These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10219580)

  • 1. Comparison of a transcription-mediated amplification assay and polymerase chain reaction for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine.
    Pasternack R; Vuorinen P; Miettinen A
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1999 Feb; 18(2):142-4. PubMed ID: 10219580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the Gen-Probe Chlamydia trachomatis transcription-mediated amplification assay with urine specimens from women.
    Pasternack R; Vuorinen P; Miettinen A
    J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Mar; 35(3):676-8. PubMed ID: 9041411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of three commercially available amplification assays, AMP CT, LCx, and COBAS AMPLICOR, for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine.
    Goessens WH; Mouton JW; van der Meijden WI; Deelen S; van Rijsoort-Vos TH; Lemmens-den Toom N; Verbrugh HA; Verkooyen RP
    J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Oct; 35(10):2628-33. PubMed ID: 9316920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Urine specimens from pregnant and nonpregnant women inhibitory to amplification of Chlamydia trachomatis nucleic acid by PCR, ligase chain reaction, and transcription-mediated amplification: identification of urinary substances associated with inhibition and removal of inhibitory activity.
    Mahony J; Chong S; Jang D; Luinstra K; Faught M; Dalby D; Sellors J; Chernesky M
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Nov; 36(11):3122-6. PubMed ID: 9774550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of performances of two commercially available tests, a PCR assay and a ligase chain reaction test, in detection of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
    Puolakkainen M; Hiltunen-Back E; Reunala T; Suhonen S; Lähteenmäki P; Lehtinen M; Paavonen J
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Jun; 36(6):1489-93. PubMed ID: 9620366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison between the LCx Probe system and the COBAS AMPLICOR system for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections in patients attending a clinic for treatment of sexually transmitted diseases in Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
    van Doornum GJ; Schouls LM; Pijl A; Cairo I; Buimer M; Bruisten S
    J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Mar; 39(3):829-35. PubMed ID: 11230391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability of nucleic acid amplification methods for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine: results of the first international collaborative quality control study among 96 laboratories.
    Verkooyen RP; Noordhoek GT; Klapper PE; Reid J; Schirm J; Cleator GM; Ieven M; Hoddevik G
    J Clin Microbiol; 2003 Jul; 41(7):3013-6. PubMed ID: 12843035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multicenter evaluation of the fully automated COBAS AMPLICOR PCR test for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital specimens.
    Vincelette J; Schirm J; Bogard M; Bourgault AM; Luijt DS; Bianchi A; van Voorst Vader PC; Butcher A; Rosenstraus M
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Jan; 37(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 9854067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of the Gen-Probe AMPLIFIED Chlamydia Trachomatis Assay in detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical and urine specimens from women and urethral and urine specimens from men attending sexually transmitted disease and family planning clinics.
    Ferrero DV; Meyers HN; Schultz DE; Willis SA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Nov; 36(11):3230-3. PubMed ID: 9774570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of manual Amplicor PCR, Cobas Amplicor PCR, and LCx assays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women by using urine specimens.
    Pasternack R; Vuorinen P; Pitkäjärvi T; Koskela M; Miettinen A
    J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Feb; 35(2):402-5. PubMed ID: 9003605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Gen-probe transcription-mediated amplification, Abbott PCR, and Roche PCR assays for detection of wild-type and mutant plasmid strains of Chlamydia trachomatis in Sweden.
    Møller JK; Pedersen LN; Persson K
    J Clin Microbiol; 2008 Dec; 46(12):3892-5. PubMed ID: 18842934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of DNA amplification methods for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine from asymptomatic military recruits.
    Stary A; Tomazic-Allen S; Choueiri B; Burczak J; Steyrer K; Lee H
    Sex Transm Dis; 1996; 23(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 8919734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by DNA amplification methods in urine samples from men with urethritis.
    Templeton K; Roberts J; Jeffries D; Forster G; Aitken C
    Int J STD AIDS; 2001 Dec; 12(12):793-6. PubMed ID: 11779369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by the Gen-Probe AMPLIFIED Chlamydia Trachomatis Assay (AMP CT) in urine specimens from men and women and endocervical specimens from women.
    Crotchfelt KA; Pare B; Gaydos C; Quinn TC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Feb; 36(2):391-4. PubMed ID: 9466747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Direct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic men by using a rapid polymerase chain reaction assay.
    Jaschek G; Gaydos CA; Welsh LE; Quinn TC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1993 May; 31(5):1209-12. PubMed ID: 8501220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multicenter evaluation of the AMPLICOR and automated COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG tests for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Van Der Pol B; Quinn TC; Gaydos CA; Crotchfelt K; Schachter J; Moncada J; Jungkind D; Martin DH; Turner B; Peyton C; Jones RB
    J Clin Microbiol; 2000 Mar; 38(3):1105-12. PubMed ID: 10699004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Urinary inhibitors of polymerase chain reaction and ligase chain reaction and testing of multiple specimens may contribute to lower assay sensitivities for diagnosing Chlamydia trachomatis infected women.
    Chernesky MA; Jang D; Sellors J; Luinstra K; Chong S; Castriciano S; Mahony JB
    Mol Cell Probes; 1997 Aug; 11(4):243-9. PubMed ID: 9281409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in symptomatic and asymptomatic populations with urogenital specimens by AMP CT (Gen-probe incorporated) compared to others commercially available amplification assays.
    de Barbeyrac B; Géniaux M; Hocké C; Dupon M; Bébéar C
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2000 Jul; 37(3):181-5. PubMed ID: 10904191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The verification of nucleic acid amplification testing (Gen-Probe Aptima Assay) for chlamydia trachomatis from ocular samples.
    Kowalski RP; Karenchak LM; Raju LV; Ismail N
    Ophthalmology; 2015 Feb; 122(2):244-7. PubMed ID: 25439605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. External quality assessment program for Chlamydia trachomatis diagnostic testing by nucleic acid amplification assays.
    Land S; Tabrizi S; Gust A; Johnson E; Garland S; Dax EM
    J Clin Microbiol; 2002 Aug; 40(8):2893-6. PubMed ID: 12149347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.