163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10221802)
1. Visual acuity tests using chart, line, and single optotype in healthy and amblyopic children.
Morad Y; Werker E; Nemet P
J AAPOS; 1999 Apr; 3(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 10221802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of optotypes of Amsterdam Picture Chart with those of Tumbling-E, LEA symbols, ETDRS, and Landolt-C in non-amblyopic and amblyopic patients.
Engin O; Despriet DD; van der Meulen-Schot HM; Romers A; Slot X; Sang MT; Fronius M; Kelderman H; Simonsz HJ
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 252(12):2013-20. PubMed ID: 25228066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preliminary clinical validation of a new picture-based visual acuity test in children with amblyopia: a comparison of The Auckland Optotypes and crowded logMAR letters.
McVeigh EM; Ludden SM; Mohamed S; Shah N; Mulholland PJ; Dahlmann-Noor A
Eye (Lond); 2022 Dec; 36(12):2341-2345. PubMed ID: 34987195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of colored crowding bars on the HOTV visual acuity test in amblyopic patients.
Ruttum MS; Covert DJ
J AAPOS; 2008 Aug; 12(4):361-4. PubMed ID: 18708008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Crowded letter and crowded picture logMAR acuity in children with amblyopia: a quantitative comparison.
O'Boyle C; Chen SI; Little JA
Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 101(4):457-461. PubMed ID: 27388249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of visual acuity measurements via three different methods in preschool children: Lea symbols, crowded Lea symbols, Snellen E chart.
Inal A; Ocak OB; Aygit ED; Yilmaz I; Inal B; Taskapili M; Gokyigit B
Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Aug; 38(4):1385-1391. PubMed ID: 28639088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lea symbols: visual acuity assessment and detection of amblyopia.
Gräf MH; Becker R; Kaufmann H
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2000 Jan; 238(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 10664053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preliminary report: examination of young children with Lea symbols.
Becker RH; Hübsch SH; Gräf MH; Kaufmann H
Strabismus; 2000 Sep; 8(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 11035563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The repeatability of best corrected acuity in normal and amblyopic children 4 to 12 years of age.
Chen SI; Chandna A; Norcia AM; Pettet M; Stone D
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Feb; 47(2):614-9. PubMed ID: 16431958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the HOTV and Lea symbols visual acuity tests in patients with amblyopia.
Ruttum MS; Dahlgren M
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2006; 43(3):157-60. PubMed ID: 16761636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is LEA symbol better compared to Snellen chart for visual acuity assessment in preschool children?
Vivekanand U; Gonsalves S; Bhat SS
Rom J Ophthalmol; 2019; 63(1):35-37. PubMed ID: 31198896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of visual acuity levels in pediatric patients with amblyopia using Wright figures, Allen optotypes, and Snellen letters.
Mocan MC; Najera-Covarrubias M; Wright KW
J AAPOS; 2005 Feb; 9(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 15729280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Threshold visual acuity testing of preschool children using the crowded HOTV and Lea Symbols acuity tests.
Cyert L; Schmidt P; Maguire M; Moore B; Dobson V; Quinn G;
J AAPOS; 2003 Dec; 7(6):396-9. PubMed ID: 14730291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Distance versus near visual acuity in amblyopia.
Christoff A; Repka MX; Kaminski BM; Holmes JM;
J AAPOS; 2011 Aug; 15(4):342-4. PubMed ID: 21907115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of neutral density filters on testing in patients with strabismic amblyopia.
Habeeb SY; Arthur BW; ten Hove MW
Can J Ophthalmol; 2012 Aug; 47(4):348-50. PubMed ID: 22883843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High rate of failed visual-acuity measurements with the Amsterdam Picture Chart in screening at the age of 36 months.
Telleman MAJ; Sloot F; Benjamins J; Simonsz HJ
Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 Feb; 97(1):24-28. PubMed ID: 30284395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Should tumbling E go out of date in amblyopia screening? Evidence from a population-based sample normative in children aged 3-4 years.
Guimaraes S; Fernandes T; Costa P; Silva E
Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 102(6):761-766. PubMed ID: 28988161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A morphological study of amblyopic eyes in children failing to achieve normal visual acuity after electronically monitored long-term occlusion treatment.
Kuhli-Hattenbach C; Koss MJ; Kohnen T; Fronius M
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015 Nov; 253(11):2021-8. PubMed ID: 26100453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term changes in visual acuity and refractive error in amblyopes.
Rutstein RP; Corliss DA
Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Jul; 81(7):510-5. PubMed ID: 15252350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optical treatment of amblyopia in older children and adults is essential prior to enrolment in a clinical trial.
Gao TY; Anstice N; Babu RJ; Black JM; Bobier WR; Dai S; Guo CX; Hess RF; Jenkins M; Jiang Y; Kearns L; Kowal L; Lam CSY; Pang PCK; Parag V; South J; Staffieri SE; Wadham A; Walker N; Thompson B;
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 Mar; 38(2):129-143. PubMed ID: 29356022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
