203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10214054)
1. [The effectiveness of glaucomatous visual field test using a size I stimulus].
Osako M; Osako S; Hashimoto K; Okano T
Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1999 Mar; 103(3):201-7. PubMed ID: 10214054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Size threshold perimetry performs as well as conventional automated perimetry with stimulus sizes III, V, and VI for glaucomatous loss.
Wall M; Doyle CK; Eden T; Zamba KD; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jun; 54(6):3975-83. PubMed ID: 23633660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Glaucoma diagnostics.
Geimer SA
Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 91 Thesis 1():1-32. PubMed ID: 23384049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparison of high-pass resolution perimetry and differential light sensitivity perimetry in glaucoma patients].
Kono Y; Maeda M; Yamamoto T; Kitazawa Y
Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 May; 97(5):644-8. PubMed ID: 8337971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Increased detection rate of glaucomatous visual field damage with locally condensed grids: a comparison between fundus-oriented perimetry and conventional visual field examination.
Schiefer U; Flad M; Stumpp F; Malsam A; Paetzold J; Vonthein R; Denk PO; Sample PA
Arch Ophthalmol; 2003 Apr; 121(4):458-65. PubMed ID: 12695242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Peristat: a computer-based perimetry self-test for cost-effective population screening of glaucoma.
Ianchulev T; Pham P; Makarov V; Francis B; Minckler D
Curr Eye Res; 2005 Jan; 30(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 15875358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of the OKP visual field screening test with the Humphrey field analyser.
Vernon SA; Quigley HA
Eye (Lond); 1992; 6 ( Pt 5)():521-4. PubMed ID: 1286719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Oculokinetic perimetry compared with Humphrey visual field analysis in the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.
Wishart PK
Eye (Lond); 1993; 7 ( Pt 1)():113-21. PubMed ID: 8325400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Variability in patients with glaucomatous visual field damage is reduced using size V stimuli.
Wall M; Kutzko KE; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb; 38(2):426-35. PubMed ID: 9040476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma.
Sample PA; Bosworth CF; Blumenthal EZ; Girkin C; Weinreb RN
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1783-90. PubMed ID: 10845599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The usefulness of frequency doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma screening in health-check program].
Kusaba K; Kawanami M; Ban Y
Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Sep; 108(9):554-9. PubMed ID: 15506489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Total deviation probability plots for stimulus size v perimetry: a comparison with size III stimuli.
Wall M; Brito CF; Woodward KR; Doyle CK; Kardon RH; Johnson CA
Arch Ophthalmol; 2008 Apr; 126(4):473-9. PubMed ID: 18413515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry for detection of the development of visual field defects in glaucoma suspect eyes: a prospective study.
Liu S; Yu M; Weinreb RN; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 24177945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma.
Liu S; Lam S; Weinreb RN; Ye C; Cheung CY; Lai G; Lam DS; Leung CK
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Sep; 52(10):7325-31. PubMed ID: 21810975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The repeatability of mean defect with size III and size V standard automated perimetry.
Wall M; Doyle CK; Zamba KD; Artes P; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Feb; 54(2):1345-51. PubMed ID: 23341012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Usefulness of frequency-doubling technology for perimetrically normal eyes of open-angle glaucoma patients with unilateral field loss.
Fan X; Wu LL; Ma ZZ; Xiao GG; Liu F
Ophthalmology; 2010 Aug; 117(8):1530-7, 1537.e1-2. PubMed ID: 20466428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Frequency-doubling threshold perimetry in predicting glaucoma in a population-based study: The Beijing Eye Study.
Wang YX; Xu L; Zhang RX; Jonas JB
Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 Oct; 125(10):1402-6. PubMed ID: 17923550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Equating spatial summation in visual field testing reveals greater loss in optic nerve disease.
Kalloniatis M; Khuu SK
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2016 Jul; 36(4):439-52. PubMed ID: 27197562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of a test grid using Eye Movement Perimetry for screening glaucomatous visual field defects.
Kadavath Meethal NS; Mazumdar D; Asokan R; Panday M; van der Steen J; Vermeer KA; Lemij HG; George RJ; Pel JJM
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Feb; 256(2):371-379. PubMed ID: 29282563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
