148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10219723)
1. Electrical impedance measurements with the CI24M cochlear implant for a child with Mondini dysplasia.
French ML
Br J Audiol; 1999 Feb; 33(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 10219723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [The intraoperative application of neural response telemetry with the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant].
Yang H; Tang J; Cao K; Zhu X; Wang Y; Pan T
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Oct; 36(5):352-6. PubMed ID: 12761943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intra- and postoperative electrode impedance of the straight and Contour arrays of the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant: relation to T and C levels.
van Wermeskerken GK; van Olphen AF; Smoorenburg GF
Int J Audiol; 2006 Sep; 45(9):537-44. PubMed ID: 17005497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Electrode interaction in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of straight and contour electrode arrays.
Xi X; Ji F; Han D; Hong M; Chen A
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2009; 71(4):228-37. PubMed ID: 19707042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differences in the impedance of cochlear implant devices within 24 hours of their implantation.
Lin DP; Chen JK; Tung TH; Li LP
PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0222711. PubMed ID: 31536550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Speech development in young children with Mondini dysplasia who had undergone cochlear implantation.
Qi S; Kong Y; Xu T; Dong R; Lv J; Wang X; Qi B; Wang S; Yan F; Li Y; Huang L; Chen X
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Jan; 116():118-124. PubMed ID: 30554681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Another reason for intra-operative imaging during cochlear implantation.
Viccaro M; De Seta E; Covelli E; Marvaso V; Filipo R
J Laryngol Otol; 2008 Apr; 122(4):e12. PubMed ID: 18331660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of age, electrode array, and time on cochlear implant impedances.
Velandia S; Martinez D; Goncalves S; Pena S; Bas E; Ein L; Prentiss S; Telischi F; Angeli S; Dinh CT
Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Nov; 21(6):344-352. PubMed ID: 32640889
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. How well do cochlear implant intraoperative impedance measures predict postoperative electrode function?
Goehring JL; Hughes ML; Baudhuin JL; Lusk RP
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Feb; 34(2):239-44. PubMed ID: 23295726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The importance of intra-operative imaging during cochlear implant surgery.
Viccaro M; Covelli E; De Seta E; Balsamo G; Filipo R
Cochlear Implants Int; 2009 Dec; 10(4):198-202. PubMed ID: 19197917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of modiolar proximity through bipolar impedance measurements.
Pile J; Sweeney AD; Kumar S; Simaan N; Wanna GB
Laryngoscope; 2017 Jun; 127(6):1413-1419. PubMed ID: 27557458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cochlear implantees: Analysis of behavioral and objective measures for a clinical population of various age groups.
Greisiger R; Shallop JK; Hol PK; Elle OJ; Jablonski GE
Cochlear Implants Int; 2015; 16 Suppl 4():1-19. PubMed ID: 26642899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Study of electrode impedance and NRT value characteristics with cochlear implants in children with malformed inner ear and normal inner ear].
Qiao X; Wang D
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Nov; 27(22):1231-3. PubMed ID: 24616978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Impedance of cochlear implant electrode array in scalae tympani].
Du Q; Wang ZM
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Dec; 88(46):3302-4. PubMed ID: 19159560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predicting Cochlear Implant Electrode Placement Using Monopolar, Three-Point and Four-Point Impedance Measurements.
Sijgers L; Huber A; Tabibi S; Grosse J; Roosli C; Boyle P; Koka K; Dillier N; Pfiffner F; Dalbert A
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2022 Aug; 69(8):2533-2544. PubMed ID: 35143392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of electrode impedance and its subcomponents for lateral wall, mid-scala, and perimodiolar electrodes in cochlear implants.
Saoji AA; Graham M; Stein A; Koka K
Cochlear Implants Int; 2022 Mar; 23(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 34895078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electrode migration after cochlear implant surgery: more common than expected?
Dietz A; Wennström M; Lehtimäki A; Löppönen H; Valtonen H
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Jun; 273(6):1411-8. PubMed ID: 26164294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Increase in cochlear implant electrode impedances with the use of electrical stimulation.
Saoji AA; Adkins WJ; Olund AP; Graham M; Patel NS; Neff BA; Carlson ML; Driscoll CLW
Int J Audiol; 2020 Nov; 59(11):881-888. PubMed ID: 32749178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Variations in electrode impedance during and after cochlear implantation: Round window versus extended round window insertions.
Wang J; Sun J; Sun J; Chen J
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Nov; 102():44-48. PubMed ID: 29106874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cochlear implantation in children with meningitis related deafness: The influence of electrode impedance and implant charge on auditory performance - A case control study.
Helmstaedter V; Buechner A; Stolle S; Goetz F; Lenarz T; Durisin M
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Oct; 113():102-109. PubMed ID: 30173965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
