These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10226433)

  • 1. Isolating the interference caused by cue duration in partial report: a quantitative approach.
    Giesbrecht B; Dixon P
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Mar; 27(2):220-33. PubMed ID: 10226433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Disengaging attention: on the locus of the cue-duration effect in partial report.
    Fenske MJ; Stolz JA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Dec; 27(6):1335-46. PubMed ID: 11766928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The location but not the attributes of visual cues are automatically encoded into working memory.
    Chen H; Wyble B
    Vision Res; 2015 Feb; 107():76-85. PubMed ID: 25490435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do peripheral non-informative cues induce early facilitation of target detection?
    Tassinari G; Aglioti S; Chelazzi L; Peru A; Berlucchi G
    Vision Res; 1994 Jan; 34(2):179-89. PubMed ID: 8116277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cueing listeners to attend to a target talker progressively improves word report as the duration of the cue-target interval lengthens to 2,000 ms.
    Holmes E; Kitterick PT; Summerfield AQ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1520-1538. PubMed ID: 29696570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 20398881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of processing demands in partial report.
    Matthew JS; Antes JR
    Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Jun; 44(3 Pt 1):847-56. PubMed ID: 876794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Voluntary eyeblinks disrupt iconic memory.
    Thomas LE; Irwin DE
    Percept Psychophys; 2006 Apr; 68(3):475-88. PubMed ID: 16900838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Feature-based attention elicited by precueing in an orientation discrimination task.
    Huang D; Xue L; Wang M; Hu Q; Bu X; Chen Y
    Vision Res; 2018 Jul; 148():15-25. PubMed ID: 29763696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Switching, plasticity, and prediction in a saccadic task-switch paradigm.
    Barton JJ; Greenzang C; Hefter R; Edelman J; Manoach DS
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 168(1-2):76-87. PubMed ID: 16096781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Orienting attention to locations in internal representations.
    Griffin IC; Nobre AC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Nov; 15(8):1176-94. PubMed ID: 14709235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Location errors in partial-report bar-probe experiments: in search of the origin of cue-alignment problems.
    Hagenaar R; van der Heijden AH
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Sep; 25(5):641-52. PubMed ID: 9337582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
    Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Task probability and report of feature information: what you know about what you 'see' depends on what you expect to need.
    Pilling M; Gellatly A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Jul; 143(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 23684851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Capacity limitations of visual memory in two-interval comparison of Gabor arrays.
    Lakha L; Wright MJ
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(14):1707-16. PubMed ID: 15136005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The relationship between central cues and peripheral cues in covert visual orientation.
    Riggio L; Kirsner K
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Aug; 59(6):885-99. PubMed ID: 9270363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sex differences in cue perception in a visual scene: investigation of cue type.
    Barkley CL; Gabriel KI
    Behav Neurosci; 2007 Apr; 121(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 17469918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Facilitative and inhibitory effects of cuing sound duration, intensity, and timbre.
    Mondor TA; Lacey TE
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 May; 63(4):726-36. PubMed ID: 11436741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Isolating event-related potential components associated with voluntary control of visuo-spatial attention.
    McDonald JJ; Green JJ
    Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 1227():96-109. PubMed ID: 18621037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fast temporal dynamics of visual cue integration.
    Triesch J; Ballard DH; Jacobs RA
    Perception; 2002; 31(4):421-34. PubMed ID: 12018788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.