188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10227124)
1. Non specific serological reactions in the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis: experimental oral infection of cattle with repeated doses of Yersinia enterocolitica O:9.
Garin-Bastuji B; Hummel N; Gerbier G; Cau C; Pouillot R; Da Costa M; Fontaine JJ
Vet Microbiol; 1999 Apr; 66(3):223-33. PubMed ID: 10227124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cell-mediated immune responses differentiate infections with Brucella suis from Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:9 in pigs.
Riber U; Jungersen G
Vet Immunol Immunopathol; 2007 Mar; 116(1-2):13-25. PubMed ID: 17270281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Specificity dependence between serological tests for diagnosing bovine brucellosis in Brucella-free farms showing false positive serological reactions due to Yersinia enterocolitica O:9.
Mainar-Jaime RC; Muñoz PM; de Miguel MJ; Grilló MJ; Marín CM; Moriyón I; Blasco JM
Can Vet J; 2005 Oct; 46(10):913-6. PubMed ID: 16454384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:9 in the faeces of cattle with false positive reactions in serological tests for brucellosis in Ireland.
O'Grady D; Kenny K; Power S; Egan J; Ryan F
Vet J; 2016 Oct; 216():133-5. PubMed ID: 27687940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Serological discrimination by indirect enzyme immunoassay between the antibody response to Brucella sp. and Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 in cattle and pigs.
Nielsen K; Smith P; Yu W; Nicoletti P; Jungersen G; Stack J; Godfroid J
Vet Immunol Immunopathol; 2006 Jan; 109(1-2):69-78. PubMed ID: 16140390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differentiation of Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica serotype 09 infections in cattle: the use of specific lymphocyte transformation and brucellin skin tests.
Chukwu CC
Vet Q; 1987 Apr; 9(2):134-42. PubMed ID: 3113038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Serological crossreactivity between Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica 0:9 II the use of Yersinia outer proteins for the specific detection of Yersinia enterocolitica infections in ruminants.
Kittelberger R; Hilbink F; Hansen MF; Ross GP; Joyce MA; Fenwick S; Heesemann J; Wolf-Watz H; Nielsen K
Vet Microbiol; 1995 Dec; 47(3-4):271-80. PubMed ID: 8748542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Serological crossreactivity between Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica 0:9. III. Specificity of the in vitro antigen-specific gamma interferon test for bovine brucellosis diagnosis in experimentally Yersinia enterocolitica 0:9-infected cattle.
Kittelberger R; Reichel MP; Joyce MA; Staak C
Vet Microbiol; 1997 Oct; 57(4):361-71. PubMed ID: 9444073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cross-reactivity in serological tests for brucellosis: a comparison of immune response of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 vs Brucella spp.
Bonfini B; Chiarenza G; Paci V; Sacchini F; Salini R; Vesco G; Villari S; Zilli K; Tittarelli M
Vet Ital; 2018 Jun; 54(2):107-114. PubMed ID: 30019327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Infection of cattle with Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 a cause of the false positive serological reactions in bovine brucellosis diagnostic tests.
Weynants V; Tibor A; Denoel PA; Saegerman C; Godfroid J; Thiange P; Letesson JJ
Vet Microbiol; 1996 Jan; 48(1-2):101-12. PubMed ID: 8701566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. False positive serological reactions in bovine brucellosis: evidence of the role of Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:9 in a field trial.
Gerbier G; Garin-Bastuji B; Pouillot R; Véry P; Cau C; Berr V; Dufour B; Moutou F
Vet Res; 1997; 28(4):375-83. PubMed ID: 9257445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Serological cross-reactivity between Brucella abortus and yersinia enterocolitica 0:9: IV. Evaluation of the M- and C-epitope antibody response for the specific detection of B. abortus infections.
Kittelberger R; Bundesen PG; Cloeckaert A; Greiser-Wilke I; Letesson JJ
Vet Microbiol; 1998 Feb; 60(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 9595626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Contribution to the differentiation of cross-reacting antibodies in brucellosis serology--1. Reactions with various Yersinia serotypes and antibody avidity].
Staak C; Draeger A; Bahn P; Nöckler K
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2000 Oct; 113(10):361-7. PubMed ID: 11084752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of several serological tests and antigens for diagnosis of bovine brucellosis in the presence of false-positive serological results due to Yersinia enterocolitica O:9.
Muñoz PM; Marín CM; Monreal D; González D; Garin-Bastuji B; Díaz R; Mainar-Jaime RC; Moriyón I; Blasco JM
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol; 2005 Jan; 12(1):141-51. PubMed ID: 15642999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Serological relationship between cattle exposed to Brucella abortus, Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 and Escherichia coli O157:H7.
Nielsen K; Smith P; Widdison J; Gall D; Kelly L; Kelly W; Nicoletti P
Vet Microbiol; 2004 May; 100(1-2):25-30. PubMed ID: 15135510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Incidence of antibodies against Yersinia enterocolitica in swine sera in relation to the serological differentiation of Brucella infections].
Schmittdiel E; von Wangenheim B; Chorherr S
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1985 Jan; 98(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 3985937
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to differentiate the antibody responses of animals infected with Brucella species from those of animals infected with Yersinia enterocolitica O9.
Erdenebaatar J; Bayarsaikhan B; Watarai M; Makino S; Shirahata T
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol; 2003 Jul; 10(4):710-4. PubMed ID: 12853409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Yersinia enterocolitica: an unlikely cause of positive brucellosis tests in greater yellowstone ecosystem bison (Bison bison).
See W; Edwards WH; Dauwalter S; Almendra C; Kardos MD; Lowell JL; Wallen R; Cain SL; Holben WE; Luikart G
J Wildl Dis; 2012 Jul; 48(3):537-41. PubMed ID: 22740518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Serological reactions to Brucella species in British pigs.
Wrathall AE; Broughton ES; Gill KP; Goldsmith GP
Vet Rec; 1993 May; 132(18):449-54. PubMed ID: 8517004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Serological cross-reactions between Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica 0:9.
Mittal KR; Tizard IR; Barnum DA
Int J Zoonoses; 1985 Sep; 12(3):219-27. PubMed ID: 2422134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]