These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10220222)

  • 1. Clinical evaluation of a new, above-elbow, body-powered prosthetic arm: a final report.
    Cupo ME; Sheredos SJ
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1998 Oct; 35(4):431-46. PubMed ID: 10220222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of the Modular Electromechanical Lock Actuator (MELA) for above-elbow prostheses: a final report.
    Cupo ME; Sheredos SJ
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1996 Feb; 33(1):56-67. PubMed ID: 8868418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. User and clinician perspectives on DEKA arm: results of VA study to optimize DEKA arm.
    Resnik L; Klinger SL; Etter K
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 24805891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical application study of externally powered upper-limb prosthetics systems: the VA elbow, the VA hand, and the VA/NU myoelectric hand systems.
    Lewis EA; Sheredos CR; Sowell TT; Houston VL
    Bull Prosthet Res; 1975; (10-24):51-136. PubMed ID: 776301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. User ratings of prosthetic usability and satisfaction in VA study to optimize DEKA arm.
    Resnik L; Borgia M
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 24805890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Report on the Evaluation of the VA/SEATTLE Ankle. The Rehabilitation R&D Evaluation Unit, Rehabilitation Research and Development Service, Department of Veterans Affairs.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1991; 28(2):79-90. PubMed ID: 2066870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Report on the evaluation of the VA/Seattle below-knee prosthesis.
    Ellepola W; Sheredos SJ
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(2):260-6. PubMed ID: 8035354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do users want to receive a DEKA Arm and why? Overall findings from the Veterans Affairs Study to optimize the DEKA Arm.
    Resnik L; Latlief G; Klinger SL; Sasson N; Walters LS
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Dec; 38(6):456-66. PubMed ID: 24286806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Replantation versus Prosthetic Fitting in Traumatic Arm Amputations: A Systematic Review.
    Otto IA; Kon M; Schuurman AH; van Minnen LP
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0137729. PubMed ID: 26340003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Issues of importance reported by persons with lower limb amputations and prostheses.
    Legro MW; Reiber G; del Aguila M; Ajax MJ; Boone DA; Larsen JA; Smith DG; Sangeorzan B
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1999 Jul; 36(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 10659798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Self-reported and performance-based outcomes using DEKA Arm.
    Resnik L; Borgia M; Latlief G; Sasson N; Smurr-Walters L
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(3):351-62. PubMed ID: 25019659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prosthetic rehabilitation in bilateral high above elbow amputation.
    Johansen PB; Breitholtz M; Cavrini R; Johansson B; Schmidl H; Thyberg M
    Scand J Rehabil Med; 1987; 19(2):85-7. PubMed ID: 3616527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Design and development of a novel 3D-printed non-metallic self-locking prosthetic arm for a forequarter amputation.
    Binedell T; Meng E; Subburaj K
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2021 Feb; 45(1):94-99. PubMed ID: 33834751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Design and evaluation of voluntary opening and voluntary closing prosthetic terminal device.
    Sensinger JW; Lipsey J; Thomas A; Turner K
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2015; 52(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 26186081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attrition and retention in upper limb prosthetics research: experience of the VA home study of the DEKA arm.
    Resnik L; Klinger S
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2017 Nov; 12(8):816-821. PubMed ID: 28098513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lightweight prostheses for bilateral below-elbow amputees.
    Rout SN
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1993 Aug; 17(2):126-9. PubMed ID: 8233769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prosthetic use in adult upper limb amputees: a comparison of the body powered and electrically powered prostheses.
    Millstein SG; Heger H; Hunter GA
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1986 Apr; 10(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 3725563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interim report on VA clinical evaluation of externally powered upper-limb prostheses (June 1971-June 1972).
    Ross CA
    Bull Prosthet Res; 1973; 10(19):104-23. PubMed ID: 4588223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictors of retention and attrition in a study of an advanced upper limb prosthesis: implications for adoption of the DEKA Arm.
    Resnik L; Cancio J; Klinger S; Latlief G; Sasson N; Smurr-Walters L
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2018 Feb; 13(2):206-210. PubMed ID: 28375687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of the University of New Brunswick Test of Prosthetic Function and the Assessment of Capacity for Myoelectric Control.
    Burger H; Brezovar D; Vidmar G
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2014 Aug; 50(4):433-8. PubMed ID: 24476807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.