BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10220093)

  • 1. Total knee arthroplasty with a mobile-bearing prosthesis: comparison of retention and sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament in cementless implants.
    Stiehl JB; Voorhorst PE
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 1999 Apr; 28(4):223-8. PubMed ID: 10220093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. LCS mobile-bearing total knee replacement. A 10-year's follow-up study.
    Vogt JC; Saarbach C
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 May; 95(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 19328763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vivo kinematic comparison of posterior cruciate ligament retention or sacrifice with a mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty.
    Stiehl JB; Dennis DA; Komistek RD; Keblish PA
    Am J Knee Surg; 2000; 13(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 11826919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modification of the posterior cruciate ligament tension following total knee arthroplasty: comparison of the Genesis CR and LCS meniscal bearing prostheses.
    Siebel T; Käfer W
    Knee; 2004 Jun; 11(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 15194096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term survivorship analysis of cruciate-sparing versus cruciate-sacrificing knee prostheses using meniscal bearings.
    Buechel FF; Pappas MJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 Nov; (260):162-9. PubMed ID: 2225619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New Jersey low contact stress knee replacement system. Ten-year evaluation of meniscal bearings.
    Buechel FF; Pappas MJ
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1989 Apr; 20(2):147-77. PubMed ID: 2922189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [In vitro investigation of posterior cruciate ligament strain following total knee arthroplasty].
    Siebel T; Käfer W
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2006; 144(2):164-71. PubMed ID: 16625446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Medin modular implant for total knee arthroplasty--mid-term results].
    Vavrík P; Landor I; Tomaides J; Popelka S
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Feb; 76(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 19268046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of range of motion after posterior cruciate ligament retention or sacrifice with a mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty.
    Stiehl JB; Voorhorst PE; Keblish P; Sorrells RB
    Am J Knee Surg; 1997; 10(4):216-20. PubMed ID: 9421597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.
    Carothers JT; Kim RH; Dennis DA; Southworth C
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Jun; 26(4):537-42. PubMed ID: 20634039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Twenty-year evaluation of the New Jersey LCS Rotating Platform Knee Replacement.
    Buechel FF; Buechel FF; Pappas MJ; Dalessio J
    J Knee Surg; 2002; 15(2):84-9. PubMed ID: 12013078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tibiofemoral force following total knee arthroplasty: comparison of four prosthesis designs in vitro.
    Nicholls RL; Schirm AC; Jeffcote BO; Kuster MS
    J Orthop Res; 2007 Nov; 25(11):1506-12. PubMed ID: 17568418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term results of low contact stress mobile-bearing total knee replacements.
    Huang CH; Ma HM; Lee YM; Ho FY
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Nov; (416):265-70. PubMed ID: 14646769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Short-term effect of rotating hinge knee prosthesis].
    Lei G; Gao S; Li K
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Mar; 21(3):231-4. PubMed ID: 17419198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Posterior cruciate-retaining, rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty: minimum 4-year follow-up study.
    Elwood JJ; Callaghan JJ; Liu SS; Goetz DD
    Orthopedics; 2012 Dec; 35(12):e1699-704. PubMed ID: 23218624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Total knee arthroplasty with bicruciate preservation: Comparison versus the same posterostabilized design at eight years follow-up].
    Goutallier D; Manicom O; Van Driessche S
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Oct; 94(6):585-95. PubMed ID: 18929754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Results of total knee prostheses with or without preservation of the posterior cruciate ligament].
    Vinciguerra B; Pascarel X; Honton JL
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1994; 80(7):620-5. PubMed ID: 7638388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Balancing the posterior cruciate ligament during cruciate-retaining fixed and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: description of the pull-out lift-off and slide-back tests.
    Scott RD; Chmell MJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Jun; 23(4):605-8. PubMed ID: 18514882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Primary posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of American and Japanese cohorts.
    Iorio R; Kobayashi S; Healy WL; Cruz AI; Ayers ME
    J Surg Orthop Adv; 2007; 16(4):164-70. PubMed ID: 18053397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Fixed-bearing versus mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized clinical and radiological study].
    Lädermann A; Saudan M; Riand N; Fritschy D
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 May; 94(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 18456059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.