129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10219132)
1. Characterization of the interface between prefabricated gold copings and cast dental alloy in implant restorations.
Carotenuto G; Palumbo M; Zarone F; Nicolais L
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1999 Apr; 10(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 10219132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characterization of noble metal implant cylinders: as-received cylinders and cast interfaces with noble metal alloys.
Carr AB; Brantley WA
J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Jan; 75(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 8850457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microstructure, elemental composition, hardness and crystal structure study of the interface between a noble implant component and cast noble alloys.
Ucar Y; Brantley WA; Johnston WM; Iijima M; Han DS; Dasgupta T
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Sep; 106(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 21889003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Titanium alloy cylinders in implant framework fabrication: a study of the cylinder-alloy interface.
Carr AB; Brantley WA
J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Apr; 69(4):391-7. PubMed ID: 8463969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characterization of the interface between cast-to Co-Cr implant cylinders and cast Co-Cr alloys.
Ozkomur A; Ucar Y; Ekren O; Arai Shinkai RS; Teixeira ER
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 May; 115(5):592-600. PubMed ID: 26794696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characterization of cast-to implant components from five manufacturers.
Ucar Y; Brantley WA; Bhattiprolu SN; Johnston WM; McGlumphy EA
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):216-23. PubMed ID: 19782823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro vertical misfit evaluation of cast frameworks for cement-retained implant-supported partial prostheses.
Oyagüe RC; Turrión AS; Toledano M; Monticelli F; Osorio R
J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 18951675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cementable implant crowns composed of cast superstructure frameworks luted to electroformed primary copings: an in vitro retention study.
Di Felice R; Rappelli G; Camaioni E; Cattani M; Meyer JM; Belser UC
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Feb; 18(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 17224031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of four dental alloys following torch/centrifugal and induction/ vacuum-pressure casting procedures.
Thompson GA; Luo Q; Hefti A
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Dec; 110(6):471-80. PubMed ID: 24120072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Vertical discrepancy and microleakage of laser-sintered and vacuum-cast implant-supported structures luted with different cement types.
Oyagüe RC; Sánchez-Turrión A; López-Lozano JF; Suárez-García MJ
J Dent; 2012 Feb; 40(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 22108101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Basic evaluation of cast joining for electroformed coping using multi-purpose alloys.
Yamaguchi Y; Takahashi H; Shiota M; Iwasaki N
Dent Mater J; 2005 Sep; 24(3):356-61. PubMed ID: 16281324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Strengthening of a Pd-free high gold dental alloy for porcelain bonding by a pre-firing heat treatment.
Liu WB; Wang JN
Dent Mater; 2007 Sep; 23(9):1136-41. PubMed ID: 17112578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of interface characterization and adhesion of glass ceramics to commercially pure titanium and gold alloy after thermal- and mechanical-loading.
Vásquez VZ; Ozcan M; Kimpara ET
Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):221-31. PubMed ID: 18718654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measurement of the dimensions and abutment rotational freedom of gold-machined 3i UCLA-type abutments in the as-received condition, after casting with a noble metal alloy and porcelain firing.
Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Nov; 84(5):548-53. PubMed ID: 11105010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of interfacial variables on ceramic adherence to cast and machined commercially pure titanium.
Sadeq A; Cai Z; Woody RD; Miller AW
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jul; 90(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 12869969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The fit of cast and premachined implant abutments.
Byrne D; Houston F; Cleary R; Claffey N
J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Aug; 80(2):184-92. PubMed ID: 9710820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An investigation of the Impac custom abutment for root form dental implants.
Mante FK; Seckinger RJ; Purinton D; Abreu SJ; Berthold P
J Prosthodont; 1994 Mar; 3(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 8061786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mechanical properties, fracture surface characterization, and microstructural analysis of six noble dental casting alloys.
Ucar Y; Brantley WA; Johnston WM; Dasgupta T
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jun; 105(6):394-402. PubMed ID: 21640241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of two opaquing techniques and two metal surface conditions on metal-ceramic bond strength.
Rake PC; Goodacre CJ; Moore BK; Munoz CA
J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Jul; 74(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 7674194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microstructure, hardness, corrosion resistance and porcelain shear bond strength comparison between cast and hot pressed CoCrMo alloy for metal-ceramic dental restorations.
Henriques B; Soares D; Silva FS
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Aug; 12():83-92. PubMed ID: 22659369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
