These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. The multiple faces of journal peer review. Thatje S Naturwissenschaften; 2010 Mar; 97(3):237-9. PubMed ID: 20127306 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals. Smith R J R Soc Med; 2006 Apr; 99(4):178-82. PubMed ID: 16574968 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The peer review process: a primer for Hirsch JA; Manchikanti L; Albuquerque FC; Leslie-Mazwi TM; Lev MH; Linfante I; Mocco J; Rai AT; Schaefer PW; Tarr RW J Neurointerv Surg; 2017 Jul; 9(e1):e3-e6. PubMed ID: 25888447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. At its best, peer review is wonderful to behold. Samimi M; Anstey A Br J Dermatol; 2017 Dec; 177(6):1466-1467. PubMed ID: 29313917 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The process of a peer-reviewed journal. Pearson GS Perspect Psychiatr Care; 2013 Jul; 49(3):147-8. PubMed ID: 23819663 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Our peer-review practice and strategies to improve journal scientific performance]. Kudaiberdieva G Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2010 Oct; 10(5):389-90. PubMed ID: 20929692 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Response to Scientific journals are 'faith based': is there a science behind peer review? Schroter S J R Soc Med; 2007 Mar; 100(3):117-8. PubMed ID: 17339301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Science and scholarship: ten volumes of the Journal Hospital Medicine. Auerbach A J Hosp Med; 2015 Jan; 10(1):64-6. PubMed ID: 25470813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Universal Principled Review: A Community-Driven Method to Improve Peer Review. Krummel M; Blish C; Kuhns M; Cadwell K; Oberst A; Goldrath A; Ansel KM; Chi H; O'Connell R; Wherry EJ; Pepper M; Cell; 2019 Dec; 179(7):1441-1445. PubMed ID: 31835023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Strengthening the peer review process for the International Journal of Toxicology. Brock WJ Int J Toxicol; 2014; 33(5):351-2. PubMed ID: 25436270 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. What can and should be done to reduce publication bias? The perspective of an editor. Sharp DW JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1390-1. PubMed ID: 2304218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Enhancements in peer review of manuscripts by the Journal. Liesegang TJ Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 158(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24929824 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Editor and authors' psychology and the chance of teaching. Grammaticos PC Hell J Nucl Med; 2006; 9(3):154-5. PubMed ID: 17160154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The scientific process: new forces attempt to enter the scene. Kinne O Dis Aquat Organ; 2003 Jun; 55(1):1. PubMed ID: 12887247 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Tips for writing and publishing an article. Nahata MC Ann Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 42(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 18212252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conflict of interest. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Ann Intern Med; 1993 Apr; 118(8):646-7. PubMed ID: 8452334 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]