These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10217014)
21. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions. Ermiş RB Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. An in vitro comparison of four surface preparation techniques for veneering a compomer to stainless steel. Salama FS; el-Mallakh BF Pediatr Dent; 1997; 19(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 9200199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Bond strengths of composite resin and compomers in primary and permanent teeth. Jumlongras D; White GE J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(3):223-9. PubMed ID: 9484131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Electrothermal bonding: shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets after two weeks. Ward GJ; Mizrahi E; Cleaton-Jones PE Br J Orthod; 1998 May; 25(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 9668995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner. Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Fluoride, hydrogen ion and HEMA release from light-cured GIC restoratives. Kawai K; Takaoka T Am J Dent; 2002 Jun; 15(3):149-52. PubMed ID: 12469750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results. Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents. Peutzfeldt A; Sahafi A; Flury S Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 21740244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Microleakage of adhesive restorative materials. Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 11572296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Restorative dentistry for pediatric teeth. State of the art 2001. Christensen GJ J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Mar; 132(3):379-81. PubMed ID: 11258095 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RM GICs) implications for use in pediatric dentistry. Vaikuntam J ASDC J Dent Child; 1997; 64(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 9189004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Surface roughness and weight loss of esthetic restorative materials related to fluoride release and uptake. Yip HK; Lam WT; Smales RJ J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(4):321-6. PubMed ID: 10551132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]