These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10220935)

  • 41. How does The Journal of Pathology deal with conflict of interest?
    Hall PA; Poulsom R; Wixon J
    J Pathol; 2009 Dec; 219(4):396-9. PubMed ID: 19827054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Training and experience of peer reviewers: an additional variable to consider.
    Kulstad E
    PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e143; author reply e145. PubMed ID: 17388681
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Journal peer review. The need for a research agenda.
    Bailar JC; Patterson K
    N Engl J Med; 1985 Mar; 312(10):654-7. PubMed ID: 3974641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The discourteous reviewer.
    Leviton A
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 21(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 17239173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Training and experience of peer reviewers: is being a "good reviewer" a persistent quality?
    García-Doval I
    PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e144; author reply e145. PubMed ID: 17388682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Meeting our ethical obligations in medical publishing: responsibilities of editors, authors, and readers of peer-reviewed journals.
    Albert DM; Liesegang TJ; Schachat AP
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2005 May; 123(5):684-6. PubMed ID: 15883290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Conflict of interest and respiratory care.
    Pierson DJ
    Respir Care; 2000 Apr; 45(4):388-9. PubMed ID: 10780033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Publication of RadioGraphics manuscripts: guidelines for authors and description of solicitation process and peer review.
    Klein JS; Harmon SP;
    Radiographics; 2012; 32(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 22236890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Improving the editing of medical journals and the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME)].
    Reyes H; Kauffmann R; Andresen M
    Rev Med Chil; 1997 Nov; 125(11):1289-91. PubMed ID: 9609048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Veterinary pathology and peer review.
    Cantor GH; Caswell JL; Crissman JW; Gillette DM; Gunson DE; Hogenesch H; Kiupel M; Mense MG; Miller MA; Rush LJ; Leger JA; Schoeb TR; Sellers RS; Sills RC; Swayne DE; Thomas HC; Ward JM; Alden CL
    Vet Pathol; 2009 Mar; 46(2):173-5. PubMed ID: 19261628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial.
    McNutt RA; Evans AT; Fletcher RH; Fletcher SW
    JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1371-6. PubMed ID: 2304216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Errors in science: the role of reviewers.
    Székely T; Krüger O; Krause ET
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2014 Jul; 29(7):371-3. PubMed ID: 24875588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Variation in journal peer review systems. Possible causes and consequences.
    Hargens LL
    JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1348-52. PubMed ID: 2304212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Open access under scrutiny.
    Samkange-Zeeb F; Zeeb H
    J Radiol Prot; 2013 Dec; 33(4):885-6. PubMed ID: 24285443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Quotational and reference accuracy in surgical journals. A continuing peer review problem.
    Evans JT; Nadjari HI; Burchell SA
    JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1353-4. PubMed ID: 2304213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Quotation accuracy: fact or fiction?
    Putterman C
    Isr J Med Sci; 1992 Jul; 28(7):465-70. PubMed ID: 1506172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Peer review by early career psychiatrists: an opportunity for development.
    Gross AF; Wiechers IR; Stern TA
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1600-1. PubMed ID: 20031102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Peer review in early career: just say yes!
    Roy-Byrne PP
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1602-3. PubMed ID: 20031104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Civil, sensible, and constructive peer review in APS journals.
    Raff H; Brown D
    Am J Physiol Renal Physiol; 2013 Aug; 305(3):F227-8. PubMed ID: 23678044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Civil, sensible, and constructive peer review in APS journals.
    Raff H; Brown D
    Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab; 2013 Aug; 305(3):E315-6. PubMed ID: 23673160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.