These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10221371)

  • 1. Comparison of two home blood pressure monitors with a mercury sphygmomanometer in an ambulatory population.
    Johnson KA; Partsch DJ; Gleason P; Makay K
    Pharmacotherapy; 1999 Mar; 19(3):333-9. PubMed ID: 10221371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Blood pressure monitoring with home monitors versus mercury sphygmomanometer.
    Rotch AL; Dean JO; Kendrach MG; Wright SG; Woolley TW
    Ann Pharmacother; 2001; 35(7-8):817-22. PubMed ID: 11485126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Which is More Accurate in Measuring the Blood Pressure? A Digital or an Aneroid Sphygmomanometer.
    Shahbabu B; Dasgupta A; Sarkar K; Sahoo SK
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Mar; 10(3):LC11-4. PubMed ID: 27134902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of an oscillometric home blood pressure monitor in an end-stage renal disease population and the effect of arterial stiffness on its accuracy.
    Thompson AM; Eguchi K; Reznik ME; Shah SS; Pickering TG
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):227-32. PubMed ID: 17625395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A perfect replacement for the mercury sphygmomanometer: the case of the hybrid blood pressure monitor.
    Stergiou GS; Karpettas N; Kollias A; Destounis A; Tzamouranis D
    J Hum Hypertens; 2012 Apr; 26(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 21900952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison study of brachial blood pressure recorded with Spacelabs 90217A and Mobil-O-Graph NG devices under static and ambulatory conditions.
    Sarafidis PA; Lazaridis AA; Imprialos KP; Georgianos PI; Avranas KA; Protogerou AD; Doumas MN; Athyros VG; Karagiannis AI
    J Hum Hypertens; 2016 Dec; 30(12):742-749. PubMed ID: 26935286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are there really differences between home and daytime ambulatory blood pressure? Comparison using a novel dual-mode ambulatory and home monitor.
    Stergiou GS; Tzamouranis D; Nasothimiou EG; Karpettas N; Protogerou A
    J Hum Hypertens; 2010 Mar; 24(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 19609285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of auscultatory and oscillometric automated blood pressure monitors in the setting of preeclampsia.
    Natarajan P; Shennan AH; Penny J; Halligan AW; de Swiet M; Anthony J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Nov; 181(5 Pt 1):1203-10. PubMed ID: 10561646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ensuring the accuracy of digital sphygmomanometers for home use.
    Nash CA
    Mayo Clin Proc; 1994 Oct; 69(10):1006-10. PubMed ID: 7934182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can aneroid sphygmomanometers be used at altitude?
    Kametas NA; McAuliffe F; Krampl E; Nicolaides KH; Shennan AH
    J Hum Hypertens; 2006 Jul; 20(7):517-22. PubMed ID: 16617312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How Accurate Are Home Blood Pressure Devices in Use? A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Ruzicka M; Akbari A; Bruketa E; Kayibanda JF; Baril C; Hiremath S
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0155677. PubMed ID: 27249056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are aneroid sphygmomanometers accurate in hospital and clinic settings?
    Canzanello VJ; Jensen PL; Schwartz GL
    Arch Intern Med; 2001 Mar; 161(5):729-31. PubMed ID: 11231706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating the accuracy of an aneroid sphygmomanometer in a clinical trial setting.
    Ma Y; Temprosa M; Fowler S; Prineas RJ; Montez MG; Brown-Friday J; Carrion-Petersen ML; Whittington T;
    Am J Hypertens; 2009 Mar; 22(3):263-6. PubMed ID: 19057514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study.
    Ni H; Wu C; Prineas R; Shea S; Liu K; Kronmal R; Bild D
    Am J Hypertens; 2006 Apr; 19(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 16580569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of automated home blood pressure monitoring in pregnancy: is it safe?
    Lo C; Taylor RS; Gamble G; McCowan L; North RA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Nov; 187(5):1321-8. PubMed ID: 12439526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Basic study on blood pressure measurements with a digital sphygmomanometers].
    Shibata K; Namikawa K; Murase C
    Kango Kenkyu; 1997; 30(4):69-75. PubMed ID: 9362848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The accuracy of aneroid sphygmomanometers in the ambulatory setting.
    Moore TA; Sorokin AV; Hirst C; Thornton-Thompson S; Thompson PD
    Prev Cardiol; 2008; 11(2):90-4. PubMed ID: 18401236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of the AM5600 ambulatory blood pressure monitor in children and adolescents.
    Jones DP; Richey PA; Alpert BS
    Blood Press Monit; 2008 Dec; 13(6):349-51. PubMed ID: 19020426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of the Grandway MD2301 digital automatic blood pressure monitor according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol.
    Chen W; Zeng ZL; Bing S; Li LY; Wang R; Wan Y
    Blood Press Monit; 2016 Aug; 21(4):259-61. PubMed ID: 27093703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Miniature electronic blood pressure monitor compared with a blind-reading mercury sphygmomanometer in pregnancy.
    Dawson AJ; Middlemiss C; Vanner TF
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1989 Nov; 33(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 2583339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.