These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
40 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10214843)
1. Routine ultrasound screening in low-risk pregnancies: imperatives for further study. Ecker JL; Frigoletto FD Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Apr; 93(4):607-10. PubMed ID: 10214843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Routine ultrasonography in late pregnancy is not justified!]. Bakketeig LS Ugeskr Laeger; 2001 Oct; 163(42):5813-4. PubMed ID: 11685852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Trends in prenatal ultrasound use in the United States: 1995 to 2006. Siddique J; Lauderdale DS; VanderWeele TJ; Lantos JD Med Care; 2009 Nov; 47(11):1129-35. PubMed ID: 19786915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does maternal serum screening for Down syndrome induce anxiety in younger mothers? Lai FM; Ng CC; Yeo GS Singapore Med J; 2004 Aug; 45(8):375-8. PubMed ID: 15284931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multicenter study of first-trimester screening for trisomy 21 in 75 821 pregnancies: results and estimation of the potential impact of individual risk-orientated two-stage first-trimester screening. Nicolaides KH; Spencer K; Avgidou K; Faiola S; Falcon O Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 25(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 15736186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Screening for Down syndrome using first-trimester combined screening followed by second trimester ultrasound examination in an unselected population]. Rozenberg P; Bussières L; Chevret S; Bernard JP; Malagrida L; Cuckle H; Chabry C; Durand-Zaleski I; Bidat L; Lacroix I; Moulis M; Roger M; Jacquemot MC; Bault JP; Boukobza P; Boccara P; Vialat F; Giudicelli Y; Ville Y Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Apr; 35(4):303-11. PubMed ID: 17350315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Women as moral pioneers? Experiences of first trimester antenatal screening. Williams C; Sandall J; Lewando-Hundt G; Heyman B; Spencer K; Grellier R Soc Sci Med; 2005 Nov; 61(9):1983-92. PubMed ID: 15899542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The prenatal detection of trisomy 13, 18, and 21: comparison of the advanced first trimester screening (AFS) with the first trimester screening according to Nicolaides]. Hörmansdörfer C; Schmidt P; Hillemanns P; Scharf A Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2007 Dec; 211(6):243-9. PubMed ID: 18176905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MULTISCAN--a Scandinavian multicenter second trimester obstetric ultrasound and serum screening study. Jørgensen FS; Valentin L; Salvesen KA; Jørgensen C; Jensen FR; Bang J; Eik-Nes SH; Madsen M; Marsal K; Persson PH; Philip J; Bogstad JW; Nørgaard-Pedersen B Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Jul; 78(6):501-10. PubMed ID: 10376859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [A proposed protocol for obstetrical ultrasound examination]. Novakov A; Vejnović T; Stojić S; Belopavlović Z Med Pregl; 1999; 52(9-10):351-6. PubMed ID: 10624383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The maternal perspective on prenatal ultrasound. Stephens MB; Montefalcon R; Lane DA J Fam Pract; 2000 Jul; 49(7):601-4. PubMed ID: 10923568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Screening for Down syndrome using first-trimester combined screening followed by second-trimester ultrasound examination in an unselected population. Rozenberg P; Bussières L; Chevret S; Bernard JP; Malagrida L; Cuckle H; Chabry C; Durand-Zaleski I; Bidat L; Lacroix I; Moulis M; Roger M; Jacquemot MC; Bault JP; Boukobza P; Boccara P; Vialard F; Giudicelli Y; Ville Y Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Nov; 195(5):1379-87. PubMed ID: 16723105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Ultrasound screening in pregnancy: evidence and maternity care reality]. Jahn A Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2002 Dec; 96(10):649-54. PubMed ID: 12611051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. First-trimester combined screening for Down syndrome and other fetal anomalies. O'Leary P; Breheny N; Dickinson JE; Bower C; Goldblatt J; Hewitt B; Murch A; Stock R Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 107(4):869-76. PubMed ID: 16582125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness model for first-trimester versus second-trimester ultrasound screening for Down syndrome. Kott B; Dubinsky TJ J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Jun; 1(6):415-21. PubMed ID: 17411619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Alpha-fetoprotein detection of neural tube defects and the impact of standard ultrasound. Dashe JS; Twickler DM; Santos-Ramos R; McIntire DD; Ramus RM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Dec; 195(6):1623-8. PubMed ID: 16769022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Routine fetal ultrasound: a billion dollar baby? Bieze J Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1994 Mar; 16(3):65-74. PubMed ID: 10146688 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Ultrasound--routine practice or practised routine? Magill-Cuerden J Mod Midwife; 1994 Mar; 4(3):4-5. PubMed ID: 7788361 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Risky business: applying risk/benefit analysis consistently in entertainment ultrasound. De Crespigny L; Douglas T; Wilkinson D; Savulescu J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Dec; 34(6):613-5. PubMed ID: 19953570 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]