These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10215014)

  • 1. P300 in response to the subject's own face.
    Ninomiya H; Onitsuka T; Chen CH; Sato E; Tashiro N
    Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 1998 Oct; 52(5):519-22. PubMed ID: 10215014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Event-related potentials of self-face recognition in children with pervasive developmental disorders.
    Gunji A; Inagaki M; Inoue Y; Takeshima Y; Kaga M
    Brain Dev; 2009 Feb; 31(2):139-47. PubMed ID: 18590948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cortical mechanisms of visual self-recognition.
    Sugiura M; Watanabe J; Maeda Y; Matsue Y; Fukuda H; Kawashima R
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jan; 24(1):143-9. PubMed ID: 15588605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrophysiological correlates of categorization: P300 amplitude as index of target similarity.
    Azizian A; Freitas AL; Watson TD; Squires NK
    Biol Psychol; 2006 Mar; 71(3):278-88. PubMed ID: 16043279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Allocation of attention to self-name and self-face: An ERP study.
    Tacikowski P; Nowicka A
    Biol Psychol; 2010 May; 84(2):318-24. PubMed ID: 20298741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. BOLD response to deviant face detection informed by P300 event-related potential parameters: a simultaneous ERP-fMRI study.
    Campanella S; Bourguignon M; Peigneux P; Metens T; Nouali M; Goldman S; Verbanck P; De Tiège X
    Neuroimage; 2013 May; 71():92-103. PubMed ID: 23313569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Configurational factors in the perception of faces and non-facial objects: an ERP study.
    Ishizu T; Ayabe T; Kojima S
    Int J Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 118(7):955-66. PubMed ID: 18569153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Voluntary stimulus production enhances deviance processing in the brain.
    Nittono H
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Jan; 59(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 16257077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Frontal attentional responses to food size are abnormal in obese subjects: an electroencephalographic study.
    Babiloni C; Del Percio C; Valenzano A; Marzano N; De Rosas M; Petito A; Bellomo A; Rossi G; Lecce B; Mundi C; Lizio R; Eusebi F; Cibelli G
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Aug; 120(8):1441-8. PubMed ID: 19616997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The age of the beholder: ERP evidence of an own-age bias in face memory.
    Wiese H; Schweinberger SR; Hansen K
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Oct; 46(12):2973-85. PubMed ID: 18602408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Difficulty of discrimination modulates attentional capture for deviant information.
    Sawaki R; Katayama J
    Psychophysiology; 2007 May; 44(3):374-82. PubMed ID: 17433096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Activation of preexisting and acquired face representations: the N250 event-related potential as an index of face familiarity.
    Tanaka JW; Curran T; Porterfield AL; Collins D
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Sep; 18(9):1488-97. PubMed ID: 16989550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A P300 event-related potential brain-computer interface (BCI): the effects of matrix size and inter stimulus interval on performance.
    Sellers EW; Krusienski DJ; McFarland DJ; Vaughan TM; Wolpaw JR
    Biol Psychol; 2006 Oct; 73(3):242-52. PubMed ID: 16860920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hemispheric asymmetries in image-specific and abstractive priming of famous faces: evidence from reaction times and event-related brain potentials.
    Cooper TJ; Harvey M; Lavidor M; Schweinberger SR
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Oct; 45(13):2910-21. PubMed ID: 17663008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Event-related potentials during the Continuous Visual Memory Test.
    Retzlaff PD; Morris GL
    J Clin Psychol; 1996 Jan; 52(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 8682911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Event-related brain potential in responses to social messages via human faces.
    Ogawa T; Morioka Y; Suzuki N
    Percept Mot Skills; 2006 Apr; 102(2):421-9. PubMed ID: 16826663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of stimulus deviance and novelty on the P300 and novelty P3.
    Goldstein A; Spencer KM; Donchin E
    Psychophysiology; 2002 Nov; 39(6):781-90. PubMed ID: 12462506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Self-face recognition in attended and unattended conditions: an event-related brain potential study.
    Sui J; Zhu Y; Han S
    Neuroreport; 2006 Mar; 17(4):423-7. PubMed ID: 16514370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Independent component analysis and clustering improve signal-to-noise ratio for statistical analysis of event-related potentials.
    Zeman PM; Till BC; Livingston NJ; Tanaka JW; Driessen PF
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Dec; 118(12):2591-604. PubMed ID: 17967560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. P300-based Stroop study with low probability and target Stroop oddballs: the evidence still favors the response selection hypothesis.
    Rosenfeld JP; Skogsberg KR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Jun; 60(3):240-50. PubMed ID: 16102861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.