of allergic contact dermatitis: the LCSA-ly.
Frombach J; Sonnenburg A; Krapohl BD; Zuberbier T; Peiser M; Stahlmann R; Schreiner M
Arch Toxicol; 2018 Apr; 92(4):1495-1505. PubMed ID: 29380012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An interlaboratory evaluation of the Buehler test for the identification and classification of skin sensitizers.
Basketter DA; Gerberick GF
Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Sep; 35(3):146-51. PubMed ID: 8930474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis diagnosed by a systematic stepwise exposure assessment of allergens in the work environment.
Friis UF; Menné T; Flyvholm MA; Bonde JP; Johansen JD
Contact Dermatitis; 2013 Sep; 69(3):153-63. PubMed ID: 23948033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contact allergenic potency: correlation of human and local lymph node assay data.
Gerberick GF; Robinson MK; Ryan CA; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Basketter DA; Wright Z; Marks JG
Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Sep; 12(3):156-61. PubMed ID: 11526521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The local lymph node assay: current position in the regulatory classification of skin sensitizing chemicals.
Basketter DA; Gerberick GF; Kimber I
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2007; 26(4):293-301. PubMed ID: 18058304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The GARD platform for potency assessment of skin sensitizing chemicals.
Zeller KS; Forreryd A; Lindberg T; Gradin R; Chawade A; Lindstedt M
ALTEX; 2017; 34(4):539-559. PubMed ID: 29156079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
