These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10226433)

  • 61. Enhancement of letter identification by concurrent auditory stimuli of varying duration.
    de la Rosa MD; Bausenhart KM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Oct; 190():38-52. PubMed ID: 30005175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Signal enhancement, not active suppression, follows the contingent capture of visual attention.
    Livingstone AC; Christie GJ; Wright RD; McDonald JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Feb; 43(2):219-224. PubMed ID: 28134549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. The impact of predictive cues and visual working memory on dynamic oculomotor selection.
    Weaver MD; Paoletti D; van Zoest W
    J Vis; 2014 Mar; 14(3):27. PubMed ID: 24665090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Retrospective triggering of conscious perception by an interstimulus interaction.
    Xia Y; Morimoto Y; Noguchi Y
    J Vis; 2016 May; 16(7):3. PubMed ID: 27139584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Two forms of persistence in visual information processing.
    Di Lollo V; Dixon P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1988 Nov; 14(4):671-681. PubMed ID: 2974875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Deficits in auditory and visual context-dependent processing in schizophrenia: defining the pattern.
    Javitt DC; Shelley AM; Silipo G; Lieberman JA
    Arch Gen Psychiatry; 2000 Dec; 57(12):1131-7. PubMed ID: 11115326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():37-45. PubMed ID: 29223864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Visual learning by cue-dependent and cue-invariant mechanisms.
    Ivanchenko V; Jacobs RA
    Vision Res; 2007 Jan; 47(2):145-56. PubMed ID: 17150239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Effect of characteristics of target cues on task interference from prospective memory.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Jackson T; Yang H
    Neuroreport; 2009 Jan; 20(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 18978643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. On the contribution of motor planning to the retroactive cuing benefit in working memory: Evidence by mu and beta oscillatory activity in the EEG.
    Schneider D; Barth A; Wascher E
    Neuroimage; 2017 Nov; 162():73-85. PubMed ID: 28847491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Robust cue integration: a Bayesian model and evidence from cue-conflict studies with stereoscopic and figure cues to slant.
    Knill DC
    J Vis; 2007 May; 7(7):5.1-24. PubMed ID: 17685801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Forgotten but not gone: Retro-cue costs and benefits in a double-cueing paradigm suggest multiple states in visual short-term memory.
    van Moorselaar D; Olivers CN; Theeuwes J; Lamme VA; Sligte IG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1755-63. PubMed ID: 25867613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Dominance dynamics of competition between intrinsic and extrinsic grouping cues.
    Luna D; Villalba-García C; Montoro PR; Hinojosa JA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Oct; 170():146-54. PubMed ID: 27423888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Role of cholinergic-muscarinic receptors in visual discrimination performance of rats: importance of stimulus load.
    Tsui CK; Dringenberg HC
    Behav Brain Res; 2013 Feb; 238():23-9. PubMed ID: 23078949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Cross-modal cueing in audiovisual spatial attention.
    Blurton SP; Greenlee MW; Gondan M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2356-76. PubMed ID: 26001381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. The effects of memory load and the contrast of the rod signal on partial report superiority in a Sperling task.
    Sakitt B; Appelman IB
    Mem Cognit; 1978 Sep; 6(5):562-7. PubMed ID: 24203390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Isolating the interference caused by cue duration in partial report: a quantitative approach.
    Giesbrecht B; Dixon P
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Mar; 27(2):220-33. PubMed ID: 10226433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Disengaging attention: on the locus of the cue-duration effect in partial report.
    Fenske MJ; Stolz JA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Dec; 27(6):1335-46. PubMed ID: 11766928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. The location but not the attributes of visual cues are automatically encoded into working memory.
    Chen H; Wyble B
    Vision Res; 2015 Feb; 107():76-85. PubMed ID: 25490435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Do peripheral non-informative cues induce early facilitation of target detection?
    Tassinari G; Aglioti S; Chelazzi L; Peru A; Berlucchi G
    Vision Res; 1994 Jan; 34(2):179-89. PubMed ID: 8116277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.