These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10209812)
1. Estimation of the average correlation coefficient for stratified bivariate data. Rubenstein LM; Davis CS Stat Med; 1999 Mar; 18(5):567-80. PubMed ID: 10209812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk analysis in cohort studies with heterogeneous strata. A global chi2-test for dose-response relationship, generalizing the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. Ahlborn W; Tuz HJ; Uberla K Methods Inf Med; 1990 Mar; 29(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 2342429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Moving beyond the conventional stratified analysis to estimate an overall treatment efficacy with the data from a comparative randomized clinical study. Tian L; Jiang F; Hasegawa T; Uno H; Pfeffer M; Wei LJ Stat Med; 2019 Mar; 38(6):917-932. PubMed ID: 30352486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A note on interval estimation of kappa in a series of 2 x 2 tables. Lui KJ; Kelly C Stat Med; 1999 Aug; 18(15):2041-9. PubMed ID: 10440885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Eight interval estimators of a common rate ratio under stratified Poisson sampling. Lui KJ Stat Med; 2004 Apr; 23(8):1283-96. PubMed ID: 15083483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A variance estimator for constrained estimates of change in relative categorical frequencies. Magnussen S; Köhl M Environ Monit Assess; 2005 Jun; 105(1-3):391-410. PubMed ID: 15952530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimation of a common odds ratio under binary cluster sampling. Ahn C; Odom-Maryon T Stat Med; 1995 Jul; 14(14):1567-76. PubMed ID: 7481193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Randomization model methods for evaluating treatment efficacy in multicenter clinical trials. Davis CS; Chung Y Biometrics; 1995 Sep; 51(3):1163-74. PubMed ID: 7548700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interval estimation of the difference in proportions under m-to-one matching. Lui KJ Stat Med; 2005 Jun; 24(11):1765-76. PubMed ID: 15736281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation. Schober P; Boer C; Schwarte LA Anesth Analg; 2018 May; 126(5):1763-1768. PubMed ID: 29481436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Confidence intervals for intraclass correlation coefficients in variance components models. Demetrashvili N; Wit EC; van den Heuvel ER Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Oct; 25(5):2359-2376. PubMed ID: 24535554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Large Sample Confidence Intervals for Item Response Theory Reliability Coefficients. Andersson B; Xin T Educ Psychol Meas; 2018 Feb; 78(1):32-45. PubMed ID: 29795945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analyzing bivariate continuous data grouped into categories defined by empirical quantiles of marginal distributions. Borkowf CB; Gail MH; Carroll RJ; Gill RD Biometrics; 1997 Sep; 53(3):1054-69. PubMed ID: 9290229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in community-based cluster randomization trials with a binary outcome. Braschel MC; Svec I; Darlington GA; Donner A Clin Trials; 2016 Apr; 13(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 26415500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A new and improved confidence interval for the Mantel-Haenszel risk difference. Klingenberg B Stat Med; 2014 Jul; 33(17):2968-83. PubMed ID: 24599880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Generalized Mantel-Haenszel estimators for K 2 x J tables. Greenland S Biometrics; 1989 Mar; 45(1):183-91. PubMed ID: 2720051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The analysis of stratified 2 x 2 contingency tables. Berger VW; Stefanescu C; Zhou YY Biom J; 2006 Dec; 48(6):992-1007. PubMed ID: 17240657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The analysis of 2 x 1 and 2 x 2 contingency tables: an historical review. Richardson JT Stat Methods Med Res; 1994; 3(2):107-33. PubMed ID: 7952428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Power and sample size evaluation for the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel mean score (Wilcoxon rank sum) test and the Cochran-Armitage test for trend. Lachin JM Stat Med; 2011 Nov; 30(25):3057-66. PubMed ID: 22006667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An Empirical Bayes Mixture Model for Effect Size Distributions in Genome-Wide Association Studies. Thompson WK; Wang Y; Schork AJ; Witoelar A; Zuber V; Xu S; Werge T; Holland D; ; Andreassen OA; Dale AM PLoS Genet; 2015 Dec; 11(12):e1005717. PubMed ID: 26714184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]