293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10209813)
1. Bootstrap approach for constructing confidence intervals for population pharmacokinetic parameters. I: A use of bootstrap standard error.
Yafune A; Ishiguro M
Stat Med; 1999 Mar; 18(5):581-99. PubMed ID: 10209813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bootstrap approach for constructing confidence intervals for population pharmacokinetic parameters. II: A bootstrap modification of standard two-stage (STS) method for phase I trial.
Yafune A; Ishiguro M
Stat Med; 1999 Mar; 18(5):601-12. PubMed ID: 10209814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimating inestimable standard errors in population pharmacokinetic studies: the bootstrap with Winsorization.
Ette EI; Onyiah LC
Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet; 2002; 27(3):213-24. PubMed ID: 12365204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Profile likelihood-based confidence intervals using Monte Carlo integration for population pharmacokinetic parameters.
Funatogawa T; Funatogawa I; Yafune A
J Biopharm Stat; 2006; 16(2):193-205. PubMed ID: 16584067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Constructing Confidence Intervals for Effect Size Measures of an Indirect Effect.
Lee S; Lei MK; Brody GH
Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(6):600-13. PubMed ID: 26717121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Standard errors and confidence intervals for correlations corrected for indirect range restriction: A simulation study comparing analytic and bootstrap methods.
Kennet-Cohen T; Kleper D; Turvall E
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 Feb; 71(1):39-59. PubMed ID: 28631350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modification of pharmacokinetic sampling schedules in clinical phase I trials: a use of Kullback-Leibler information.
Yafune A; Ishiguro M
Stat Med; 2001 Apr; 20(7):1033-49. PubMed ID: 11276034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Profile-likelihood Confidence Intervals in Item Response Theory Models.
Chalmers RP; Pek J; Liu Y
Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(5):533-550. PubMed ID: 28594582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Application of the bootstrap procedure provides an alternative to standard statistical procedures in the estimation of the vitamin B-6 requirement.
Hansen CM; Evans MA; Shultz TD
J Nutr; 1999 Oct; 129(10):1915-9. PubMed ID: 10498768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bootstrap standard error and confidence intervals for the correlations corrected for indirect range restriction.
Li JC; Chan W; Cui Y
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):367-87. PubMed ID: 21973092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Parametric modelling of cost data in medical studies.
Nixon RM; Thompson SG
Stat Med; 2004 Apr; 23(8):1311-31. PubMed ID: 15083485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bootstrap standard error and confidence intervals for the correlation corrected for range restriction: a simulation study.
Chan W; Chan DW
Psychol Methods; 2004 Sep; 9(3):369-85. PubMed ID: 15355154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantification of variability and uncertainty for censored data sets and application to air toxic emission factors.
Zhao Y; Frey HC
Risk Anal; 2004 Aug; 24(4):1019-34. PubMed ID: 15357825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of bootstrap methods for estimating sample size and analysing health-related quality of life outcomes.
Walters SJ; Campbell MJ
Stat Med; 2005 Apr; 24(7):1075-102. PubMed ID: 15570625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Non-compartmental estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters in serial sampling designs.
Wolfsegger MJ; Jaki T
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2009 Oct; 36(5):479-94. PubMed ID: 19847629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing the uncertainty in QUANTEC's dose-response relation of lung and spinal cord with a bootstrap analysis.
Wedenberg M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Nov; 87(4):795-801. PubMed ID: 23953634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of confidence intervals for adjusted attributable risk estimates under multinomial sampling.
Lehnert-Batar A; Pfahlberg A; Gefeller O
Biom J; 2006 Aug; 48(5):805-19. PubMed ID: 17094345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Small-sample confidence sets for the MTD in a phase I clinical trial.
Storer BE
Biometrics; 1993 Dec; 49(4):1117-25. PubMed ID: 8117905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
