These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Spatial frequency discrimination and detection characteristics for gratings defined by orientation texture. Gray R; Regan D Vision Res; 1998 Sep; 38(17):2601-17. PubMed ID: 12116706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interactions among spatial frequency and orientation channels adapted concurrently. Greenlee MW; Magnussen S Vision Res; 1988; 28(12):1303-10. PubMed ID: 3256147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Vernier step acuity and bisection acuity for texture-defined form. Gray R; Regan D Vision Res; 1997 Jul; 37(13):1717-23. PubMed ID: 9274758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Texture segregation with luminance and chromatic contrast. McIlhagga W; Hine T; Cole GR; Snyder AW Vision Res; 1990; 30(3):489-95. PubMed ID: 2336806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The time course of adaptation to spatial contrast. Greenlee MW; Georgeson MA; Magnussen S; Harris JP Vision Res; 1991; 31(2):223-36. PubMed ID: 2017883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Vernier acuity with plaid masks: the role of oriented filters in vernier acuity. Mussap AJ; Levi DM Vision Res; 1997 May; 37(10):1325-40. PubMed ID: 9205724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of contrast and temporal frequency on orientation discrimination for luminance and isoluminant stimuli. Reisbeck TE; Gegenfurtner KR Vision Res; 1998 Apr; 38(8):1105-17. PubMed ID: 9666970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dissociation of orientation discrimination from form detection for motion-defined bars and luminance-defined bars: effects of dot lifetime and presentation duration. Regan D; Hamstra SJ Vision Res; 1992 Sep; 32(9):1655-66. PubMed ID: 1455737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contrast discrimination cannot explain spatial frequency, orientation or temporal frequency discrimination. Bowne SF Vision Res; 1990; 30(3):449-61. PubMed ID: 2336803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perceived contrast following adaptation: the role of adapting stimulus visibility. Barrett BT; McGraw PV; Morrill P Spat Vis; 2002; 16(1):5-19. PubMed ID: 12636221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Some observations on the masking effects of two-dimensional stimuli. Derrington AM; Henning GB Vision Res; 1989; 29(2):241-6. PubMed ID: 2800350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of contrast and adaptation on the perception of the direction and speed of drifting gratings. Müller R; Greenlee MW Vision Res; 1994 Aug; 34(16):2071-92. PubMed ID: 7941406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spatial frequency discrimination in cyclopean vision. Grove PM; Regan D Vision Res; 2002 Jul; 42(15):1837-46. PubMed ID: 12128014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contrast, spatial frequency and test duration effects on the tilt aftereffect: implications for underlying mechanisms. Harris JP; Calvert JE Vision Res; 1989; 29(1):129-35. PubMed ID: 2773330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]