255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10216535)
1. A sociodemographic and economic comparison of breast reconstruction, mastectomy, and conservative surgery.
Desch CE; Penberthy LT; Hillner BE; McDonald MK; Smith TJ; Pozez AL; Retchin SM
Surgery; 1999 Apr; 125(4):441-7. PubMed ID: 10216535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Increasing use of elective mastectomy and contralateral prophylactic surgery among breast conservation candidates: a 14-year report from a comprehensive cancer center.
Dragun AE; Pan J; Riley EC; Kruse B; Wilson MR; Rai S; Jain D
Am J Clin Oncol; 2013 Aug; 36(4):375-80. PubMed ID: 22643566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cosmetic outcome and patient satisfaction after skin-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer with immediate reconstruction of the breast.
Ueda S; Tamaki Y; Yano K; Okishiro N; Yanagisawa T; Imasato M; Shimazu K; Kim SJ; Miyoshi Y; Tanji Y; Taguchi T; Noguchi S
Surgery; 2008 Mar; 143(3):414-25. PubMed ID: 18291263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Costs of treatment for elderly women with early-stage breast cancer in fee-for-service settings.
Warren JL; Brown ML; Fay MP; Schussler N; Potosky AL; Riley GF
J Clin Oncol; 2002 Jan; 20(1):307-16. PubMed ID: 11773184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Socioeconomic status, immigration/acculturation, and ethnic variations in breast conserving surgery, San Francisco Bay area.
Gomez SL; France AM; Lee MM
Ethn Dis; 2004; 14(1):134-40. PubMed ID: 15002933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outpatient mastectomy: clinical, payer, and geographic influences.
Case C; Johantgen M; Steiner C
Health Serv Res; 2001 Oct; 36(5):869-84. PubMed ID: 11666108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The economic impact of technical change in the local treatment of breast cancer.
Kurdas C
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1997; 13(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 9119618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lumpectomy or mastectomy? Is breast conserving surgery too expensive?
Norum J; Olsen JA; Wist EA
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 1997 Aug; 45(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 9285112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A national snapshot of satisfaction with breast cancer procedures.
Atisha DM; Rushing CN; Samsa GP; Locklear TD; Cox CE; Shelley Hwang E; Zenn MR; Pusic AL; Abernethy AP
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):361-9. PubMed ID: 25465378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality of life after breast carcinoma surgery: a comparison of three surgical procedures.
Nissen MJ; Swenson KK; Ritz LJ; Farrell JB; Sladek ML; Lally RM
Cancer; 2001 Apr; 91(7):1238-46. PubMed ID: 11283922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of the cosmetic and psychological outcome of breast reconstruction, breast conserving surgery and mastectomy without reconstruction.
Nicholson RM; Leinster S; Sassoon EM
Breast; 2007 Aug; 16(4):396-410. PubMed ID: 17368026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nationwide trends in mastectomy for early-stage breast cancer.
Kummerow KL; Du L; Penson DF; Shyr Y; Hooks MA
JAMA Surg; 2015 Jan; 150(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 25408966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost comparison of mastectomy versus breast-conserving therapy for early-stage breast cancer.
Barlow WE; Taplin SH; Yoshida CK; Buist DS; Seger D; Brown M
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2001 Mar; 93(6):447-55. PubMed ID: 11259470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of cosmetic outcome on quality of life after breast cancer surgery.
Kim MK; Kim T; Moon HG; Jin US; Kim K; Kim J; Lee JW; Kim J; Lee E; Yoo TK; Noh DY; Minn KW; Han W
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Mar; 41(3):426-32. PubMed ID: 25578249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Underutilization of breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy among women with stage I or II breast cancer.
Lazovich DA; White E; Thomas DB; Moe RE
JAMA; 1991 Dec; 266(24):3433-8. PubMed ID: 1688350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost analysis of breast conservation surgery compared with modified radical mastectomy with and without reconstruction.
Palit TK; Miltenburg DM; Brunicardi FC
Am J Surg; 2000 Jun; 179(6):441-5. PubMed ID: 11004327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of resource costs of immediate and delayed breast reconstruction.
Khoo A; Kroll SS; Reece GP; Miller MJ; Evans GR; Robb GL; Baldwin BJ; Wang BG; Schusterman MA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1998 Apr; 101(4):964-8; discussion 969-70. PubMed ID: 9514328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surgeons’ Recommendation is the Factor in Determining the Breast Cancer Surgery Procedures: an Experience from Rural Hospital in Thailand.
Sattaratnamai A; Samankatiwat N; Lohsiriwat V
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 May; 19(5):1189-1193. PubMed ID: 29801400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Immediate breast reconstruction with a myocutaneous latissimus dorsi flap and implant following skin-sparing salvage mastectomy after irradiation as part of breast-conserving therapy.
van Huizum MA; Hage JJ; Rutgers EJ; Hoornweg MJ
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2016 Aug; 69(8):1080-6. PubMed ID: 26975786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing costs of standard Breast-Conserving Surgery to Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery and Mastectomy with Immediate two-stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.
Witmer TJK; Kouwenberg CAE; Bargon CA; de Leeuw DM; Koiter E; Siemerink EJM; Mureau MAM; Rakhorst HA
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Aug; 75(8):2569-2576. PubMed ID: 35398000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
