These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10220660)

  • 1. Correlation between planned prosthetic and residual bone trajectories in dental implants.
    Almog DM; Sanchez R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):562-7. PubMed ID: 10220660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison between planned prosthetic trajectory and residual bone trajectory using surgical guides and tomography--a pilot study.
    Almog DM; Onufrak JM; Hebel K; Meitner SW
    J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(4):275-80. PubMed ID: 8699519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Distribution of bone quality in patients receiving endosseous dental implants.
    Truhlar RS; Orenstein IH; Morris HF; Ochi S
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1997 Dec; 55(12 Suppl 5):38-45. PubMed ID: 9393425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. One-step surgical placement of Brånemark implants: a prospective multicenter clinical study.
    Becker W; Becker BE; Israelson H; Lucchini JP; Handelsman M; Ammons W; Rosenberg E; Rose L; Tucker LM; Lekholm U
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):454-62. PubMed ID: 9274074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The incisive canal. Considerations during implant placement: case report and literature review.
    Romanos GE; Greenstein G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):740-5. PubMed ID: 19885417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simultaneous Le Fort I osteotomy and computer-guided implant placement.
    Benech A; Mazzanti C; Arcuri F; Giarda M; Brucoli M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 May; 22(3):1042-6. PubMed ID: 21558889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Complete arch site classification for all-on-4 immediate function.
    Jensen OT
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):741-51.e2. PubMed ID: 24831746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-dimensional CT scan analysis for implant-supported fixed prostheses.
    Gogarnoiu D; Cavanaugh RR
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1999 Sep; 20(9):855-60, 862, 864 passim; quiz 868. PubMed ID: 10649955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relationships between bone density values from cone beam computed tomography, maximum insertion torque, and resonance frequency analysis at implant placement: a pilot study.
    Fuster-Torres MÁ; Peñarrocha-Diago M; Peñarrocha-Oltra D; Peñarrocha-Diago M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1051-6. PubMed ID: 22010089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The evaluation of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones and the location of anatomic landmarks in panoramic radiographs of edentulous patients for implant dentistry.
    Güler AU; Sumer M; Sumer P; Biçer I
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Oct; 32(10):741-6. PubMed ID: 16159352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Study on the necessity for cross-section imaging of the posterior mandible for treatment planning of standard cases in implant dentistry.
    Frei C; Buser D; Dula K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):490-7. PubMed ID: 15248885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of clinical and radiological classification of the jawbone anatomy for implantation--a survey of 374 patients.
    Juodzbalys G; Raustia AM
    J Oral Implantol; 2004; 30(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 15008452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation between bone density and angular deviation of implants placed using CT-generated surgical guides.
    Ozan O; Orhan K; Turkyilmaz I
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Sep; 22(5):1755-61. PubMed ID: 21959426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rehabilitation of the maxillary arch with implant-supported fixed restorations guided by the most apical buccal bone level in the esthetic zone: a clinical report.
    Rojas-Vizcaya F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Apr; 107(4):213-20. PubMed ID: 22475463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of CBCT imaging when placing dental implants in the anterior edentulous mandible: a before-after study.
    Shelley AM; Ferrero A; Brunton P; Goodwin M; Horner K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(4):20140316. PubMed ID: 25472617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reconstruction of the moderately atrophic edentulous maxilla with mandibular bone grafts.
    Cordaro L; Boghi F; Mirisola di Torresanto V; Torsello F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1214-21. PubMed ID: 22788219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prosthetically driven, computer-guided implant planning for the edentulous maxilla: a model study.
    Katsoulis J; Pazera P; Mericske-Stern R
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):238-45. PubMed ID: 18783423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Histomorphometric analysis of implant anchorage for 3 types of dental implants following 6 months of healing in baboon jaws.
    Carr AB; Gerard DA; Larsen PE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(6):785-91. PubMed ID: 11151576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical application of spiral tomography in anterior implant placement: case report.
    Dixon DR; Morgan R; Hollender LG; Roberts FA; O'Neal RB
    J Periodontol; 2002 Oct; 73(10):1202-9. PubMed ID: 12416780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of two-dimensional orthoradially reformatted computed tomography and panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning.
    Lam EW; Ruprecht A; Yang J
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Jul; 74(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 7674189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.