191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10208506)
1. Identification of coumarin as the sensitizer in a patient sensitive to her own perfume but negative to the fragrance mix.
Mutterer V; Giménez Arnau E; Lepoittevin JP; Johansen JD; Frosch PJ; Menné T; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Rastogi SC; White IR
Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Apr; 40(4):196-9. PubMed ID: 10208506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patch testing with a new fragrance mix - reactivity to the individual constituents and chemical detection in relevant cosmetic products.
Frosch PJ; Rastogi SC; Pirker C; Brinkmeier T; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Svedman C; Goossens A; White IR; Uter W; Arnau EG; Lepoittevin JP; Johansen JD; Menne T
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):216-25. PubMed ID: 15859994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Identification of Lilial as a fragrance sensitizer in a perfume by bioassay-guided chemical fractionation and structure-activity relationships.
Arnau EG; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Frosch PJ; Johansen JD; Menné T; Rastogi SC; White IR; Lepoittevin JP
Contact Dermatitis; 2000 Dec; 43(6):351-8. PubMed ID: 11140386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Principles and methodology for identification of fragrance allergens in consumer products.
Gimenez-Arnau A; Gimenez-Arnau E; Serra-Baldrich E; Lepoittevin JP; Camarasa JG
Contact Dermatitis; 2002 Dec; 47(6):345-52. PubMed ID: 12581281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A study of new fragrance mixtures.
Larsen W; Nakayama H; Fischer T; Elsner P; Frosch P; Burrows D; Jordan W; Shaw S; Wilkinson J; Marks J; Sugawara M; Nethercott M; Nethercottdagger J
Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Dec; 9(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9810019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Content and reactivity to product perfumes in fragrance mix positive and negative eczema patients. A study of perfumes used in toiletries and skin-care products.
Johansen JD; Rastogi SC; Andersen KE; Menné T
Contact Dermatitis; 1997 Jun; 36(6):291-6. PubMed ID: 9237007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contact allergy to popular perfumes; assessed by patch test, use test and chemical analysis.
Johansen JD; Rastogi SC; Menné T
Br J Dermatol; 1996 Sep; 135(3):419-22. PubMed ID: 8949436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patch testing with a new fragrance mix detects additional patients sensitive to perfumes and missed by the current fragrance mix.
Frosch PJ; Pirker C; Rastogi SC; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Svedman C; Goossens A; White IR; Uter W; Arnau EG; Lepoittevin JP; Menné T; Johansen JD
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):207-15. PubMed ID: 15859993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Suspected fragrance allergy requires extended patch testing to individual fragrance allergens.
Katsarma G; Gawkrodger DJ
Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Oct; 41(4):193-7. PubMed ID: 10515097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recommendation to include fragrance mix 2 and hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (Lyral) in the European baseline patch test series.
Bruze M; Andersen KE; Goossens A; ;
Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Mar; 58(3):129-33. PubMed ID: 18279149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Myroxylon pereirae resin (balsam of Peru) - A critical review of the literature and assessment of the significance of positive patch test reactions and the usefulness of restrictive diets.
de Groot AC
Contact Dermatitis; 2019 Jun; 80(6):335-353. PubMed ID: 30843216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dermatotoxicologic clinical solutions: clinical management of fragrance mix #1 #2 patients?
Edwards A; Blickenstaff N; Coman G; Maibach H
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2015; 34(2):167-70. PubMed ID: 24964169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Allergic contact dermatitis to fragrance: a review.
Scheinman PL
Am J Contact Dermat; 1996 Jun; 7(2):65-76. PubMed ID: 8796745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Contact allergy for perfume ingredients in cosmetics and toilet articles].
de Groot AC
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1997 Mar; 141(12):571-4. PubMed ID: 9190522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The rôle of coumarin in patch testing.
Kunkeler AC; Weijland JW; Bruynzeel DP
Contact Dermatitis; 1998 Dec; 39(6):327-8. PubMed ID: 9874039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Fragrance contact allergy: a clinical review.
Johansen JD
Am J Clin Dermatol; 2003; 4(11):789-98. PubMed ID: 14572300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Majantol.
Herro E; Jacob SE
Dermatitis; 2011; 22(2):112-3. PubMed ID: 21504697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of a questionnaire algorithm based on repeated open application testing with the constituents of fragrance mix I.
Bruze M; Engfeldt M; Ofenloch R; Elsner P; Goncalo M; Isaksson M; Naldi L; Schuttelaar ML; Svensson Å; Diepgen T
Br J Dermatol; 2020 Apr; 182(4):955-964. PubMed ID: 31206595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Positive results of patch tests with fragrance markers: analysis of a 15-year period at a Brazilian dermatology center.
Hafner MFS; Munhoz SDG; Jeldes AG; Lazzarini R
An Bras Dermatol; 2018; 93(6):910-912. PubMed ID: 30484545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fragrance contact dermatitis: a worldwide multicenter investigation (Part II).
Larsen W; Nakayama H; Fischer T; Elsner P; Frosch P; Burrows D; Jordan W; Shaw S; Wilkinson J; Marks J; Sugawara M; Nethercott M; Nethercott J
Contact Dermatitis; 2001 Jun; 44(6):344-6. PubMed ID: 11380544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
