These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10212542)

  • 1. Area-dependent enlargement ratios of panoramic tomography on orthograde patient positioning and its significance for implant dentistry.
    Gomez-Roman G; Lukas D; Beniashvili R; Schulte W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(2):248-57. PubMed ID: 10212542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Research methods in dentistry 9. Follow-up of permucosal implants in an edentate mandible using panoramic radiography].
    Verhoeven JW; Cune MS
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2005 Mar; 112(3):86-9. PubMed ID: 15792391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cross-sectional radiography for implant site assessment.
    Kassebaum DK; Nummikoski PV; Triplett RG; Langlais RP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1990 Nov; 70(5):674-8. PubMed ID: 2234889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The evaluation of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones and the location of anatomic landmarks in panoramic radiographs of edentulous patients for implant dentistry.
    Güler AU; Sumer M; Sumer P; Biçer I
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Oct; 32(10):741-6. PubMed ID: 16159352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of dimensional accuracy of panoramic cross-sectional tomography, its ability to identify the inferior alveolar canal, and its impact on estimation of appropriate implant dimensions in the mandibular posterior region.
    Mehra A; Pai KM
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Mar; 14(1):100-11. PubMed ID: 19673959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of changes in head position on enlargement of structures during panoramic radiography.
    Pfeiffer P; Bewersdorf S; Schmage P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 22299079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiographic modalities for diagnosis and treatment planning in implant dentistry.
    Garg AK; Vicari A
    Implant Soc; 1995; 5(5):7-11. PubMed ID: 9571835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic imaging for dental implant assessment.
    Benson BW
    Tex Dent J; 1995 Feb; 112(2):37-41. PubMed ID: 8633304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effective uses of radiographs for implant placements--panographs, cephalograms, CT scans.
    Kraut RA
    Dent Implantol Update; 1993 Apr; 4(4):29-33. PubMed ID: 8298153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Study on the necessity for cross-section imaging of the posterior mandible for treatment planning of standard cases in implant dentistry.
    Frei C; Buser D; Dula K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):490-7. PubMed ID: 15248885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conventional spiral and low-dose computed mandibular tomography for dental implant planning.
    Ekestubbe A
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 138():1-82. PubMed ID: 10635103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Magnification rate of digital panoramic radiographs and its effectiveness for pre-operative assessment of dental implants.
    Kim YK; Park JY; Kim SG; Kim JS; Kim JD
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Feb; 40(2):76-83. PubMed ID: 21239569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Panoramic and tomographic dimensional determinations for maxillary osseointegrated implants. Comparison of the morphologic information potential of two and three dimensional radiographic systems.
    Bolin A; Eliasson S
    Swed Dent J; 1995; 19(1-2):65-71. PubMed ID: 7597633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effective dose and risk assessment from film tomography used for dental implant diagnostics.
    Frederiksen NL; Benson BW; Sokolowski TW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 Aug; 23(3):123-7. PubMed ID: 7835511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Presurgical tomographic assessment for dental implants. 1. A modified imaging technique.
    Poon CK; Barss TK; Murdoch-Kinch CA; Bricker SL; Miles DA; Van Dis ML
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1992; 7(2):246-50. PubMed ID: 1398842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of panoramic and conventional cross-sectional tomography for preoperative selection of implant size.
    Schropp L; Stavropoulos A; Gotfredsen E; Wenzel A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Apr; 22(4):424-9. PubMed ID: 21054555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cross-sectional study of the factors that influence radiographic magnification of implant diameter and length.
    Choi YG; Kim YK; Eckert SE; Shim CH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(4):594-6. PubMed ID: 15346758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography scanning for placement of root form dental implants.
    Reddy MS; Mayfield-Donahoo T; Vanderven FJ; Jeffcoat MK
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1994 Dec; 5(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 7640337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiographic techniques for presurgical assessment of dental implant sites.
    Kassebaum DK; Stoller NH; Goshorn BI
    Gen Dent; 1992; 40(6):502-5, 509-10. PubMed ID: 1298675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A tomographic technique for the depiction of atrophied alveolar ridges prior to endosseous implant placement.
    Weingart D; Düker J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Feb; 22(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 8508941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.