163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10210759)
1. [Meta-analyses of randomized trials in oncology: pros and cons].
Hill C; Pignon JP
Bull Cancer; 1999 Mar; 86(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 10210759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Meta-analyses on individual patient data and treatment evaluation in oncology].
Pignon JP; Aupérin A; Hill C
Bull Cancer; 2007 Nov; 94(11):957-64. PubMed ID: 18055313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnitude of benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Bria E; Gralla RJ; Raftopoulos H; Cuppone F; Milella M; Sperduti I; Carlini P; Terzoli E; Cognetti F; Giannarelli D
Lung Cancer; 2009 Jan; 63(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 18565615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis.
Tierney JF; Stewart LA
Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 34(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 15561753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of the results of checked versus unchecked individual patient data meta-analyses.
Burdett S; Stewart LA
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2002; 18(3):619-24. PubMed ID: 12391954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Role of meta-analyses and of large randomized trials in the study of cancer treatments.
Pignon JP; Auperin A; Borget I; Hill C
Lung Cancer; 2009 Jul; 65(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 19059671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Individual patient-level and study-level meta-analysis for investigating modifiers of treatment effect.
Teramukai S; Matsuyama Y; Mizuno S; Sakamoto J
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2004 Dec; 34(12):717-21. PubMed ID: 15640501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Meta-analysis of rare events: an update and sensitivity analysis of cardiovascular events in randomized trials of rosiglitazone.
Dahabreh IJ; Economopoulos K
Clin Trials; 2008; 5(2):116-20. PubMed ID: 18375649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Evaluation of the pediatric aspects of the WHO document and meta-analysis of immunotherapy].
Ibáñez Sendín MD
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr); 2000; 28(3):82-9. PubMed ID: 10867375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Value of the Cochrane Collaboration: the point of view of meta-analysis practitioner].
Pignon JP
Therapie; 1996; 51(3):257-60. PubMed ID: 8881118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A new and rapid scoring system to assess the scientific evidence from clinical trials.
Silber S
J Interv Cardiol; 2006 Dec; 19(6):485-92. PubMed ID: 17107362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The method of conducting randomized trials in cancerology must be changed].
Hill C
Bull Cancer; 2002 Sep; 89(9):823-5. PubMed ID: 12368134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Random effects survival models gave a better understanding of heterogeneity in individual patient data meta-analyses.
Michiels S; Baujat B; Mahé C; Sargent DJ; Pignon JP
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Mar; 58(3):238-45. PubMed ID: 15718112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robustness assessments are needed to reduce bias in meta-analyses that include zero-event randomized trials.
Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Mar; 104(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 19262513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Evidence-based radiotherapy in the treatment of operable breast cancer: results in the 1990-ies].
Fodor J; Polgár C; Németh G
Orv Hetil; 2000 Jul; 141(28):1551-5. PubMed ID: 10957865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Meta-analysis in medical research: potentials and limitations.
Zwahlen M; Renehan A; Egger M
Urol Oncol; 2008; 26(3):320-9. PubMed ID: 18452828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing the reporting and scientific quality of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of treatments for anxiety disorders.
Bereza BG; Machado M; Einarson TR
Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Oct; 42(10):1402-9. PubMed ID: 18728102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factorial design provides evidence to guide practice of anaesthesia.
Korttila K; Apfel CC
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2005 Aug; 49(7):927-9. PubMed ID: 16045652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Polyclonal intravenous immunoglobulin for the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock in critically ill adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Laupland KB; Kirkpatrick AW; Delaney A
Crit Care Med; 2007 Dec; 35(12):2686-92. PubMed ID: 18074465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
