95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10212596)
1. Suspension systems for prostheses.
Kapp S
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Apr; (361):55-62. PubMed ID: 10212596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison between the suction suspension system and the hypobaric Iceross Seal-In® X5 in transtibial amputees.
Brunelli S; Delussu AS; Paradisi F; Pellegrini R; Traballesi M
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2013 Dec; 37(6):436-44. PubMed ID: 23436696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Literature review of the possible advantages of silicon liner socket use in trans-tibial prostheses.
Baars EC; Geertzen JH
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2005 Apr; 29(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 16180375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Delivery of cosmetic covers to persons with transtibial and transfemoral amputations in an outpatient prosthetic practice.
Highsmith MJ; Kahle JT; Knight M; Olk-Szost A; Boyd M; Miro RM
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Jun; 40(3):343-9. PubMed ID: 25575552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transtibial prosthetic suspension: less pistoning versus easy donning and doffing.
Gholizadeh H; Abu Osman NA; Eshraghi A; Ali S; Sævarsson SK; Wan Abas WA; Pirouzi GH
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(9):1321-30. PubMed ID: 23408214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transtibial prosthesis suspension systems: systematic review of literature.
Gholizadeh H; Abu Osman NA; Eshraghi A; Ali S; Razak NA
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 Jan; 29(1):87-97. PubMed ID: 24315710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Silicone soft socket system: its effect on the rehabilitation of geriatric patients with transfemoral amputations.
Trieb K; Lang T; Stulnig T; Kickinger W
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1999 May; 80(5):522-5. PubMed ID: 10326914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vacuum-assisted socket suspension compared with pin suspension for lower extremity amputees: effect on fit, activity, and limb volume.
Klute GK; Berge JS; Biggs W; Pongnumkul S; Popovic Z; Curless B
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2011 Oct; 92(10):1570-5. PubMed ID: 21963124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative and qualitative comparison of a new prosthetic suspension system with two existing suspension systems for lower limb amputees.
Eshraghi A; Abu Osman NA; Karimi MT; Gholizadeh H; Ali S; Wan Abas WA
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Dec; 91(12):1028-38. PubMed ID: 23168378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The evidence-base for elevated vacuum in lower limb prosthetics: Literature review and professional feedback.
Gholizadeh H; Lemaire ED; Eshraghi A
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2016 Aug; 37():108-116. PubMed ID: 27423025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Satisfaction of individuals with partial-hand amputations after they were fitted with cosmetic silicone prostheses.
Atallah H; Qureshi AZ; Msechu Z
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2023 Jun; 47(3):288-292. PubMed ID: 36705663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Axial bone-socket displacement for persons with a traumatic transtibial amputation: The effect of elevated vacuum suspension at progressive body-weight loads.
Darter BJ; Sinitski K; Wilken JM
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Oct; 40(5):552-7. PubMed ID: 26423107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prosthetic rehabilitation of multiple-digit amputa tions using silicone material in sub-Saharan African country Ghana.
Aduayom-Ahego A
Pan Afr Med J; 2020; 36():357. PubMed ID: 33224423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of Dermo and Seal-In X5 prosthetic liners on pressure distributions and reported satisfaction during ramp ambulation in persons with transtibial limb loss.
Ali S; Osman NA; Razak A; Hussain S; Wan Abas WA
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2015 Feb; 51(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 24963603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Design and fabrication of a finger prosthesis based on a new method of suspension.
Arazpour M; Mardani MA; Ahmadi Bani M; Zarezadeh F; Hutchins SW
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2013 Aug; 37(4):332-5. PubMed ID: 23196374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patient satisfaction following lower-limb amputation: the role of gait deviation.
Kark L; Simmons A
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2011 Jun; 35(2):225-33. PubMed ID: 21558305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Negative pressures during swing phase in below-knee prostheses with rubber sleeve suspension.
Chino N; Pearson JR; Cockrell JL; Mikishko HA; Koepke GH
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1975 Jan; 56(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 1115589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of interface pressures with pin and suction suspension systems.
Beil TL; Street GM
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2004; 41(6A):821-8. PubMed ID: 15685470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transtibial prosthesis suspension failure during skydiving freefall: a case report.
Gordon AT; Land RM
Assist Technol; 2009; 21(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 19719060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Suspension effect and dynamic evaluation of the total surface bearing (TSB) trans-tibial prosthesis: a comparison with the patellar tendon bearing (PTB) trans-tibial prosthesis.
Narita H; Yokogushi K; Shii S; Kakizawa M; Nosaka T
Prosthet Orthot Int; 1997 Dec; 21(3):175-8. PubMed ID: 9453088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
