These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10226631)
1. Changes in breast compressibility with age: implications for stereotactic biopsy. Kalbhen CL; Kezdi-Rogus PC Can Assoc Radiol J; 1999 Apr; 50(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 10226631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast thickness in routine mammograms: effect on image quality and radiation dose. Helvie MA; Chan HP; Adler DD; Boyd PG AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Dec; 163(6):1371-4. PubMed ID: 7992731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clip placement after an 11-gauge vacuum-assisted stereotactic breast biopsy: correlation between breast thickness and clip movement. Uematsu T; Kasami M; Takahashi K; Watanabe J; Yamasaki S; Tanaka K; Tadokoro Y; Ogiya A Breast Cancer; 2012 Jan; 19(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 21274668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Self-compression Technique vs Standard Compression in Mammography: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Henrot P; Boisserie-Lacroix M; Boute V; Troufléau P; Boyer B; Lesanne G; Gillon V; Desandes E; Netter E; Saadate M; Tardivon A; Grentzinger C; Salleron J; Oldrini G JAMA Intern Med; 2019 Mar; 179(3):407-414. PubMed ID: 30715083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mammography in the evaluation of nipple inversion. Kalbhen CL; Kezdi-Rogus PC; Dowling MP; Flisak ME AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):117-21. PubMed ID: 9423612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computer-aided detection in digital mammography: comparison of craniocaudal, mediolateral oblique, and mediolateral views. Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):695-701. PubMed ID: 17114620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast compression and radiation dose in two different mammographic oblique projections: 45 and 60 degrees. Brnić Z; Hebrang A Eur J Radiol; 2001 Oct; 40(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 11673002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of Mammography on Marker Clip Migration After Stereotactic-Guided Core Needle Breast Biopsy. Le-Petross HT; Hess KR; Knudtson JD; Lane DL; Moseley TW; Geiser WR; Whitman GJ Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2017; 46(6):410-414. PubMed ID: 28390794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stereotactic core needle breast biopsy is an accurate diagnostic technique to assess nonpalpable mammographic abnormalities. Fuhrman G; Cederbom G; Champagne J; Farr G; McKinnon W; Bolton J; Ordoyne WK J La State Med Soc; 1996 Apr; 148(4):167-70. PubMed ID: 8935619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stereotactic and ultrasound core needle breast biopsy performed by surgeons. Roe SM; Mathews JA; Burns RP; Sumida MP; Craft P; Greer MS Am J Surg; 1997 Dec; 174(6):699-703; discussion 703-4. PubMed ID: 9409600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stereotactic core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions using a conventional mammography unit with an add-on device. Kirshenbaum KJ; Voruganti T; Overbeeke C; Kirshenbaum MD; Patel P; Kaplan G; Maker V; August C; Cavallino RP AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Aug; 181(2):527-31. PubMed ID: 12876040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective comparison of stereotactic core biopsy and surgical excision as diagnostic procedures for breast cancer patients. Morrow M; Venta L; Stinson T; Bennett C Ann Surg; 2001 Apr; 233(4):537-41. PubMed ID: 11303136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast compression in mammography: how much is enough? Poulos A; McLean D; Rickard M; Heard R Australas Radiol; 2003 Jun; 47(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 12780439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stereotactic fine needle aspiration in the management of mammographic abnormalities detected in breast screening. Chan MC; Lam HS; Gwi E; Leung TY; Lau Y; Yip WC Aust N Z J Surg; 1996 Sep; 66(9):595-7. PubMed ID: 8859157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic accuracy of stereotactic large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease: results of a multicenter prospective study with 95% surgical confirmation. Verkooijen HM; Int J Cancer; 2002 Jun; 99(6):853-9. PubMed ID: 12115488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Results of stereotactic breast biopsy in mammographically suspicious lesions]. Jäger HJ; Schatz TH; Mehring UM; Kubasch M; Hennigs S; Gissler HM; Spörl HD; Mathias KD Rofo; 2000 Apr; 172(4):346-53. PubMed ID: 10961219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mammographic determination of breast volume: comparing different methods. Kalbhen CL; McGill JJ; Fendley PM; Corrigan KW; Angelats J AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Dec; 173(6):1643-9. PubMed ID: 10584814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can Breast Compression Be Reduced in Digital Mammography and Breast Tomosynthesis? Agasthya GA; D'Orsi E; Kim YJ; Handa P; Ho CP; D'Orsi CJ; Sechopoulos I AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Nov; 209(5):W322-W332. PubMed ID: 28929809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stereotactic-guided excisional biopsy: a new technique for very thin breasts. Diaz ML; Noguera JJ; Alonso-Burgos A; Dominguez P; Pina LJ; Zornoza G; Martínez-Regueira F Breast J; 2006; 12(6):566-8. PubMed ID: 17238988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]