These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Influence of different types of sockets on the range of motion of the hip joint by the transfemoral amputee. Klotz R; Colobert B; Botino M; Permentiers I Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2011 Oct; 54(7):399-410. PubMed ID: 21996548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative analysis of interface pressures in transfemoral prosthetic sockets. PaternĂ² L; Truppa L; Ibrahimi M; Rosini E; Gruppioni E; Ricotti L; Menciassi A Prosthet Orthot Int; 2024 Apr; 48(2):176-183. PubMed ID: 37379468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantification of rectifications for the Northwestern University Flexible Sub-Ischial Vacuum Socket. Fatone S; Johnson WB; Tran L; Tucker K; Mowrer C; Caldwell R Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Jun; 41(3):251-257. PubMed ID: 28094689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of ischial ramal angle for transfemoral ischial containment sockets. Quigley M; Dillon MP; Fernandez RG; Erbas B; Briggs C Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Feb; 43(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 30044195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Ischial Containment and Subischial Sockets Effect on Gait Biomechanics in People With Transfemoral Amputation: A Randomized Crossover Trial. Fatone S; Stine R; Caldwell R; Angelico J; Gard SA; Oros M; Major MJ Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2022 Aug; 103(8):1515-1523. PubMed ID: 35296398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transfemoral sockets with vacuum-assisted suspension comparison of hip kinematics, socket position, contact pressure, and preference: ischial containment versus brimless. Kahle JT; Highsmith MJ J Rehabil Res Dev; 2013; 50(9):1241-52. PubMed ID: 24458964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Northwestern University Flexible Subischial Vacuum Socket for persons with transfemoral amputation: Part 2 Description and Preliminary evaluation. Fatone S; Caldwell R Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Jun; 41(3):246-250. PubMed ID: 28132589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of NU-FlexSIV Socket Performance for Military Service Members with Transfemoral Amputation. Brown SE; Russell Esposito E; Ikeda AJ; Wilken JM; Fatone S US Army Med Dep J; 2018; (2-18):38-47. PubMed ID: 30623397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Ischial Containment and Subischial Sockets on Comfort, Function, Quality of Life, and Satisfaction With Device in Persons With Unilateral Transfemoral Amputation: A Randomized Crossover Trial. Fatone S; Caldwell R; Angelico J; Stine R; Kim KY; Gard S; Oros M Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2021 Nov; 102(11):2063-2073.e2. PubMed ID: 34214499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Coronal plane socket stability during gait in persons with transfemoral amputation: Pilot study. Fatone S; Dillon M; Stine R; Tillges R J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(8):1217-28. PubMed ID: 25629691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanics and shape of the above-knee socket considered in light of the ischial containment concept. Pritham CH Prosthet Orthot Int; 1990 Apr; 14(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 2192356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Technique modifications for a suction suspension version of the Northwestern University Flexible Sub-Ischial Vacuum socket: The Northwestern University Flexible Sub-Ischial Suction socket. Caldwell R; Fatone S Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Apr; 43(2):233-239. PubMed ID: 30223715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of the skeletal medio-lateral dimension using non-invasive anthropometric measurements for the provision of ischial containment sockets: a pilot study. Dillon MP; Laux S; Fernandez RG Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Apr; 38(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 23798041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Case study: survey of patient satisfaction with prosthesis quality and design among below-knee prosthetic leg socket users. Mohd Hawari N; Jawaid M; Md Tahir P; Azmeer RA Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2017 Nov; 12(8):868-874. PubMed ID: 28068847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship between socket pressure and EMG of two muscles in trans-femoral stumps during gait. Hong JH; Mun MS Prosthet Orthot Int; 2005 Apr; 29(1):59-72. PubMed ID: 16180378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of the transfemoral prosthetic socket interface designs on skeletal motion and socket comfort: A randomized clinical trial. Kahle J; Miro RM; Ho LT; Porter M; Lura DJ; Carey SL; Lunseth P; Highsmith J; Highsmith MJ Prosthet Orthot Int; 2020 Jun; 44(3):145-154. PubMed ID: 32308126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Function of prosthesis components in lower limb amputees with bone-anchored percutaneous implants : Biomechanical aspects]. Blumentritt S Unfallchirurg; 2017 May; 120(5):385-394. PubMed ID: 28280845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stump-socket interface pressure as an aid to socket design in prostheses for trans-femoral amputees--a preliminary study. Lee VS; Solomonidis SE; Spence WD Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 1997; 211(2):167-80. PubMed ID: 9184457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of transhumeral socket designs utilizing patient assessment and in vivo skeletal and socket motion tracking: a case study. Resnik L; Patel T; Cooney SG; Crisco JJ; Fantini C Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2016; 11(5):423-32. PubMed ID: 25425411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]