BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10213028)

  • 1. Strength requirements for internal and external prostheses.
    Paul JP
    J Biomech; 1999 Apr; 32(4):381-93. PubMed ID: 10213028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conus hip prosthesis.
    Wagner H; Wagner M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(4):213-21. PubMed ID: 11706545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Standardized Loads Acting in Hip Implants.
    Bergmann G; Bender A; Dymke J; Duda G; Damm P
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155612. PubMed ID: 27195789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
    Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unilateral transfemoral osseointegrated prostheses improve joint loading during walking.
    Vandenberg NW; Stoneback JW; Davis-Wilson H; Christiansen CL; Awad ME; Melton DH; Gaffney BMM
    J Biomech; 2023 Jun; 155():111658. PubMed ID: 37276681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wear simulation of total knee prostheses using load and kinematics waveforms from stair climbing.
    Abdel-Jaber S; Belvedere C; Leardini A; Affatato S
    J Biomech; 2015 Nov; 48(14):3830-6. PubMed ID: 26431754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Loads in hip disarticulation prostheses during normal daily use.
    Nietert M; Englisch N; Kreil P; Alba-Lopez G
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1998 Dec; 22(3):199-215. PubMed ID: 9881608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Knee and hip joint replacements. Longer lasting prostheses.
    Fraser J
    Aust Fam Physician; 1999 Nov; 28(11):1109-11, 1114-5. PubMed ID: 10615753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exercise recommendations after total joint replacement: a review of the current literature and proposal of scientifically based guidelines.
    Kuster MS
    Sports Med; 2002; 32(7):433-45. PubMed ID: 12015805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of muscle activity on the forces in the femur: an in vivo study.
    Lu TW; Taylor SJ; O'Connor JJ; Walker PS
    J Biomech; 1997; 30(11-12):1101-6. PubMed ID: 9456377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. e-Knee: the electronic knee prosthesis.
    Hardwick ME; Pulido PA; D'Lima DD; Colwell CW
    Orthop Nurs; 2006; 25(5):326-9. PubMed ID: 17035919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ESB Clinical Biomechanics Award 2018: Muscle atrophy-related increased joint loading after total hip arthroplasty and their postoperative change from 3 to 50 months.
    Damm P; Brackertz S; Streitparth F; Perka C; Bergmann G; Duda GN; Winkler T
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2019 May; 65():105-109. PubMed ID: 31026763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is staircase walking a risk for the fixation of hip implants?
    Bergmann G; Graichen F; Rohlmann A
    J Biomech; 1995 May; 28(5):535-53. PubMed ID: 7775490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Standardized loads acting in knee implants.
    Bergmann G; Bender A; Graichen F; Dymke J; Rohlmann A; Trepczynski A; Heller MO; Kutzner I
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e86035. PubMed ID: 24465856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. No Differences Identified in Transverse Plane Biomechanics Between Medial Pivot and Rotating Platform Total Knee Implant Designs.
    Papagiannis GI; Roumpelakis IM; Triantafyllou AI; Makris IN; Babis GC
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 Aug; 31(8):1814-20. PubMed ID: 26923498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Initial instability in total ankle replacement: a cadaveric biomechanical investigation of the STAR and agility prostheses.
    McInnes KA; Younger AS; Oxland TR
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Sep; 96(17):e147. PubMed ID: 25187591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative analysis of internal bone remodelling concepts in a novel implant for direct skeletal attachment of limb prosthesis evaluation: A finite element analysis.
    Prochor P; Sajewicz E
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2018 Mar; 232(3):289-298. PubMed ID: 29350089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prosthetic loading during kneeling of persons with transfemoral amputation.
    Magnissalis EA; Solomonidis SE; Spence WD; Paul JP; Zahedi S
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1999 Jul; 36(3):164-72. PubMed ID: 10659799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dissemination of wear particles to the liver, spleen, and abdominal lymph nodes of patients with hip or knee replacement.
    Urban RM; Jacobs JJ; Tomlinson MJ; Gavrilovic J; Black J; Peoc'h M
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Apr; 82(4):457-76. PubMed ID: 10761937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How Does Wear Rate Compare in Well-functioning Total Hip and Knee Replacements? A Postmortem Polyethylene Liner Study.
    Pourzal R; Knowlton CB; Hall DJ; Laurent MP; Urban RM; Wimmer MA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Aug; 474(8):1867-75. PubMed ID: 26891896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.