260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10211381)
1. Monocular occlusion cues alter the influence of terminator motion in the barber pole phenomenon.
Lidén L; Mingolla E
Vision Res; 1998 Dec; 38(24):3883-98. PubMed ID: 10211381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Disparity biasing in depth from monocular occlusions.
Tsirlin I; Wilcox LM; Allison RS
Vision Res; 2011 Jul; 51(14):1699-711. PubMed ID: 21651926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Occlusion and the solution to visual motion ambiguity: Looking beyond the aperture problem.
van der Smagt MJ; Stoner GR
J Vis; 2008 Feb; 8(2):4.1-12. PubMed ID: 18318630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interaction of stereo vision and optic flow processing revealed by an illusory stimulus.
Grigo A; Lappe M
Vision Res; 1998 Jan; 38(2):281-90. PubMed ID: 9536354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Occlusion and the solution to the aperture problem for motion.
Shimojo S; Silverman GH; Nakayama K
Vision Res; 1989; 29(5):619-26. PubMed ID: 2603398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Phantom surface captures stereopsis.
Häkkinen J; Nyman G
Vision Res; 2001 Jan; 41(2):187-99. PubMed ID: 11163853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Speed discrimination of motion-in-depth using binocular cues.
Harris JM; Watamaniuk SN
Vision Res; 1995 Apr; 35(7):885-96. PubMed ID: 7762146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prior depth information can bias motion perception.
Graf EW; Adams WJ; Lages M
J Vis; 2004 May; 4(6):427-33. PubMed ID: 15330710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Apparent motion of monocular stimuli in different depth planes with lateral head movements.
Shimono K; Tam WJ; Ono H
Vision Res; 2007 Apr; 47(8):1027-35. PubMed ID: 17337029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A new look at binocular stereopsis.
Pizlo Z; Li Y; Francis G
Vision Res; 2005 Aug; 45(17):2244-55. PubMed ID: 15924939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The extrinsic/intrinsic classification of two-dimensional motion signals with barber-pole stimuli.
Castet E; Charton V; Dufour A
Vision Res; 1999 Mar; 39(5):915-32. PubMed ID: 10341945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stereo and motion disparities interfere with positional averaging.
Harris JM; Morgan MJ
Vision Res; 1993 Feb; 33(3):309-12. PubMed ID: 8447103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contributions of binocular and monocular cues to motion-in-depth perception.
Thompson L; Ji M; Rokers B; Rosenberg A
J Vis; 2019 Mar; 19(3):2. PubMed ID: 30836382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monocular occlusions determine the perceived shape and depth of occluding surfaces.
Tsirlin I; Wilcox LM; Allison RS
J Vis; 2010 Jun; 10(6):11. PubMed ID: 20884560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Illusory occlusion affects stereoscopic depth perception.
Chen Z; Denison RN; Whitney D; Maus GW
Sci Rep; 2018 Mar; 8(1):5297. PubMed ID: 29593236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surface segmentation mechanisms and motion perception.
Trueswell JC; Hayhoe MM
Vision Res; 1993 Feb; 33(3):313-28. PubMed ID: 8447104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perception of scene-relative object movement: Optic flow parsing and the contribution of monocular depth cues.
Warren PA; Rushton SK
Vision Res; 2009 May; 49(11):1406-19. PubMed ID: 19480063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative perceived depth from sequential monocular decamouflage.
Brooks KR; Gillam BJ
Vision Res; 2006 Mar; 46(5):605-13. PubMed ID: 16054190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The cyclopean (stereoscopic) barber pole illusion.
Patterson R; Bowd C; Donnelly M
Vision Res; 1998 Jul; 38(14):2119-25. PubMed ID: 9797972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Monocular depth effects on perceptual fading.
Hsu LC; Kramer P; Yeh SL
Vision Res; 2010 Aug; 50(17):1649-55. PubMed ID: 20580732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
