These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10212535)
21. Increased bone formation around coated implants. Stadlinger B; Bierbaum S; Grimmer S; Schulz MC; Kuhlisch E; Scharnweber D; Eckelt U; Mai R J Clin Periodontol; 2009 Aug; 36(8):698-704. PubMed ID: 19531092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Porous hydroxyapatite for grafting the maxillary sinus: a comparative histomorphometric study in sheep. Haas R; Baron M; Donath K; Zechner W; Watzek G Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 12074448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Bone apposition around two different sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implant surfaces: a histomorphometric study in canine mandibles. Bornstein MM; Valderrama P; Jones AA; Wilson TG; Seibl R; Cochran DL Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 18177427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of calcitonin on bone formation around titanium implant. A histometric study in rabbits. Januário AL; Sallum EA; de Toledo S; Sallum AW; Nociti JF Braz Dent J; 2001; 12(3):158-62. PubMed ID: 11696910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Healing response of cortical and cancellous bone around titanium implants. Lee JE; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK; Han CH; Lee SJ Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):655-62. PubMed ID: 19885405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Detailed process of bone remodeling after achievement of osseointegration in a rat implantation model. Haga M; Fujii N; Nozawa-Inoue K; Nomura S; Oda K; Uoshima K; Maeda T Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2009 Jan; 292(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 18727113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Early bone response to sandblasted, dual acid-etched and H2O2/HCl treated titanium implants: an experimental study in the rabbit. He FM; Yang GL; Li YN; Wang XX; Zhao SF Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jun; 38(6):677-81. PubMed ID: 19406618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Bone density around titanium implants may be influenced by intermittent cigarette smoke inhalation: a histometric study in rats. Nociti FH; César NJ; Carvalho MD; Sallum EA Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):347-52. PubMed ID: 12074449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Peri-implant bone reaction to immediate, early, and delayed orthodontic loading in humans. Trisi P; Rebaudi A Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2005 Aug; 25(4):317-29. PubMed ID: 16089040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Numeric simulation of time-dependent remodeling of bone around loaded oral implants. Eser A; Tonuk E; Akca K; Cehreli MC Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):597-608. PubMed ID: 19885399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cyclooxygenase-2 activity is essential for the osseointegration of dental implants. Chikazu D; Tomizuka K; Ogasawara T; Saijo H; Koizumi T; Mori Y; Yonehara Y; Susami T; Takato T Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 May; 36(5):441-6. PubMed ID: 17376655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Characterization of bone around titanium implants and bioactive glass particles: an experimental study in rats. Gorustovich A; Rosenbusch M; Guglielmotti MB Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):644-50. PubMed ID: 12381064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of peri-implant bone subjected to immediate loading: an experimental study with Macaca fascicularis. Romanos GE; Toh CG; Siar CH; Swaminathan D Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 11858574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The influence of extraction on the stability of implanted titanium microscrews: a biomechanical and histomorphometric study. Zheng L; Tang T; Deng F; Zhao Z Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):267-74. PubMed ID: 19492642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The bisphosphonate pamidronate on the surface of titanium stimulates bone formation around tibial implants in rats. Kajiwara H; Yamaza T; Yoshinari M; Goto T; Iyama S; Atsuta I; Kido MA; Tanaka T Biomaterials; 2005 Feb; 26(6):581-7. PubMed ID: 15282136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The influence of micro-motion on the tissue differentiation around immediately loaded cylindrical turned titanium implants. Duyck J; Vandamme K; Geris L; Van Oosterwyck H; De Cooman M; Vandersloten J; Puers R; Naert I Arch Oral Biol; 2006 Jan; 51(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 15922992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Histomorphometric analysis of implant anchorage for 3 types of dental implants following 6 months of healing in baboon jaws. Carr AB; Gerard DA; Larsen PE Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(6):785-91. PubMed ID: 11151576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Role of mechanical loading in healing of massive bone autografts. Knothe Tate ML; Dolejs S; Miller RM; Knothe UR J Orthop Res; 2010 Dec; 28(12):1657-64. PubMed ID: 20589937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]