198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10223395)
1. In vivo comparison of synthetic osseous graft materials. A preliminary study.
MacNeill SR; Cobb CM; Rapley JW; Glaros AG; Spencer P
J Clin Periodontol; 1999 Apr; 26(4):239-45. PubMed ID: 10223395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bone graft substitutes: a comparative qualitative histologic review of current osteoconductive grafting materials.
Al Ruhaimi KA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(1):105-14. PubMed ID: 11280355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Resorbable and nonresorbable hydroxyapatite granules as bone graft substitutes in rabbit cortical defects.
Liljensten E; Adolfsson E; Strid KG; Thomsen P
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2003; 5(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 14536044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the effects of different biomaterials on bone defects.
Dalkýz M; Ozcan A; Yapar M; Gökay N; Yüncü M
Implant Dent; 2000; 9(3):226-35. PubMed ID: 11307409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro osteoclast resorption of bone substitute biomaterials used for implant site augmentation: a pilot study.
Taylor JC; Cuff SE; Leger JP; Morra A; Anderson GI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):321-30. PubMed ID: 12074446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bone regeneration with calcium sulfate: evidence for increased angiogenesis in rabbits.
Strocchi R; Orsini G; Iezzi G; Scarano A; Rubini C; Pecora G; Piattelli A
J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(6):273-8. PubMed ID: 12498535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hydroxyapatite granule/carrier composites promote new bone formation in cortical defects.
Liljensten EL; Attaelmanan AG; Larsson C; Ljusberg-Wahren H; Danielsen N; Hirsch JM; Thomsen P
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2000; 2(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 11359275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Porous hydroxyapatite for grafting the maxillary sinus: a comparative histomorphometric study in sheep.
Haas R; Baron M; Donath K; Zechner W; Watzek G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 12074448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of adding resorbable calcium sulfate to grafting materials on early bone regeneration in osseous defects in rabbits.
al Ruhaimi KA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(6):859-64. PubMed ID: 11151586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A bioactive and bioresorbable porous cubic composite scaffold loaded with bone marrow aspirate: a potential alternative to autogenous bone grafting.
Tanaka K; Takemoto M; Fujibayashi S; Neo M; Shikinami Y; Nakamura T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Mar; 36(6):441-7. PubMed ID: 21124263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Histological and radiographic evaluations of demineralized bone matrix and coralline hydroxyapatite in the rabbit tibia.
Zhukauskas R; Dodds RA; Hartill C; Arola T; Cobb RR; Fox C
J Biomater Appl; 2010 Mar; 24(7):639-56. PubMed ID: 19581323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bone regeneration graft materials.
Hoexter DL
J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(6):290-4. PubMed ID: 12498538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of hydroxyapatite and autogenous cancellous bone grafts to repair bone defects in rats.
Silva RV; Camilli JA; Bertran CA; Moreira NH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 34(2):178-84. PubMed ID: 15695048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Calcium sulfate- and calcium phosphate-based bone substitutes. Mimicry of the mineral phase of bone.
Tay BK; Patel VV; Bradford DS
Orthop Clin North Am; 1999 Oct; 30(4):615-23. PubMed ID: 10471766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of biomaterial implants in the dental socket: histological analysis in dogs.
Santos FA; Pochapski MT; Martins MC; Zenóbio EG; Spolidoro LC; Marcantonio E
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Mar; 12(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 18783409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of bioactive glass to demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft in the treatment of intrabony defects around implants in the canine mandible.
Hall EE; Meffert RM; Hermann JS; Mellonig JT; Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 1999 May; 70(5):526-35. PubMed ID: 10368057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative performance of three ceramic bone graft substitutes.
Hing KA; Wilson LF; Buckland T
Spine J; 2007; 7(4):475-90. PubMed ID: 17630146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bone healing and graft resorption of autograft, anorganic bovine bone and beta-tricalcium phosphate. A histologic and histomorphometric study in the mandibles of minipigs.
Jensen SS; Broggini N; Hjørting-Hansen E; Schenk R; Buser D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Jun; 17(3):237-43. PubMed ID: 16672017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of 45S5 Bioactive Glass in A Standard Calcium Phosphate Collagen Bone Graft Substitute on the Posterolateral Fusion of Rabbit Spine.
Pugely AJ; Petersen EB; DeVries-Watson N; Fredericks DC
Iowa Orthop J; 2017; 37():193-198. PubMed ID: 28852357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of calcium sulfate and autogenous bone graft to bioabsorbable membranes plus autogenous bone graft in the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects: a split-mouth study.
Orsini M; Orsini G; Benlloch D; Aranda JJ; Lazaro P; Sanz M; De Luca M; Piattelli A
J Periodontol; 2001 Mar; 72(3):296-302. PubMed ID: 11327056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
