These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10217878)

  • 1. The effect of artifact rejection by signal-space projection on source localization accuracy in MEG measurements.
    Nolte G; Curio G
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 Apr; 46(4):400-8. PubMed ID: 10217878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Partial signal space projection for artefact removal in MEG measurements: a theoretical analysis.
    Nolte G; Hämäläinen MS
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):2873-87. PubMed ID: 11720352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Current dipole localization with an ideal magnetometer system.
    Lütkenhöner B
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1996 Nov; 43(11):1049-61. PubMed ID: 9214823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigating the technical feasibility of magnetoencephalography during transcranial direct current stimulation.
    Shirota Y; Fushimi M; Sekino M; Yumoto M
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2023; 17():1270605. PubMed ID: 37771350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Error bounds for EEG and MEG dipole source localization.
    Mosher JC; Spencer ME; Leahy RM; Lewis PS
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993 May; 86(5):303-21. PubMed ID: 7685264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Artifact and head movement compensation in MEG.
    Medvedovsky M; Taulu S; Bikmullina R; Paetau R
    Neurol Neurophysiol Neurosci; 2007 Oct; ():4. PubMed ID: 18066426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implanted medical devices or other strong sources of interference are not barriers to magnetoencephalographic recordings in epilepsy patients.
    Jin K; Alexopoulos AV; Mosher JC; Burgess RC
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 Jul; 124(7):1283-9. PubMed ID: 23664658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationship between dipole parameter estimation errors and measurement conditions in magnetoencephalography.
    Ogura Y; Sekihara K
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Sep; 40(9):919-24. PubMed ID: 8288283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ocular and cardiac artifact rejection for real-time analysis in MEG.
    Breuer L; Dammers J; Roberts TP; Shah NJ
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 Aug; 233():105-14. PubMed ID: 24954539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cardiac artifact subspace identification and elimination in cognitive MEG data using time-delayed decorrelation.
    Sander TH; Wübbeler G; Lueschow A; Curio G; Trahms L
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Apr; 49(4):345-54. PubMed ID: 11942726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dipole separability in a neuromagnetic source analysis.
    Lütkenhöner B
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 May; 45(5):572-81. PubMed ID: 9581055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rejection of artifact sources in magnetoencephalogram background activity using independent component analysis.
    Escudero J; Hornero R; Abásolo D; Poza J; Fernández A; López M
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():5282-5. PubMed ID: 17945889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of contact heat evoked potential stimulator (CHEPS) in magnetoencephalography for pain research.
    Gopalakrishnan R; Machado AG; Burgess RC; Mosher JC
    J Neurosci Methods; 2013 Oct; 220(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 23994044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of metallic artifact filtering on MEG signals for source localization during interictal epileptiform activity.
    Migliorelli C; Alonso JF; Romero S; Mañanas MA; Nowak R; Russi A
    J Neural Eng; 2016 Apr; 13(2):026029. PubMed ID: 26934426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combined MEG and EEG source imaging by minimization of mutual information.
    Baillet S; Garnero L; Marin G; Hugonin JP
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 May; 46(5):522-34. PubMed ID: 10230131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Signal space separation algorithm and its application on suppressing artifacts caused by vagus nerve stimulation for magnetoencephalography recordings.
    Song T; Cui L; Gaa K; Feffer L; Taulu S; Lee RR; Huang M
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Dec; 26(6):392-400. PubMed ID: 19952563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ICA-based artifact correction improves spatial localization of adaptive spatial filters in MEG.
    Fatima Z; Quraan MA; Kovacevic N; McIntosh AR
    Neuroimage; 2013 Sep; 78():284-94. PubMed ID: 23603349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial and Frequency Specific Artifact Reduction in Optically Pumped Magnetometer Recordings.
    Xiang J; Tong H; Jiang Y; Barnes-Davis ME
    J Integr Neurosci; 2022 Aug; 21(5):145. PubMed ID: 36137963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effectively combining temporal projection noise suppression methods in magnetoencephalography.
    Clarke M; Larson E; Tavabi K; Taulu S
    J Neurosci Methods; 2020 Jul; 341():108700. PubMed ID: 32416275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Signal-to-noise ratio of the MEG signal after preprocessing.
    Gonzalez-Moreno A; Aurtenetxe S; Lopez-Garcia ME; del Pozo F; Maestu F; Nevado A
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 Jan; 222():56-61. PubMed ID: 24200506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.