These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10215048)

  • 1. Electromyography of the external anal sphincter: comparison between needle and surface electrodes.
    López A; Nilsson BY; Mellgren A; Zetterström J; Holmström B
    Dis Colon Rectum; 1999 Apr; 42(4):482-5. PubMed ID: 10215048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is paradoxical sphincter reaction provoked by needle electrode electromyography?
    Johansson C; Nilsson BY; Holmström B; Dolk A
    Dis Colon Rectum; 1991 Dec; 34(12):1109-12. PubMed ID: 1959460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. EMG of the external anal sphincter: needle is superior to surface electrode.
    Wiesner A; Jost WH
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2000 Jan; 43(1):116-8. PubMed ID: 10813138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simplified evaluation of the paradoxical puborectalis contraction with surface electrodes.
    Axelson HW; Edebol Eeg-Olofsson K
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2010 Jun; 53(6):928-31. PubMed ID: 20485007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Urethral sphincter electromyography with vaginal surface electrodes: a comparison with sphincter electromyography recorded via periurethral coaxial, anal sphincter needle and perianal surface electrodes.
    Lose G; Tanko A; Colstrup H; Andersen JT
    J Urol; 1985 May; 133(5):815-8. PubMed ID: 4039373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative study between intra-anal sponge and needle electrode for electromyographic evaluation of constipated patients.
    Pfeifer J; Teoh TA; Salanga VD; Agachan F; Wexner SD
    Dis Colon Rectum; 1998 Sep; 41(9):1153-7. PubMed ID: 9749500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relation between electromyography and anal manometry of the external anal sphincter.
    Sørensen M; Tetzschner T; Rasmussen OO; Christiansen J
    Gut; 1991 Sep; 32(9):1031-4. PubMed ID: 1916486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Paradoxical sphincter reaction is influenced by rectal filling volume.
    López A; Holmström B; Nilsson BY; Dolk A; Johansson C; Schultz I; Zetterström J; Mellgren A
    Dis Colon Rectum; 1998 Aug; 41(8):1017-22. PubMed ID: 9715159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The importance of the orientation of the electrode plates in recording the external anal sphincter EMG by non-invasive anal plug electrodes.
    Binnie NR; Kawimbe BM; Papachrysostomou M; Clare N; Smith AN
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 1991 Feb; 6(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 2033356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A disposable anal plug electrode for pelvic floor/anal sphincter electromyography.
    Lose G; Kristensen JK; Andersen JT
    J Urol; 1987 Feb; 137(2):249-52. PubMed ID: 3806813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surface versus needle electrodes in determination of motor conduction time to the external anal sphincter.
    Jost WH; Ecker KW; Schimrigk K
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 1994; 9(4):197-9. PubMed ID: 7876723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Paradoxical sphincter reaction and associated colorectal disorders.
    Johansson C; Nilsson BY; Mellgren A; Dolk A; Holmström B
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 1992 Jun; 7(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 1613301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the paradoxical sphincter contraction by a strain/squeeze index in constipated patients.
    Karlbom U; Eeg-Olofsson KE; Graf W; Påhlman L
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Oct; 48(10):1923-9. PubMed ID: 16086218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surface electrodes in perineal electromyography.
    O'Donnell P; Beck C; Doyle R; Eubanks C
    Urology; 1988 Oct; 32(4):375-9. PubMed ID: 3176231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new probe for measuring electromyographic activity from multiple sites in the anal canal.
    Eisman E; Tries J
    Dis Colon Rectum; 1993 Oct; 36(10):946-52. PubMed ID: 8404387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pelvic muscle electromyography of levator ani and external anal sphincter in nulliparous women and women with pelvic floor dysfunction.
    Weidner AC; Barber MD; Visco AG; Bump RC; Sanders DB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Dec; 183(6):1390-9; discussion 1399-401. PubMed ID: 11120502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The external anal sphincter and the role of surface electromyography.
    Enck P; Hinninghofen H; Merletti R; Azpiroz F
    Neurogastroenterol Motil; 2005 Jun; 17 Suppl 1():60-7. PubMed ID: 15836456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Endoluminal ultrasound is preferable to electromyography in mapping anal sphincteric defects.
    Tjandra JJ; Milsom JW; Schroeder T; Fazio VW
    Dis Colon Rectum; 1993 Jul; 36(7):689-92. PubMed ID: 8348854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Choice of electrode in electromyography of the external urethral and anal sphincters.
    King DG; Teague CT
    J Urol; 1980 Jul; 124(1):75-7. PubMed ID: 7411727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Standardization of anal sphincter EMG: technique of needle examination.
    Podnar S; Rodi Z; Lukanovic A; Trsinar B; Vodusek DB
    Muscle Nerve; 1999 Mar; 22(3):400-3. PubMed ID: 10086902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.