258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10212342)
21. Evaluation of the efficacy of the Omron HEM-737 IntelliSense device for use on adults according to the recommendations of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation.
Anwar YA; Giacco S; McCabe EJ; Tendler BE; White WB
Blood Press Monit; 1998 Aug; 3(4):261-265. PubMed ID: 10212364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Clinical evaluation of the QuietTrak blood pressure recorder according to the protocol of the British Hypertension Society.
Modesti PA; Costoli A; Cecioni I; Toccafondi S; Carnemolla A; Serneri GG
Blood Press Monit; 1996 Feb; 1(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 10226204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Clinical validation of an automatic device measuring blood pressure in the fingers.
Arosio E; Zannoni M
Panminerva Med; 1999 Jun; 41(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 10479914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of the Profilomat II ambulatory blood pressure system according to the protocols of the British Hypertension Society and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation.
Mee F; Atkins N; O'Brien E
Blood Press Monit; 1998; 3(6):353-61. PubMed ID: 10212377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Performance of the Colson MAM BP 3AA1-2 automatic blood pressure monitor according to the European Society of Hypertension validation protocol.
Pereira T; Maldonado J
Rev Port Cardiol; 2005 Nov; 24(11):1341-51. PubMed ID: 16463984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Cardiovascular risk stratification. Systolic, diastolic or pulse pressure?].
Pede S; Lombardo M
Ital Heart J Suppl; 2001 Apr; 2(4):356-8. PubMed ID: 19397006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Validation of the Omron 637IT wrist blood pressure measuring device with a position sensor according to the International Protocol in the elderly.
Altunkan S; Altunkan E
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 16534412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Validation of two automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension: the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) and the Omron R7 (HEM 637-IT).
Topouchian JA; El Assaad MA; Orobinskaia LV; El Feghali RN; Asmar RG
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Jun; 11(3):165-71. PubMed ID: 16702826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison between continuous ambulatory arterial blood pressure monitoring and standard blood pressure measurements among patients of younger and older age group.
Babić BK; Bagatin J; Kokić S; Ostojić SB; Carević V; Berović N
Coll Antropol; 2009 Mar; 33(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 19408605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of noninvasive oscillometric and intra-arterial blood pressure measurements in hyperacute stroke.
Manios E; Vemmos K; Tsivgoulis G; Barlas G; Koroboki E; Spengos K; Zakopoulos N
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):149-56. PubMed ID: 17496464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Indirect blood pressure measurement in cats with diabetes mellitus, chronic nephropathy and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy].
Sander C; Hörauf A; Reusch C
Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere; 1998 Apr; 26(2):110-8. PubMed ID: 9587982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [The evaluation of a noninvasive monitor to record ambulatory arterial pressure: the DIASYS 200 Novacor].
Mora-Maciá J; Ocón Pujadas JM; Doñate Cubells T; del Río Pérez G
Med Clin (Barc); 1993 Oct; 101(12):450-4. PubMed ID: 8231367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Lack of comparability of two automated blood pressure monitors in a hypertensive population.
Linden W; Wright JM
Clin Invest Med; 1986; 9(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 2873912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Trial of validation of two devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol: the Citizen CH-432B and the Citizen CH-656C.
Cotte UV; Faltenbacher VH; von Willich W; Bogner JR
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Feb; 13(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 18199925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Ambulatory 24-hour blood pressure monitoring. A comparative study of oscillometric and auscultatory blood pressure measurement].
Raymond IE; Malmqvist BB; Wiinberg N; Bang LE; Petersen LJ; Svendsen TL
Ugeskr Laeger; 1997 Sep; 159(37):5519-24. PubMed ID: 9312921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Validation of the Artsana CS 410 automated blood pressure monitor in adults according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
Pini C; Natalizi A; Gerosa PF; Frigerio M; Omboni S; Parati G
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Jun; 13(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 18496297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of blood pressure instrument and cuff side on blood pressure reading in pregnant women in the lateral recumbent position.
Kinsella SM
Int J Obstet Anesth; 2006 Oct; 15(4):290-3. PubMed ID: 16945515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring by brachial artery displacement method in high-risk surgical patients.
Weiss BM; Spahn DR; Keller E; Seifert B; Pasch T
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 1995 Nov; 12(6):555-63. PubMed ID: 8665877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Validation of the Omron M7 (HEM-780-E) oscillometric blood pressure monitoring device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol.
Coleman A; Steel S; Freeman P; de Greeff A; Shennan A
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Feb; 13(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 18199924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The trained observer better predicts daytime ABPM diastolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients than does an automated (Omron) device.
Graves JW; Grossardt BR; Gullerud RE; Bailey KR; Feldstein J
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 16534405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]