These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10213738)

  • 1. Clinical trials. Simple megatrials are not sufficient.
    Barer D
    BMJ; 1999 Apr; 318(7191):1138. PubMed ID: 10213738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Megatrials are based on a methodological mistake.
    Charlton BG
    Br J Gen Pract; 1996 Jul; 46(408):429-31. PubMed ID: 8776917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discrepancies among megatrials.
    Furukawa TA; Streiner DL; Hori S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2000 Dec; 53(12):1193-9. PubMed ID: 11146264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Life expectancy difference and life expectancy ratio: two measures of treatment effects in randomised trials with non-proportional hazards.
    Dehbi HM; Royston P; Hackshaw A
    BMJ; 2017 May; 357():j2250. PubMed ID: 28546261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Megatrials in myocardial infarction.
    Franzosi MG; Latini R; Maggioni AP; Zuanetti G; Tognoni G
    Lancet; 1995 Nov; 346(8986):1369. PubMed ID: 7475801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence-based therapeutic strategies. There is the need to bridge the gap between simplified megatrials and individual prescriptions.
    Tavazzi L
    Ital Heart J; 2001 Feb; 2(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 11256546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Advanced issues in the design and conduct of randomized clinical trials: the bigger the better?
    Warlow C
    Stat Med; 2002 Oct; 21(19):2797-805. PubMed ID: 12325095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is there evidence that megatrials are based on a methodological mistake?
    Moher M; Moher D
    Br J Gen Pract; 1996 Nov; 46(412):688. PubMed ID: 8978123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The methodological quality of megatrials.
    Fahey T
    Br J Gen Pract; 1996 Nov; 46(412):688. PubMed ID: 8978122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Equipoise, design bias and randomized controlled trials: the elusive ethics of new drugs--a comment.
    Schimetta W; Poelz G; Poelz W; Haring HP; Aichner F
    Arthritis Res Ther; 2004 Nov; 7(1):E2. PubMed ID: 15642128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Small Simple Trials: A Strategy for Orthopaedic Randomized Trials.
    Wright JG
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Jul; 100(14):e95. PubMed ID: 30020133
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comment on: "a simple and valid tool distinguished efficacy from effectiveness studies".
    Spigt MG; Kotz D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Jul; 60(7):753-5. PubMed ID: 17573995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating causal effect with randomized controlled trial.
    Shrier I
    Epidemiology; 2013 Sep; 24(5):779-81. PubMed ID: 23903885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Design and analysis of a randomized controlled trial testing the effects of clinical decision support on the management of rheumatoid arthritis.
    Fransen J; Twisk JW; Creemers MC; van Riel PL
    Arthritis Rheum; 2004 Feb; 51(1):124-7. PubMed ID: 14872465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. SYMPLICITY: not all that simple.
    Luft FC
    Kidney Int; 2014 May; 85(5):999-1001. PubMed ID: 24786869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Randomized control trials in ALS: lessons learned.
    Mitsumoto H; Gordon P; Kaufmann P; Gooch CL; Przedborski S; Rowland LP
    Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord; 2004 Sep; 5 Suppl 1():8-13. PubMed ID: 15512861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Regarding "Inherent problems with randomized clinical trials with observational/no treatment arms".
    Lederle FA
    J Vasc Surg; 2011 Feb; 53(2):561; author reply 561-2. PubMed ID: 21276506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does study design explain the relationship between conflict of interest and positive outcome in clinical trials in psychiatry?
    Wu Y; Deboeck P; Joseph M; Hwang C; Perlis CS; Perlis RH
    J Clin Psychopharmacol; 2009 Dec; 29(6):609-11. PubMed ID: 19910733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What we can learn from open-label extensions of randomized clinical trials.
    Cummings JL
    Arch Neurol; 2006 Jan; 63(1):18-9. PubMed ID: 16401732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the usefulness of outcome-adaptive randomization.
    Yuan Y; Yin G
    J Clin Oncol; 2011 May; 29(13):e390-2; author reply e393. PubMed ID: 21422433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.