These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10210500)

  • 1. Relationship between shock energy and postdefibrillation ventricular arrhythmias in patients with implantable defibrillators.
    Zivin A; Souza J; Pelosi F; Flemming M; Knight BP; Goyal R; Morady F; Strickberger SA
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1999 Mar; 10(3):370-7. PubMed ID: 10210500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Upper limit of vulnerability is a good estimator of shock strength associated with 90% probability of successful defibrillation in humans with transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.
    Swerdlow CD; Ahern T; Kass RM; Davie S; Mandel WJ; Chen PS
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Apr; 27(5):1112-8. PubMed ID: 8609329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A prospective evaluation of two defibrillation safety margin techniques in patients with low defibrillation energy requirements.
    Strickberger SA; Man KC; Souza J; Zivin A; Weiss R; Knight BP; Goyal R; Daoud EG; Morady F
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1998 Jan; 9(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 9475576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High dispersion of ventricular repolarization after an implantable defibrillator shock predicts induction of ventricular fibrillation as well as unsuccessful defibrillation.
    Moubarak JB; Karasik PE; Fletcher RD; Franz MR
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2000 Feb; 35(2):422-7. PubMed ID: 10676690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of ventricular shock strength on cardiac hemodynamics.
    Tokano T; Bach D; Chang J; Davis J; Souza JJ; Zivin A; Knight BP; Goyal R; Man KC; Morady F; Strickberger SA
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1998 Aug; 9(8):791-7. PubMed ID: 9727657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inductionless or limited shock testing is possible in most patients with implantable cardioverter- defibrillators/cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators: results of the multicenter ASSURE Study (Arrhythmia Single Shock Defibrillation Threshold Testing Versus Upper Limit of Vulnerability: Risk Reduction Evaluation With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantations).
    Day JD; Doshi RN; Belott P; Birgersdotter-Green U; Behboodikhah M; Ott P; Glatter KA; Tobias S; Frumin H; Lee BK; Merillat J; Wiener I; Wang S; Grogin H; Chun S; Patrawalla R; Crandall B; Osborn JS; Weiss JP; Lappe DL; Neuman S
    Circulation; 2007 May; 115(18):2382-9. PubMed ID: 17470697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Energy levels for defibrillation: what is of real clinical importance?
    Fotuhi PC; Epstein AE; Ideker RE
    Am J Cardiol; 1999 Mar; 83(5B):24D-33D. PubMed ID: 10089836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Probability of successful defibrillation at multiples of the defibrillation energy requirement in patients with an implantable defibrillator.
    Strickberger SA; Daoud EG; Davidson T; Weiss R; Bogun F; Knight BP; Bahu M; Goyal R; Man KC; Morady F
    Circulation; 1997 Aug; 96(4):1217-23. PubMed ID: 9286952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Programming of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators on the basis of the upper limit of vulnerability.
    Swerdlow CD; Peter CT; Kass RM; Gang ES; Mandel WJ; Hwang C; Martin DJ; Chen PS
    Circulation; 1997 Mar; 95(6):1497-504. PubMed ID: 9118518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Low-energy endocardial defibrillation using an axillary or a pectoral thoracic electrode location.
    Saksena S; DeGroot P; Krol RB; Raju R; Mathew P; Mehra R
    Circulation; 1993 Dec; 88(6):2655-60. PubMed ID: 8252676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of biphasic and monophasic shocks for external defibrillation. Physio-Control Biphasic Investigators.
    Higgins SL; Herre JM; Epstein AE; Greer GS; Friedman PL; Gleva ML; Porterfield JG; Chapman FW; Finkel ES; Schmitt PW; Nova RC; Greene HL
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2000; 4(4):305-13. PubMed ID: 11045408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Etiology and Programming Effects on Shock Efficacy in ICD Recipients.
    Bertomeu-González V; Moreno-Arribas J; Castillo-Castillo J; Martínez-Ferrer J; Viñolas X; Rodríguez A; Díaz-Infante E; Fernández-Lozano I; Alzueta J; Fontenla A
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2016 Jan; 39(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 26450114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shock timing lowers transvenous defibrillation energy requirement.
    Hsu W; Lin Y; Lang DJ; Jones JL
    J Electrocardiol; 1998; 31 Suppl():35-40. PubMed ID: 9988003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correlation of acute and chronic defibrillation threshold with upper limit of vulnerability determined in normal sinus rhythm.
    Birgersdotter-Green U; Undesser K; Fujimura O; Feld GK; Kass RM; Mandel WJ; Peter CT; Chen PS
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1999 Jul; 3(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 10387143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ventricular fibrillation induced by low-energy shocks from programmable implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with coronary artery disease.
    Lauer MR; Young C; Liem LB; Ottoboni L; Peterson J; Goold P; Sung RJ
    Am J Cardiol; 1994 Mar; 73(8):559-63. PubMed ID: 8147300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of shock timing on efficacy and safety of internal cardioversion for ventricular tachycardia.
    Li HG; Yee R; Mehra R; DeGroot P; Klein GJ; Zardini M; Thakur RK; Morillo CA
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Sep; 24(3):703-8. PubMed ID: 8077542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Safety of transvenous low energy cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in patients with a history of ventricular tachycardia: effects of rate and repolarization time on proarrhythmic risk.
    Simons GR; Newby KH; Kearney MM; Brandon MJ; Natale A
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Feb; 21(2):430-7. PubMed ID: 9507545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Timing of defibrillation shocks for resuscitation of rapid ventricular tachycardia: does it make a difference?
    Turner I; Turner S; Grace AA
    Resuscitation; 2009 Feb; 80(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 19091453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transthoracic defibrillation of short-lasting ventricular fibrillation: a randomised trial for comparison of the efficacy of low-energy biphasic rectilinear and monophasic damped sine shocks.
    Szili-Torok T; Theuns D; Verblaauw T; Scholten M; Kimman GJ; Res J; Jordaens L
    Acta Cardiol; 2002 Oct; 57(5):329-34. PubMed ID: 12405569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Shock-induced, but not terminated ventricular tachycardia in a patient with implantable defibrillator].
    Kühlkamp V; Dörnberger V; Mermi J; Mewis C; Seipel L
    Z Kardiol; 1996 May; 85(5):306-11. PubMed ID: 8711942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.