These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10219124)

  • 1. A comparative study of the pulp chamber preparation in maxillary canines.
    Carrascoza A; Simi Júnior J; de Freitas e Silva AH; Pesce HF
    Braz Dent J; 1998; 9(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 10219124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of cervical preflaring on apical file size determination.
    Pecora JD; Capelli A; Guerisoli DM; Spanó JC; Estrela C
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jul; 38(7):430-5. PubMed ID: 15946262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of root thickness in curved canals after flaring.
    Isom TL; Marshall JG; Baumgartner JC
    J Endod; 1995 Jul; 21(7):368-71. PubMed ID: 7499977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peripheral dentin thickness after root-end cavity preparation.
    Roy R; Chandler NP; Lin J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb; 105(2):263-6. PubMed ID: 18230396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of effects of ProTaper, HeroShaper, and Gates Glidden Burs on cervical dentin thickness and root canal volume by using multislice computed tomography.
    Mahran AH; AboEl-Fotouh MM
    J Endod; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1219-22. PubMed ID: 18793924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation to remove artificially placed dentine debris from human root canals prepared using instruments of varying taper.
    van der Sluis LW; Wu MK; Wesselink PR
    Int Endod J; 2005 Oct; 38(10):764-8. PubMed ID: 16164691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the effects of TripleGates and Gates-Glidden burs on cervical dentin thickness and root canal area by using cone beam computed tomography.
    Sousa K; Andrade-Junior CV; Silva JM; Duarte MA; De-Deus G; Silva EJ
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2015; 23(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 26018308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Residual dentin thickness in mandibular premolars prepared with hand and rotatory instruments.
    Pilo R; Corcino G; Tamse A
    J Endod; 1998 Jun; 24(6):401-4. PubMed ID: 9693582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cleanliness of dentinal tubules following gutta-percha removal with and without solvents: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Horvath SD; Altenburger MJ; Naumann M; Wolkewitz M; Schirrmeister JF
    Int Endod J; 2009 Nov; 42(11):1032-8. PubMed ID: 19825038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Residual dentin thickness in bifurcated maxillary first premolars after root canal and post space preparation with parallel-sided drills.
    Pilo R; Shapenco E; Lewinstein I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):267-73. PubMed ID: 18395536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ex vivo evaluation of the capacity of the Tri Auto ZX to locate the apical foramen during root canal retreatment.
    Alves AM; Felippe MC; Felippe WT; Rocha MJ
    Int Endod J; 2005 Oct; 38(10):718-24. PubMed ID: 16164686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy of ProTaper Universal rotary retreatment system for gutta-percha removal from root canals.
    Gu LS; Ling JQ; Wei X; Huang XY
    Int Endod J; 2008 Apr; 41(4):288-95. PubMed ID: 18081804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of the second mesiobuccal canal in mesiobuccal roots of maxillary molar teeth ex vivo.
    Yoshioka T; Kikuchi I; Fukumoto Y; Kobayashi C; Suda H
    Int Endod J; 2005 Feb; 38(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 15667634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Residual dentin thickness in mandibular premolars prepared with gates glidden and ParaPost drills.
    Pilo R; Tamse A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jun; 83(6):617-23. PubMed ID: 10842127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of different surface treatments on the push-out bond strength of fiber post to root canal dentin.
    Demiryürek EO; Külünk S; Saraç D; Yüksel G; Bulucu B
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):e74-80. PubMed ID: 19615650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Residual dentin thickness in bifurcated maxillary premolars after root canal and dowel space preparation.
    Katz A; Wasenstein-Kohn S; Tamse A; Zuckerman O
    J Endod; 2006 Mar; 32(3):202-5. PubMed ID: 16500226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cervical shaping in curved root canals: comparison of the efficiency of two endodontic instruments.
    Busquim SS; dos Santos M
    Pesqui Odontol Bras; 2002; 16(4):327-31. PubMed ID: 12612771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ultrastructural morphologic evaluation of root canal walls prepared by two rotary nickel-titanium systems: a comparative study.
    Sabet NE; Lutfy RA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Sep; 106(3):e59-66. PubMed ID: 18602300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of eugenol on resin bond strengths to root canal dentin.
    Ngoh EC; Pashley DH; Loushine RJ; Weller RN; Kimbrough WF
    J Endod; 2001 Jun; 27(6):411-4. PubMed ID: 11487137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of dowel space on the bond strengths of fiber posts.
    Perdigão J; Gomes G; Augusto V
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(3):154-64. PubMed ID: 17581176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.