BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10211816)

  • 1. CORA--topological fingerprints for protein structural families.
    Orengo CA
    Protein Sci; 1999 Apr; 8(4):699-715. PubMed ID: 10211816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An integrated approach to the analysis and modeling of protein sequences and structures. III. A comparative study of sequence conservation in protein structural families using multiple structural alignments.
    Yang AS; Honig B
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Aug; 301(3):691-711. PubMed ID: 10966778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Structural diversity of domain superfamilies in the CATH database.
    Reeves GA; Dallman TJ; Redfern OC; Akpor A; Orengo CA
    J Mol Biol; 2006 Jul; 360(3):725-41. PubMed ID: 16780872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Regions of minimal structural variation among members of protein domain superfamilies: application to remote homology detection and modelling using distant relationships.
    Chakrabarti S; Sowdhamini R
    FEBS Lett; 2004 Jul; 569(1-3):31-6. PubMed ID: 15225604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Alignment and searching for common protein folds using a data bank of structural templates.
    Johnson MS; Overington JP; Blundell TL
    J Mol Biol; 1993 Jun; 231(3):735-52. PubMed ID: 8515448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Residue-residue contact substitution probabilities derived from aligned three-dimensional structures and the identification of common folds.
    Rodionov MA; Johnson MS
    Protein Sci; 1994 Dec; 3(12):2366-77. PubMed ID: 7756991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. FAST: a novel protein structure alignment algorithm.
    Zhu J; Weng Z
    Proteins; 2005 Feb; 58(3):618-27. PubMed ID: 15609341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fragment ranking in modelling of protein structure. Conformationally constrained environmental amino acid substitution tables.
    Topham CM; McLeod A; Eisenmenger F; Overington JP; Johnson MS; Blundell TL
    J Mol Biol; 1993 Jan; 229(1):194-220. PubMed ID: 8421300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. DPANN: improved sequence to structure alignments following fold recognition.
    Reinhardt A; Eisenberg D
    Proteins; 2004 Aug; 56(3):528-38. PubMed ID: 15229885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sequence comparison and protein structure prediction.
    Dunbrack RL
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2006 Jun; 16(3):374-84. PubMed ID: 16713709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Generation of 3D templates of active sites of proteins with rigid prosthetic groups.
    Nebel JC
    Bioinformatics; 2006 May; 22(10):1183-9. PubMed ID: 16473871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. SSToSS--sequence-structural templates of single-member superfamilies.
    Chakrabarti S; Manohari G; Pugalenthi G; Sowdhamini R
    In Silico Biol; 2006; 6(4):311-9. PubMed ID: 16922694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Protein structure prediction of CASP5 comparative modeling and fold recognition targets using consensus alignment approach and 3D assessment.
    Ginalski K; Rychlewski L
    Proteins; 2003; 53 Suppl 6():410-7. PubMed ID: 14579329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multiple structural alignment for distantly related all beta structures using TOPS pattern discovery and simulated annealing.
    Williams A; Gilbert DR; Westhead DR
    Protein Eng; 2003 Dec; 16(12):913-23. PubMed ID: 14983071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automatic generation and evaluation of sparse protein signatures for families of protein structural domains.
    Blades MJ; Ison JC; Ranasinghe R; Findlay JB
    Protein Sci; 2005 Jan; 14(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 15608116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An integrated approach to the analysis and modeling of protein sequences and structures. I. Protein structural alignment and a quantitative measure for protein structural distance.
    Yang AS; Honig B
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Aug; 301(3):665-78. PubMed ID: 10966776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterizing conserved structural contacts by pair-wise relative contacts and relative packing groups.
    Holmes JB; Tsai J
    J Mol Biol; 2005 Dec; 354(3):706-21. PubMed ID: 16269154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of conformational characteristics in structurally similar protein pairs.
    Flores TP; Orengo CA; Moss DS; Thornton JM
    Protein Sci; 1993 Nov; 2(11):1811-26. PubMed ID: 8268794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A simple topological representation of protein structure: implications for new, fast, and robust structural classification.
    Bostick DL; Shen M; Vaisman II
    Proteins; 2004 Aug; 56(3):487-501. PubMed ID: 15229882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recognition of remotely related structural homologues using sequence profiles of aligned homologous protein structures.
    Namboori S; Srinivasan N; Pandit SB
    In Silico Biol; 2004; 4(4):445-60. PubMed ID: 15506994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.