These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10209811)

  • 1. Methods for combining rates from several studies.
    Zhou XH; Brizendine EJ; Pritz MB
    Stat Med; 1999 Mar; 18(5):557-66. PubMed ID: 10209811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Studentized bootstrap model-averaged tail area intervals.
    Zeng J; Fletcher D; Dillingham PW; Cornwall CE
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213715. PubMed ID: 30883568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Individual participant data meta-analysis of continuous outcomes: A comparison of approaches for specifying and estimating one-stage models.
    Legha A; Riley RD; Ensor J; Snell KIE; Morris TP; Burke DL
    Stat Med; 2018 Dec; 37(29):4404-4420. PubMed ID: 30101507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of bootstrap approaches for estimating uncertainty of parameters in linear mixed-effects models.
    Thai HT; Mentré F; Holford NH; Veyrat-Follet C; Comets E
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(3):129-40. PubMed ID: 23457061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Confidence intervals for intraclass correlation coefficients in a nonlinear dose-response meta-analysis.
    Demetrashvili N; Van den Heuvel ER
    Biometrics; 2015 Jun; 71(2):548-55. PubMed ID: 25703393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Standard errors and confidence intervals for correlations corrected for indirect range restriction: A simulation study comparing analytic and bootstrap methods.
    Kennet-Cohen T; Kleper D; Turvall E
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 Feb; 71(1):39-59. PubMed ID: 28631350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A multilevel model framework for meta-analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes.
    Turner RM; Omar RZ; Yang M; Goldstein H; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 2000 Dec; 19(24):3417-32. PubMed ID: 11122505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bootstrap confidence intervals for the mean correlation corrected for Case IV range restriction: a more adequate procedure for meta-analysis.
    Li JC; Cui Y; Chan W
    J Appl Psychol; 2013 Jan; 98(1):183-93. PubMed ID: 23088495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transforming the Model T: random effects meta-analysis with stable weights.
    Malloy MJ; Prendergast LA; Staudte RG
    Stat Med; 2013 May; 32(11):1842-64. PubMed ID: 23097338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Confidence intervals for heterogeneity measures in meta-analysis.
    Takkouche B; Khudyakov P; Costa-Bouzas J; Spiegelman D
    Am J Epidemiol; 2013 Sep; 178(6):993-1004. PubMed ID: 23921232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A likelihood approach to meta-analysis with random effects.
    Hardy RJ; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 1996 Mar; 15(6):619-29. PubMed ID: 8731004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Confidence intervals for random effects meta-analysis and robustness to publication bias.
    Henmi M; Copas JB
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(29):2969-83. PubMed ID: 20963748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of bootstrap methods for estimating sample size and analysing health-related quality of life outcomes.
    Walters SJ; Campbell MJ
    Stat Med; 2005 Apr; 24(7):1075-102. PubMed ID: 15570625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of statistical methods for meta-analysis.
    Brockwell SE; Gordon IR
    Stat Med; 2001 Mar; 20(6):825-40. PubMed ID: 11252006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Random effects meta-analysis of event outcome in the framework of the generalized linear mixed model with applications in sparse data.
    Stijnen T; Hamza TH; Ozdemir P
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(29):3046-67. PubMed ID: 20827667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman approach and its modification for random-effects meta-analysis with few studies.
    Röver C; Knapp G; Friede T
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Nov; 15():99. PubMed ID: 26573817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Confidence intervals for the overall effect size in random-effects meta-analysis.
    Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Mar; 13(1):31-48. PubMed ID: 18331152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A semi-parametric estimate of extra-Poisson variation for vital rates.
    Fay MP; Feuer EJ
    Stat Med; 1997 Nov; 16(21):2389-401. PubMed ID: 9364649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modified robust variance estimator for generalized estimating equations with improved small-sample performance.
    Wang M; Long Q
    Stat Med; 2011 May; 30(11):1278-91. PubMed ID: 21538453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.