182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10212341)
1. Validation of pulse dynamic blood pressure measurement by auscultation.
Brinton TJ; Walls ED; Chio SS
Blood Press Monit; 1998 Apr; 3(2):121-124. PubMed ID: 10212341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Age-based differences between mercury sphygmomanometer and pulse dynamic blood pressure measurements.
Brinton TJ; Walls ED; Yajnik AK; Chio SS
Blood Press Monit; 1998 Apr; 3(2):125-129. PubMed ID: 10212342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of the shapes of the oscillometric pulse amplitude envelopes and their characteristic ratios on the differences between auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure measurements.
Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 17890968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the Profilomat II ambulatory blood pressure system according to the protocols of the British Hypertension Society and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation.
Mee F; Atkins N; O'Brien E
Blood Press Monit; 1998; 3(6):353-61. PubMed ID: 10212377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison between the oscillometric and the auscultatory method for ambulatory 24 h blood pressure monitoring.
Wiinberg N; Raymond IE; Bang LE; Malmqvist BB; Svendsen TL; Petersen LJ
Blood Press Monit; 1996 Jun; 1(3):187-191. PubMed ID: 10226224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of the Microlife WatchBP Home device for self home blood pressure measurement according to the International Protocol.
Stergiou GS; Giovas PP; Gkinos CP; Patouras JD
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 17496469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of an automated arterial tonometry monitor using Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation standards.
Zorn EA; Wilson MB; Angel JJ; Zanella J; Alpert BS
Blood Press Monit; 1997 Aug; 2(4):185-188. PubMed ID: 10234114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of the Microlife BPA100 Plus device for self-home blood pressure measurement according to the International Protocol.
Stergiou GS; Giovas PP; Neofytou MS; Adamopoulos DN
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Jun; 11(3):157-60. PubMed ID: 16702824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the Datascope Accutorr Plus according to the recommendations of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation.
Anwar YA; Tendler BE; McCabe EJ; Mansoor GA; White WB
Blood Press Monit; 1997 Apr; 2(2):105-110. PubMed ID: 10234101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the efficacy of the Omron HEM-737 IntelliSense device for use on adults according to the recommendations of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation.
Anwar YA; Giacco S; McCabe EJ; Tendler BE; White WB
Blood Press Monit; 1998 Aug; 3(4):261-265. PubMed ID: 10212364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of an accurate oscillometric blood pressure device for low resource settings.
de Greeff A; Nathan H; Stafford N; Liu B; Shennan AH
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Dec; 13(6):342-8. PubMed ID: 19020425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of three devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the revised British Hypertension Society Protocol: the Omron HEM-705CP, Philips HP5332, and Nissei DS-175.
O'Brien E; Mee F; Atkins N; Thomas M
Blood Press Monit; 1996 Feb; 1(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 10226203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of the A&D TM-2430 device for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and evaluation of performance according to subjects' characteristics.
Palatini P; Frigo G; Bertolo O; Roman E; Da Cortà R ; Winnicki M
Blood Press Monit; 1998 Aug; 3(4):255-260. PubMed ID: 10212363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy assessment of the Tensoval duo control according to the British and European Hypertension Societies' standards.
De Greeff A; Arora J; Hervey S; Liu B; Shennan AH
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Apr; 13(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 18347446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical evaluation of the QuietTrak blood pressure recorder according to the protocol of the British Hypertension Society.
Modesti PA; Costoli A; Cecioni I; Toccafondi S; Carnemolla A; Serneri GG
Blood Press Monit; 1996 Feb; 1(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 10226204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Ambulatory 24-hour blood pressure monitoring. A comparative study of oscillometric and auscultatory blood pressure measurement].
Raymond IE; Malmqvist BB; Wiinberg N; Bang LE; Petersen LJ; Svendsen TL
Ugeskr Laeger; 1997 Sep; 159(37):5519-24. PubMed ID: 9312921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of the HoMedics BPA-300, a home blood pressure monitor using the auscultatory method.
Yarows SA
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):339-43. PubMed ID: 17890974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of the Colson MAM BP 3AA1-2 automatic blood pressure monitor according to the European Society of Hypertension validation protocol.
Pereira T; Maldonado J
Rev Port Cardiol; 2005 Nov; 24(11):1341-51. PubMed ID: 16463984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Self-measurement of blood pressure: validation of the Braun BP VitalScan Plus 1650 monitor according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol.
Nolly H; Osso P; Nolly A; Silva M; Nolly M; Romero M
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Apr; 13(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 18347444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
