These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10209793)
1. Pedicle and transverse process screws of the upper thoracic spine. Biomechanical comparison of loads to failure. Heller JG; Shuster JK; Hutton WC Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Apr; 24(7):654-8. PubMed ID: 10209793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computed tomography and biomechanical evaluation of screw fixation options at the cervicothoracic junction: intralamina versus intrapedicular techniques. Cardoso MJ; Dmitriev AE; Lehman RA; Helgeson M; Cooper P; Rosner MK Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(24):2612-7. PubMed ID: 19011542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pedicle Screw With Increased Cortical Purchase Can Be Inserted With Same Accuracy as the Screw in Straightforward Trajectory Using 3D Modeling Landmarks. Szczodry M; Solitro GF; Amirouche F; Patel P Spine Deform; 2018 Jan; 6(1):20-27. PubMed ID: 29287813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical comparison of translaminar versus pedicle screws at T1 and T2 in long subaxial cervical constructs. McGirt MJ; Sutter EG; Xu R; Sciubba DM; Wolinsky JP; Witham TF; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A Neurosurgery; 2009 Dec; 65(6 Suppl):167-72; discussion 172. PubMed ID: 19934991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Paravertebral foramen screw fixation for posterior cervical spine fusion: biomechanical study and description of a novel technique. Maki S; Aramomi M; Matsuura Y; Furuya T; Ota M; Iijima Y; Saito J; Suzuki T; Mannoji C; Takahashi K; Yamazaki M; Koda M J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):415-420. PubMed ID: 28498072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The biomechanical effect of pedicle screw hubbing on pullout resistance in the thoracic spine. Paik H; Dmitriev AE; Lehman RA; Gaume RE; Ambati DV; Kang DG; Lenke LG Spine J; 2012 May; 12(5):417-24. PubMed ID: 22480532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of a distal expansion mechanism added to a standard pedicle screw on pullout resistance. A biomechanical study. Koller H; Zenner J; Hitzl W; Resch H; Stephan D; Augat P; Penzkofer R; Korn G; Kendell A; Meier O; Mayer M Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):532-41. PubMed ID: 23415899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical contribution of transverse connectors to segmental stability following long segment instrumentation with thoracic pedicle screws. Kuklo TR; Dmitriev AE; Cardoso MJ; Lehman RA; Erickson M; Gill NW Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jul; 33(15):E482-7. PubMed ID: 18594445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical comparison of costotransverse process screw fixation and pedicle screw fixation of the upper thoracic spine. Little AS; Brasiliense LB; Lazaro BC; Reyes PM; Dickman CA; Crawford NR Neurosurgery; 2010 Mar; 66(3 Suppl Operative):178-82; discussion 182. PubMed ID: 20173568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Biomechanical study and digital modeling of traction resistance in posterior thoracic implants]. Gayet LE; Hamcha H; Charbonneau A; Texereau J; Bertheau D; Bellicaud D; Pries P Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2001 Sep; 87(5):459-68. PubMed ID: 11547233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Axial and tangential fixation strength of pedicle screws versus hooks in the thoracic spine in relation to bone mineral density. Hackenberg L; Link T; Liljenqvist U Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 May; 27(9):937-42. PubMed ID: 11979165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of physiological loads on cortical and traditional pedicle screw fixation. Baluch DA; Patel AA; Lullo B; Havey RM; Voronov LI; Nguyen NL; Carandang G; Ghanayem AJ; Patwardhan AG Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Oct; 39(22):E1297-302. PubMed ID: 25099320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: a comparison of image-guided and manual techniques in cadavers. Hart RA; Hansen BL; Shea M; Hsu F; Anderson GJ Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jun; 30(12):E326-31. PubMed ID: 15959355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pedicle screw "hubbing" in the immature thoracic spine: a biomechanical and micro-computed tomography evaluation. Kang DG; Lehman RA; Bevevino AJ; Gaume RE; Purcell RL; Dmitriev AE; Lenke LG J Pediatr Orthop; 2014; 34(7):703-9. PubMed ID: 24590340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Which salvage fixation technique is best for the failed initial screw fixation at the cervicothoracic junction? A biomechanical comparison study. Hong JT; Tomoyuki T; Jain A; OrĂas AAE; Inoue N; An HS Eur Spine J; 2017 Sep; 26(9):2417-2424. PubMed ID: 28752245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Considerations for the use of C7 crossing laminar screws in subaxial and cervicothoracic instrumentation. Ilgenfritz RM; Gandhi AA; Fredericks DC; Grosland NM; Smucker JD Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Feb; 38(4):E199-204. PubMed ID: 23169075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pedicle instrumentation in the thoracic spine. A morphometric and cadaveric study for placement of screws. Cinotti G; Gumina S; Ripani M; Postacchini F Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Jan; 24(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 9926379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Morphometric comparison of the pedicle rib unit to pedicles in the thoracic spine. Husted DS; Haims AH; Fairchild TA; Kershaw TS; Yue JJ Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Jan; 29(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 14722404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preventing distal pullout of posterior spine instrumentation in thoracic hyperkyphosis: a biomechanical analysis. Sun E; Alkalay R; Vader D; Snyder BD J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Jun; 22(4):270-7. PubMed ID: 19494747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]