These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10212035)

  • 1. Constitutional rights and hypnotically elicited testimony.
    Newman AW; Thompson JW
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(1):149-54. PubMed ID: 10212035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rock v. Arkansas: hypnosis, the defendant's privilege.
    Orne MT; Dinges DF; Orne EC
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1990 Oct; 38(4):250-65. PubMed ID: 2258243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hypnosis with a criminal defendant and a crime witness: two recent related cases.
    Perry C; Laurence JR
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1990 Oct; 38(4):266-82. PubMed ID: 2258244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The admissibility of hypnotic evidence in U.S. Courts.
    Giannelli PC
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1995 Apr; 43(2):212-33. PubMed ID: 7737764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rock v. Arkansas: a critique.
    Udolf R
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1990 Oct; 38(4):239-49. PubMed ID: 2258242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
    Brown HO
    Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Admissibility and per se exclusion of hypnotically elicited recall in American courts of law.
    Perry C
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1997 Jul; 45(3):266-79. PubMed ID: 9204639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The judicial side effects of involuntary medication as it relates to a criminal defendant's right to a fair trial: Riggins v. Nevada.
    Gutierrez L
    Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1994; 19(2):355-77. PubMed ID: 11660111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Constitutional challenges to bans on "assisted suicide": the view from without and within.
    Sedler RA
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1994; 21(3):777-97. PubMed ID: 11863027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Abortion foes get turn to ask Supreme Court for constitutional protection.
    Denniston L
    Sun; 1994 Apr; ():10A. PubMed ID: 12287661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rethinking per se exclusions of hypnotically elicited recall as legal testimony.
    Perry C; Orne MT; London RW; Orne EC
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1996 Jan; 44(1):66-81. PubMed ID: 8582779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Constitutional law--United States Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of the Hyde Amendment...--Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980).
    Barnett BA
    Temple Law Q; 1981; 54(1):109-44. PubMed ID: 11655628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Constitutional law--a new Constitutional right to an abortion.
    Watt RL
    North Carol Law Rev; 1973 Oct; 51(6):1573-84. PubMed ID: 11663419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. No constitutional right to physician-assisted suicide.
    Kamisar Y
    Health Law News; 1997 Sep; 11(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 11660560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Polygraphy revisited: U.S. v. Scheffer.
    Goldzband MG
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(1):133-42. PubMed ID: 10212033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use in court of hypnotically enhanced testimony.
    Worthington TS
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1979 Oct; 27(4):402-16. PubMed ID: 521193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Will there be a constitutional right to abortion after the reconsideration of Roe v. Wade?
    Bopp J
    J Contemp Law; 1989; 15(2):131-73. PubMed ID: 11655991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Constitutional law--U.S. Supreme Court abortion decision clarifies concept of fetal viability and scope of physician's discretion in determining when viability is reached.
    Slandell H
    Temple Law Q; 1979; 52(4):1240-59. PubMed ID: 11664078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spontaneous hypnosis in the forensic context.
    Beahrs JO
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1989; 17(2):171-81. PubMed ID: 2667657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. "A new Constitutional right": the Supreme Court and abortion.
    De Borst J
    Reform J; 1973 Apr; 23(4):7-10. PubMed ID: 11663641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.