These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10211239)

  • 1. Counting apples with oranges: a limitation of the discrimination index.
    Hobsley M
    Med Educ; 1999 Mar; 33(3):192-6. PubMed ID: 10211239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationship between item difficulty and discrimination indices in true/false-type multiple choice questions of a para-clinical multidisciplinary paper.
    Sim SM; Rasiah RI
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 2006 Feb; 35(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 16565756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of MCQ and distractor use in a large first year Health Faculty Foundation Program: assessing the effects of changing from five to four options.
    Fozzard N; Pearson A; du Toit E; Naug H; Wen W; Peak IR
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Nov; 18(1):252. PubMed ID: 30404624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Psychometrics of Multiple Choice Questions with Non-Functioning Distracters: Implications to Medical Education.
    Deepak KK; Al-Umran KU; AI-Sheikh MH; Dkoli BV; Al-Rubaish A
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2015; 59(4):428-35. PubMed ID: 27530011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer review improves psychometric characteristics of multiple choice questions.
    Abozaid H; Park YS; Tekian A
    Med Teach; 2017 Apr; 39(sup1):S50-S54. PubMed ID: 28103718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multiple-choice testing in anatomy.
    Nnodim JO
    Med Educ; 1992 Jul; 26(4):301-9. PubMed ID: 1630332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Test-retest reliability of multiple true-false questions in preclinical medical subjects.
    Schwartz PL; Crooks TJ; Sein KT
    Med Educ; 1986 Sep; 20(5):399-406. PubMed ID: 3762442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using Automatic Item Generation to Improve the Quality of MCQ Distractors.
    Lai H; Gierl MJ; Touchie C; Pugh D; Boulais AP; De Champlain A
    Teach Learn Med; 2016; 28(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 26849247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input.
    Harris BH; Walsh JL; Tayyaba S; Harris DA; Wilson DJ; Smith PE
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 25893940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. GMC must not recommend abolition of united examining Board's examination.
    Gibberd FB
    BMJ; 1998 May; 316(7141):1386-7. PubMed ID: 9564006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiple true-false items: a comparison of scoring algorithms.
    Lahner FM; Lörwald AC; Bauer D; Nouns ZM; Krebs R; Guttormsen S; Fischer MR; Huwendiek S
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2018 Aug; 23(3):455-463. PubMed ID: 29189963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring higher cognitive levels by multiple choice questions: a myth?
    Ferland JJ; Dorval J; Levasseur L
    Med Educ; 1987 Mar; 21(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 3574161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of the performance of three multiple choice question papers in obstetrics and gynaecology over a period of three years administered at five London medical schools.
    Stevens JM; Harris FT; Fairweather DV; Huntingford P; Steele SJ; Hudson C; Coltart T; Paintin D
    Med Educ; 1977 May; 11(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 865339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of one-best MCQs: the difficulty index, discrimination index and distractor efficiency.
    Hingorjo MR; Jaleel F
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2012 Feb; 62(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 22755376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. International variation in performance by clinical discipline and task on the United States medical licensing examination step 2 clinical knowledge component.
    Holtzman KZ; Swanson DB; Ouyang W; Dillon GF; Boulet JR
    Acad Med; 2014 Nov; 89(11):1558-62. PubMed ID: 25250743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The integrated anatomy practical paper: A robust assessment method for anatomy education today.
    Smith CF; McManus B
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 24706567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is a picture worth a thousand words: an analysis of the difficulty and discrimination parameters of illustrated vs. text-alone vignettes in histology multiple choice questions.
    Holland J; O'Sullivan R; Arnett R
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Oct; 15():184. PubMed ID: 26502882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reducing the number of options on multiple-choice questions: response time, psychometrics and standard setting.
    Schneid SD; Armour C; Park YS; Yudkowsky R; Bordage G
    Med Educ; 2014 Oct; 48(10):1020-7. PubMed ID: 25200022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In-training examinations for residents in obstetrics and gynecology, 1975 to 1978.
    Easterling WE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Apr; 133(7):733-41. PubMed ID: 434018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The criteria and analysis of good multiple choice questions in a health professional setting.
    Abdel-Hameed AA; Al-Faris EA; Alorainy IA; Al-Rukban MO
    Saudi Med J; 2005 Oct; 26(10):1505-10. PubMed ID: 16228046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.